Adds tests verifying the proper dirs are found in the Debian 8/GCC4.9
layout for sparc (32bit), sparc (32bit) with lib64 multilib, and
sparc64.
The test cases added here also cover r239047, which fixed the linker
paths.
llvm-svn: 239154
input / output with memory constraint.
One generally can't get address of a bit field, so the general solution is to
error on such cases. GCC does the same.
Patch by Andrey Bokhanko
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10086
llvm-svn: 239153
The main effect of this is to fix anomalies where certain -mfpu options didn't
disable everything that they should causing strange behaviour when combined
with -mcpu or -march values that themselves enabled fpu subtarget features,
e.g. -mfpu=fpv5-dp-d16 with -march=armv7em previously behaved the same as
-mfpu=fpv5-sp-d16 due to fp-only-sp not being disabled.
Invalid -mfpu options now also give an error, which is consistent with the
handling of the .fpu directive.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10239
llvm-svn: 239152
These are added mainly for the benefit of clang, but this also means that they
are now allowed in .fpu directives and we emit the correct .fpu directive when
single-precision-only is used.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10238
llvm-svn: 239151
Add getFPUFeatures to TargetParser, which gets the list of subtarget features
that are enabled/disabled for each FPU, and use it when handling the .fpu
directive.
No functional change in this commit, though clang will start behaving
differently once it starts using this.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10237
llvm-svn: 239150
Before:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t) -> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a)
.aaaaaaaa());
After:
template <typename T>
auto aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(T t)
-> decltype(eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<T>(t.a).aaaaaaaa());
Also add a test case for a difficult template parsing case I stumbled accross.
Needs fixing.
llvm-svn: 239149
Setting the OSType in the ArchSpec triple is needed to correctly setup
up the register context plugin. ArchSpec::SetArchitecture, for Mach-O
only, sets the OSType. For ELF it was left to the ObjectFileELF to fill
in the missing OSType.
This change moves the ObjectFileELF logic into ArchSpec.
A new optional 'os' parameter has been added to SetArchitecture.
For ELF, this value is the from the ELF header.e_ident[EI_OSABI].
The default value is 0 or ELFOSABI_NONE.
The real work of determining the OSType was done by the ObjectFileELF
helper function GetOsFromOSABI. This logic has been moved
SetArchitecture.
GetOsFromOSABI has been commented as being deprectated. It is left in
to support asserts.
For ELF the vendor value returned from SetArchitecture should be
UnknownVendor. An unneeded resetting in ObjectFileELF has been removed
and replaced with an assert.
This fixes a problem reading a core file on FreeBSD/ARM because the spec
triple was arm-unknown-unknown.
Patch by Tom Rix.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9292
llvm-svn: 239148
Summary:
Only restoring AvailableFeatures is not enough and will lead to buggy behaviour.
For example, if we have a feature enabled and we ".set pop", the next time we try
to ".set" that feature nothing will happen because the "!(STI.getFeatureBits()[Feature])"
check will be false, because we didn't restore STI.FeatureBits.
In order to fix this, we need to make MipsAssemblerOptions remember the STI.FeatureBits
instead of the AvailableFeatures and then regenerate AvailableFeatures each time we ".set pop".
This is because, AFAIK, there is no way to convert from AvailableFeatures back to STI.FeatureBits,
but the reverse is possible by using ComputeAvailableFeatures(STI.FeatureBits).
I also moved the updating of AssemblerOptions inside the "if" statement in
setFeatureBits() and clearFeatureBits(), as there is no reason to update if
nothing changes.
Reviewers: dsanders, mkuper
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9156
llvm-svn: 239144
isInductionPHI wants to calculate the stride based on the pointee size.
However, this is not possible when the pointee is zero sized.
This fixes PR23763.
llvm-svn: 239143
Also, moved test cases from CodeGen/X86/fold-buildvector-bug.ll into
CodeGen/X86/buildvec-insertvec.ll and regenerated CHECK lines using
update_llc_test_checks.py.
llvm-svn: 239142
I don't have the IR which is causing the build bot breakage but I can
postulate as to why they are timing out:
1. SimplifyWithOpReplaced was stripping flags from the simplified value.
2. visitSelectInstWithICmp was overriding SimplifyWithOpReplaced because
it's simplification wasn't correct.
3. InstCombine would revisit the add instruction and note that it can
rederive the flags.
4. By modifying the value, we chose to revisit instructions which reuse
the value. One of the instructions is the original select, causing
LLVM to never reach fixpoint.
Instead, strip the flags only when we are sure we are going to perform
the simplification.
llvm-svn: 239141
This is a more correct representation than using "Equality" introduced
in r238942 which was a quick fix to solve an actual regression.
According to the typescript spec, arrows behave like "low-precedence"
assignments.
Before:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
After:
var a = a.aaaaaaa((a: a) => aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbbbb) &&
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(bbbbbbb));
llvm-svn: 239137
When we generate coverage data, we explicitly set each coverage map's
alignment to 8 (See InstrProfiling::lowerCoverageData), but when we
read the coverage data, we assume consecutive maps are exactly
adjacent. When we're dealing with 32 bit, maps can end on a 4 byte
boundary, causing us to think the padding is part of the next record.
Fix this by adjusting the buffer to an appropriately aligned address
between records.
This is pretty awkward to test, as it requires a binary with multiple
coverage maps to hit, so we'd need to check in multiple source files
and a binary blob as inputs.
llvm-svn: 239129
Summary:
This patch enables lexing of `concept` and `requires` as keywords.
Further changes which add messages for future keyword compat are to
follow.
Test Plan:
Testing of C++14 + Concepts TS mode is added to
`test/Lexer/keywords_test.cpp`, which expects that the new keywords are
enabled under said mode.
Reviewers: faisalv, fraggamuffin, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10233
llvm-svn: 239128
Summary:
This change adds the infrastructure to mark tests as xfail for specific
Android API levels.
Test Plan: dotest.py TestChangeProcessGroup on an Android API 16 device.
Reviewers: chying, labath, chaoren
Reviewed By: labath, chaoren
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10261
llvm-svn: 239126
We cleverly handle cases where computation done in one argument of a select
instruction is suitable for the other operand, thus obviating the need
of the select and the comparison. However, the other operand cannot
have flags.
This fixes PR23757.
llvm-svn: 239115
gc.statepoint intrinsics with a far immediate call target
were lowered incorrectly as pc-rel32 calls.
This change fixes the problem, and generates an indirect call
via a scratch register.
For example:
Intrinsic:
%safepoint_token = call i32 (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...) @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* inttoptr (i64 140727162896504 to void ()*), i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
Old Incorrect Lowering:
callq 140727162896504
New Correct Lowering:
movabsq $140727162896504, %rax
callq *%rax
In lowerCallFromStatepoint(), the callee-target was modified and
represented as a "TargetConstant" node, rather than a "Constant" node.
Undoing this modification enabled LowerCall() to generate the
correct CALL instruction.
llvm-svn: 239114
Summary:
A small bit that I missed when I updated the X86 backend to account for
the Win64 calling convention on non-Windows. Now we don't use dead
non-volatile registers when emitting a Win64 indirect tail call on
non-Windows.
Should fix PR23710.
Test Plan: Added test for the correct behavior based on the case I posted to PR23710.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10258
llvm-svn: 239111