CLooG and the CLooG based code generation does not yet correctly derive the
types of the expressions, but just uses i64 for everything. This is incorrect,
but works normally pretty well. However, the recent change of adding parameter
bounds to the context made CLooG generate expressions that contain a lot of very
large integers that possibly don't fit into an i64. This broke the code
generation for several benchmarks.
To get the CLooG based code generation working again, we just don't take into
account any constraints in the context. This brings us back to the theoretical
incorrect, but in practice generally correct code.
The next step will be the isl based code generation. Here we will derive
automatically correct types.
llvm-svn: 158015
This is an incomplete implementation of the SCEV based code generation.
When finished it will remove the need for -indvars -enable-iv-rewrite.
For the moment it is still disabled. Even though it passes 'make polly-test',
there are still loose ends especially in respect of OpenMP code generation.
llvm-svn: 155717
This fixes two crashes that appeared in case of:
- A load of a non vectorizable type (e.g. float**)
- An instruction that is not vectorizable (e.g. call)
llvm-svn: 154586
Grouped unrolling means that we unroll a loop such that the different instances
of a certain statement are scheduled right after each other, but we do
not generate any vector code. The idea here is that we can schedule the
bb vectorizer right afterwards and use it heuristics to decide when
vectorization should be performed.
llvm-svn: 154251
To avoid overflows we still use a larger type (i64) while calculating the value
of the old ivs. However, we truncate the result to the type of the old iv when
providing it to the new code.
A corresponding test case is added to the polly test suite. Also, a failing test
case is fixed.
This fixes PR12311.
Contributed by: Tsingray Liu <tsingrayliu@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 153952
When deriving new values for the statements of a SCoP, we assumed that parameter
values are constant within the SCoP and consquently do not need to be rewritten.
For OpenMP code generation this assumption is wrong, as such values are not
available in the OpenMP subfunction and consequently also may need to be
rewritten.
Committed with some changes.
Contributed-By: Johannes Doerfert <s9jodoer@stud.uni-saarland.de>
llvm-svn: 153838
Chandler Carruth