it has more than one real use (non-chain uses).
* Record folded chain producing node in CodeGenMap.
* Do not fold a chain producing node if it has already been selected as an
operand of a chain use.
llvm-svn: 24647
matching code that is not currently auto-generated by tblgen, e.g. X86
addressing mode. Selection routines for complex patterns can return multiple operands, e.g. X86 addressing mode returns 4.
llvm-svn: 24634
* Enhanced tblgen to handle instructions which have chain operand and writes a
chain result.
* Enhanced tblgen to handle instructions which produces no results. Part of
the change is a temporary hack which relies on instruction property (e.g.
isReturn, isBranch). The proper fix would be to change the .td syntax to
separate results dag from ops dag.
llvm-svn: 24587
def SHL8rCL : I<0xD2, MRM4r, (ops R8 :$dst, R8 :$src),
"shl{b} {%cl, $dst|$dst, %CL}",
[(set R8:$dst, (shl R8:$src, CL))]>, Imp<[CL],[]>;
This generates a CopyToReg operand and added its 2nd result to the shl as
a flag operand.
llvm-svn: 24557
write things like this:
def : Pat<(add GPRC:$in, 12),
(ADD12 GPRC:$in)>;
Andrew: if this isn't enough or doesn't work for you, please lemme know.
llvm-svn: 23819
a pattern match, make sure to emit the (minimal number of) type checks that
verify the pattern matches this specific instruction. This allows FMA32
patterns to not match double expressions for example.
llvm-svn: 23748
type constraint. This lets tblgen realize that it doesn't need any dynamic
type checks for fextend/fround on PPC (and many other targets), because there
are only two fp types.
llvm-svn: 23730
1. If an operation has to be int or fp and the target only supports one
int or fp type, relize that the op has to have that type.
2. If a target has operations on multiple types, do not emit matching code
for patterns involving those operators, since we do not emit the code to
check for them yet. This prevents PPC from generating FP ops currently.
Also move some code around into more logical places.
llvm-svn: 23724
doesn't have to specify them manually. It currently handles associativity,
e.g. knowing that (X*Y)+Z also matches X+(Y*Z) and will be extended in
the future.
It is smart enough to not introduce duplicate patterns or patterns that can
never match.
llvm-svn: 23526
Currently we check that immediate values live on the RHS of commutative
operators. Defining ORI like this, for example:
def ORI : DForm_4<24, (ops GPRC:$dst, GPRC:$src1, u16imm:$src2),
"ori $dst, $src1, $src2",
[(set GPRC:$dst, (or immZExt16:$src2, GPRC:$src1))]>;
results in:
tblgen: In ORI: Instruction can never match: Immediate values must be on the RHS of commutative operators!
llvm-svn: 23501
Evan Cheng