This is based on D54720 by Sean Fertile.
When accessing a global symbol which is not defined in the translation unit,
compilers will generate instructions that load the address from the toc entry.
If the symbol is defined, non-preemptable, and addressable with a 32-bit
signed offset from the toc pointer, the address can be computed
directly. e.g.
addis 3, 2, .LC0@toc@ha # R_PPC64_TOC16_HA
ld 3, .LC0@toc@l(3) # R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS, load the address from a .toc entry
ld/lwa 3, 0(3) # load the value from the address
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.LC0: .tc var[TC],var
can be relaxed to
addis 3,2,var@toc@ha # this may be relaxed to a nop,
addi 3,3,var@toc@l # then this becomes addi 3,2,var@toc
ld/lwa 3, 0(3) # load the value from the address
We can delete the test ppc64-got-indirect.s as its purpose is covered by
newly added ppc64-toc-relax.s and ppc64-toc-relax-constants.s
Reviewed By: ruiu, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60958
llvm-svn: 360112
Make some small adjustment while touching the code: make parameters
const, use less_first(), etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60989
llvm-svn: 358943
Summary:
Fixes PR35242. A simplified reproduce:
thread_local int i; int f() { return i; }
% {g++,clang++} -fPIC -shared -ftls-model=local-dynamic -fuse-ld=lld a.cc
ld.lld: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_X86_64_DTPOFF32 against symbol: i in readonly segment; recompile object files with -fPIC or pass '-Wl,-z,notext' to allow text relocations in the output
In isStaticLinkTimeConstant(), Syn.IsPreemptible is true, so it is not
seen as a constant. The error is then issued in processRelocAux().
A symbol of the local-dynamic TLS model cannot be preempted but it can
preempt symbols of the global-dynamic TLS model in other DSOs.
So it makes some sense that the variable is not static.
This patch fixes the linking error by changing getRelExpr() on
R_386_TLS_LDO_32 and R_X86_64_DTPOFF{32,64} from R_ABS to R_DTPREL.
R_PPC64_DTPREL_* and R_MIPS_TLS_DTPREL_* need similar fixes, but they are not handled in this patch.
As a bonus, we use `if (Expr == R_ABS && !Config->Shared)` to find
ld-to-le opportunities. R_ABS is overloaded here for such STT_TLS symbols.
A dedicated R_DTPREL is clearer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60945
llvm-svn: 358870
This is https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=39857.
I added the comment with much more details to the bug page,
the short version is below.
The following script and code demonstrates the issue:
aliasto__text = __text;
SECTIONS {
.text 0x1000 : { __text = . ; *(.text) }
}
...
call aliasto__text
LLD fails with "cannot refer to absolute symbol: aliasto__text" error.
It happens because at the moment of scanning the relocations
we do not yet assign the correct/final/any section value for the symbol aliasto__text.
I made a change to Relocations.cpp to fix that.
Also, I had to remove the symbol-location.s test case completely, because now it does not
trigger any error. Since now all linker scripts symbols are resolved to constants, no
errors can be triggered at all it seems. I checked that it is consistent with the behavior
of bfd and gold (they do not trigger errors for the case from symbol-location.s), so it should
be OK. I.e. at least it is probably not the best possible, but natural behavior we obtained.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55423
llvm-svn: 358652
Summary:
This should address remaining issues discussed in PR36555.
Currently R_GOT*_FROM_END are exclusively used by x86 and x86_64 to
express relocations types relative to the GOT base. We have
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ (GOT base) = start(.got.plt) but end(.got) !=
start(.got.plt)
This can have problems when _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ is used as a symbol, e.g.
glibc dl_machine_dynamic assumes _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ is start(.got.plt),
which is not true.
extern const ElfW(Addr) _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_[] attribute_hidden;
return _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_[0]; // R_X86_64_GOTPC32
In this patch, we
* Change all GOT*_FROM_END to GOTPLT* to fix the problem.
* Add HasGotPltOffRel to denote whether .got.plt should be kept even if
the section is empty.
* Simplify GotSection::empty and GotPltSection::empty by setting
HasGotOffRel and HasGotPltOffRel according to GlobalOffsetTable early.
The change of R_386_GOTPC makes X86::writePltHeader simpler as we don't
have to compute the offset start(.got.plt) - Ebx (it is constant 0).
We still diverge from ld.bfd (at least in most cases) and gold in that
.got.plt and .got are not adjacent, but the advantage doing that is
unclear.
Reviewers: ruiu, sivachandra, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, mehdi_amini, arichardson, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59594
llvm-svn: 356968
Non-GOT non-PLT relocations to non-preemptible ifuncs result in the
creation of a canonical PLT, which now takes the identity of the IFUNC
in the symbol table. This (a) ensures address consistency inside and
outside the module, and (b) fixes a bug where some of these relocations
end up pointing to the resolver.
