By default LLVM thinks very large vectors get aligned to their size when
passed across functions. Unfortunately no-one told the ARM backend so it
doesn't trigger stack realignment and so accesses can cause the usual
misalignment issues (e.g. a data abort).
This changes the ABI alignment to the stack alignment, which in practice
(and as a bonus) also coincides with the alignment "natural" vectors get.
llvm-svn: 331451
This is a follow-up change to r331150. The CL moved the macro from individual
file to build file, but the macro is missed in a test config file.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46385
Patch from Taiju Tsuiki <tzik@chromium.org>!
llvm-svn: 331450
Summary:
lldb-test already had the ability to dump all symbol information in a
module. This is interesting, but it can be too verbose, and it also does
not use the same APIs that lldb uses to query symbol information. The
last part is interesting to me now, because I am about to add DWARF v5
debug_names support, which needs to implement these APIs.
This patch adds a set of arguments to lldb-test, which modify it's
behavior from dumping all symbols to dumping only the requested
information:
- --find={function,namespace,type,variable} - search for the given
kind of objects.
- --name - the name to search for.
- --regex - whether to treat the "name" as a regular expression. This is
not available for all lookup types (we do not have the required APIs
for namespaces and types).
- --context - specifies the context, which can be used to restrict the
search. This argument takes a variable name (which must be defined and
be unique), and we then use the context that this variable is defined
in as the search context.
- --function-flags={auto,full,base,method,selector} - a set of flags to
further restrict the search for function symbols.
Together, these flags and their combinations cover the main SymbolFile
entry points which I will need to modify for the accelerator table
support, and so I plan to do most of the regression testing this way.
(I've also found this a useful tool for exploration of what the given
APIs are supposed to do.)
I add a couple of tests to demonstrate the usage of the usage of the
various options, and also an xfailed test which demonstrates a bug I
found while playing with this. The only requirement for these tests is
the presence of lld -- the should run on any platform which is able to
build lldb.
These tests use c++ code as input, but this isn't a requirement. It is also
possible to use IR, assembly or json to create the test module.
Reviewers: davide, zturner, asmith, JDevlieghere, clayborg, alexshap
Subscribers: mgorny, aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46318
llvm-svn: 331447
Also retagged VDBPSADBW instructions as SchedWritePSADBW instead of SchedWriteVecIMul which matches the behaviour on SkylakeServer (the only thing that supports it...)
llvm-svn: 331445
The code fails to check that the same value is used twice. We only make sure the left hand side of the and is part of the loop recurrence. The 'x' in the subtract can be any value.
llvm-svn: 331436
It's OK to either flush to 0 or return denormal result if the device
does not support denormals. See sec 7.2 and 7.5.3 of OCL specs.
Fixes CTS on carrizo and turks.
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
Reviewer: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 331435
double version passes on carrizo. float version fails on denormals.
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
Reviewer: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 331434
Add overloads for `__len__` and `__getitem__` to allow use of this class
on Linux as well as Windows. With these overloads, lit can be used on
both hosts for the swift testsuite.
llvm-svn: 331431
FunctionProtoType.
We previously re-evaluated the expression each time we wanted to know whether
the type is noexcept or not. We now evaluate the expression exactly once.
This is not quite "no functional change": it fixes a crasher bug during AST
deserialization where we would try to evaluate the noexcept specification in a
situation where we have not deserialized sufficient portions of the AST to
permit such evaluation.
llvm-svn: 331428
This patch was temporarily reverted because it has exposed bug 37229 on
PowerPC platform. The bug is unrelated to the patch and was just a general
bug in the optimization done for PowerPC platform only. The bug was fixed
by the patch rL331410.
This patch returns the disabled commit since the bug was fixed.
llvm-svn: 331427
This changes some aspects of the build that are not relevant or useful
for Fuchsia like setting the RPATH/RUNPATH.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46361
llvm-svn: 331425
These are necessary changes to support building LLVM for Fuchsia.
While these are not sufficient to run on Fuchsia, they are still
useful when cross-compiling LLVM libraries and runtimes for Fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46345
llvm-svn: 331423
the method declaration is unavailable for an app extension platform
Rationale:
Classes are often shared between an app extension code and
non-app extension code. There's no way to remove the implementation
using preprocessor when building the app extension, so we should not warn here.
rdar://38150617
llvm-svn: 331421
Summary:
Machine Instruction flags for fast math support and MIR print support
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45781
llvm-svn: 331417
Sinking the and closer to a compare against zero is beneficial on PPC as it
allows us to emit record-form instructions. In the future, we may expand this
to a larger set of operations that feed compares against zero since PPC has
lots of record-form instructions.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46060
llvm-svn: 331416
This code previously existed only in MCMachOStreamer but is
useful for WebAssembly too. See: D46335
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46297
llvm-svn: 331412
instrumentation codegeneration strategy of using a data structure and
a loop. Required some finesse to get the critical things being tested to
surface in a nice way for FileCheck but I think this preserves the
original intent of the test.
llvm-svn: 331411
The CTR loops pass will insert the decrementing branch instruction in an exiting
block for the loop being transformed. However if that block is part of another
loop as well (whether a nested loop or with irreducible CFG), it is not valid
to use that exiting block. In fact, if the loop hass irreducible CFG, we don't
bother analyzing it and we just bail on the transformation. In practice, this
doesn't lead to a noticeable reduction in the number of loops transformed by
this pass.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37229
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46162
llvm-svn: 331410
Summary:
Prior to this change, LLVM would in some cases emit *massive* writeout
functions with many 10s of 1000s of function calls in straight-line
code. This is a very wasteful way to represent what are fundamentally
loops and creates a number of scalability issues. Among other things,
register allocating these calls is extremely expensive. While D46127 makes this
less severe, we'll still run into scaling issues with this eventually. If not
in the compile time, just from the code size.
Now the pass builds up global data structures modeling the inputs to
these functions, and simply loops over the data structures calling the
relevant functions with those values. This ensures that the code size is
a fixed and only data size grows with larger amounts of coverage data.
A trivial change to IRBuilder is included to make it easier to build
the constants that make up the global data.
Reviewers: wmi, echristo
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46357
llvm-svn: 331407
The return values of the newly supported functions were not handled correctly:
strlcpy()/strlcat() return string sizes rather than pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45177
llvm-svn: 331401
I believe all of the x86 builtins should be considered nothrow.
I've left the incssp builtins alone because I think its current attributes are wrong and I'm following up with the contributor for that.
I plan to start adding const as well, but that requires more careful auditing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46328
llvm-svn: 331399
to make sure that Testgen always has access to coverage info even if
the match table used by the selector itself is stripped off that
information for performance reasons.
Reviewers: dsanders, aemerson
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46098
llvm-svn: 331398
Tim Northover