Fixes (at least) PR40474 and PR40501.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57371
llvm-svn: 353981
A follow up to the intial patch that unblocked linking against libgcc.
For lld we don't need to bother tracking which objects have got based small
code model relocations. This is due to the fact that the compilers on
powerpc64 use the .toc section to generate indirections to symbols (rather then
using got relocations) which keeps the got small. This makes overflowing a
small code model got relocation very unlikely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57245
llvm-svn: 353849
Summary:
R_PPC64_TLSGD and R_PPC64_TLSLD are used as markers on TLS code sequences. After GD-to-IE or GD-to-LE relaxation, the next relocation R_PPC64_REL24 should be skipped to not create a false dependency on __tls_get_addr. When linking statically, the false dependency may cause an "undefined symbol: __tls_get_addr" error.
R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_HA
R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD16_LO
R_PPC64_TLSGD R_TLSDESC_CALL
R_PPC64_REL24 __tls_get_addr
Reviewers: ruiu, sfertile, syzaara, espindola
Reviewed By: sfertile
Subscribers: emaste, nemanjai, arichardson, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits, tamur
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57673
llvm-svn: 353262
Guessing that the slashes used in the scripts SECTION command was causing the
windows related failures in the added test.
Original commit message:
Small code model global variable access on PPC64 has a very limited range of
addressing. The instructions the relocations are used on add an offset in the
range [-0x8000, 0x7FFC] to the toc pointer which points to .got +0x8000, giving
an addressable range of [.got, .got + 0xFFFC]. While user code can be recompiled
with medium and large code models when the binary grows too large for small code
model, there are small code model relocations in the crt files and libgcc.a
which are typically shipped with the distros, and the ABI dictates that linkers
must allow linking of relocatable object files using different code models.
To minimze the chance of relocation overflow, any file that contains a small
code model relocation should have its .toc section placed closer to the .got
then any .toc from a file without small code model relocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56920
llvm-svn: 352071
Small code model global variable access on PPC64 has a very limited range of
addressing. The instructions the relocations are used on add an offset in the
range [-0x8000, 0x7FFC] to the toc pointer which points to .got +0x8000, giving
an addressable range of [.got, .got + 0xFFFC]. While user code can be recompiled
with medium and large code models when the binary grows too large for small code
model, there are small code model relocations in the crt files and libgcc.a
which are typically shipped with the distros, and the ABI dictates that linkers
must allow linking of relocatable object files using different code models.
To minimze the chance of relocation overflow, any file that contains a small
code model relocation should have its .toc section placed closer to the .got
then any .toc from a file without small code model relocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56920
llvm-svn: 351978
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
As a follow on to D56666 (r351186) there is a case when taking the address
of an ifunc when linking -pie that can generate a spurious can't create
dynamic relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol in readonly
segment. Specifically the case is where the ifunc is in the same
translation unit as the address taker, so given -fpie the compiler knows
the ifunc is defined in the executable so it can use a non-got-generating
relocation.
The error message is due to R_AARCH64_PLT_PAGE_PC not being added to
isRelExpr, its non PLT equivalent R_AARCH64_PAGE_PC is already in
isRelExpr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56724
llvm-svn: 351335
r347650 fixed pr38074 for AArch64 for static linking. It added two new
RelExpr instances R_AARCH64_GOT_PAGE_PC_PLT and R_GOT_PLT. These need to be
added to isStaticLinkTimeConstant so that the address of an ifunc can be
taken when building a shared library.
fixes pr40250
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56666
llvm-svn: 351186
Summary:
This is a common error, and because many people don't know what the key
function is, it is sometimes very confusing.
The doc was originally written by Brooks Moses and slightly edited by me.
Reviewers: MaskRay, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, llvm-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55968
llvm-svn: 349941
When we report an error for symbols defined in the linker script,
we do not report the location properly.
For example:
ld.lld: error: relocation R_AARCH64_CALL26 cannot refer to absolute symbol: aliasto__text
>>> defined in <internal>
>>> referenced by rtoabs.o:(.text+0x4)
This patch fixes that.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55360
llvm-svn: 349612
This patch also makes getPltEntryOffset a non-member function because
it doesn't depend on any private members of the TargetInfo class.
I tried a few different ideas, and it seems this change fits in best to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54981
llvm-svn: 347781
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38074.
The issue is that when calling a function, LLD generates a
.got entry that points to the IFUNC resolver function when
instead, it should use the PLT entries properly for
handling the IFUNC.
So we should create a got entry that points to PLT entry,
which itself loads the value from
.got.plt, relocated with R_*_IRELATIVE to make things work.
Patch do that.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54314
llvm-svn: 347650
On PowerPC64, when a function call offset is too large to encode in a call
instruction the address is stored in a table in the data segment. A thunk is
used to load the branch target address from the table relative to the
TOC-pointer and indirectly branch to the callee. When linking position-dependent
code the addresses are stored directly in the table, for position-independent
code the table is allocated and filled in at load time by the dynamic linker.
For position-independent code the branch targets could have gone in the .got.plt
but using the .branch_lt section for both position dependent and position
independent binaries keeps it consitent and helps keep this PPC64 specific logic
seperated from the target-independent code handling the .got.plt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53408
llvm-svn: 346877
Previously, we uncompress all compressed sections before doing anything.
That works, and that is conceptually simple, but that could results in
a waste of CPU time and memory if uncompressed sections are then
discarded or just copied to the output buffer.
In particular, if .debug_gnu_pub{names,types} are compressed and if no
-gdb-index option is given, we wasted CPU and memory because we
uncompress them into newly allocated bufers and then memcpy the buffers
to the output buffer. That temporary buffer was redundant.
This patch changes how to uncompress sections. Now, compressed sections
are uncompressed lazily. To do that, `Data` member of `InputSectionBase`
is now hidden from outside, and `data()` accessor automatically expands
an compressed buffer if necessary.
If no one calls `data()`, then `writeTo()` directly uncompresses
compressed data into the output buffer. That eliminates the redundant
memory allocation and redundant memcpy.
This patch significantly reduces memory consumption (20 GiB max RSS to
15 Gib) for an executable whose .debug_gnu_pub{names,types} are in total
5 GiB in an uncompressed form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52917
llvm-svn: 343979
The GOT is referenced through the symbol _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ .
The relocation added calculates the offset into the global offset table for
the entry of a symbol. In order to get the correct TargetVA I needed to
create an new relocation expression, HEXAGON_GOT. It does
Sym.getGotVA() - In.GotPlt->getVA().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52744
llvm-svn: 343784
This patch splits ThunkCreator::mergeThunks into two smaller functions.
Also adds blank lines to various places so that the code doesn't look
too dense.
llvm-svn: 343732
Summary:
This patch adds a new flag, --warn-ifunc-textrel, to work around a glibc bug. When a code with ifunc symbols is used to produce an object file with text relocations, lld always succeeds. However, if that object file is linked using an old version of glibc, the resultant binary just crashes with segmentation fault when it is run (The bug is going to be corrected as of glibc 2.19).
Since there is no way to tell beforehand what library the object file will be linked against in the future, there does not seem to be a fool-proof way for lld to give an error only in cases where the binary will crash. So, with this change (dated 2018-09-25), lld starts to give a warning, contingent on a new command line flag that does not have a gnu counter part. The default value for --warn-ifunc-textrel is false, so lld behaviour will not change unless the user explicitly asks lld to give a warning. Users that link with a glibc library with version 2.19 or newer, or does not use ifunc symbols, or does not generate object files with text relocations do not need to take any action. Other users may consider to start passing warn-ifunc-textrel to lld to get early warnings.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: grimar, MaskRay, markj, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52430
llvm-svn: 343628
Previously, if you invoke lld's `main` more than once in the same process,
the second invocation could fail or produce a wrong result due to a stale
pointer values of the previous run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52506
llvm-svn: 343009
This patch adds the target call back relaxTlsIeToLe to support TLS relaxation
from initial exec to local exec model.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48091
llvm-svn: 340281
Older Arm architectures do not support the MOVT and MOVW instructions so we
must use an alternative sequence of instructions to transfer control to the
destination.
Assuming at least Armv5 this patch adds support for Thunks that load or add
to the program counter. Note that there are no Armv5 Thumb Thunks as there
is no Thumb branch instruction in Armv5 that supports Thunks. These thunks
will not work for Armv4t (arm7tdmi) as this architecture cannot change state
from using the LDR or ADD instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50077
llvm-svn: 340160
We have a dead piece of code there which is impossible to trigger
using regular objects I believe.
Patch removes it and adds a test case showing how this condition
can be triggered with use of a broken object and crash the linker.
llvm-svn: 339680
The code involved was simply dead. `IgnoreAll` value is used in
`maybeReportUndefined` only which is never called for -r.
And at the same time `IgnoreAll` was set only for -r.
llvm-svn: 339672
That piece of code is really very old and "protected"
from TLS relocations against symbol in non-allocatable sections.
It is useless because normally non-alloc sections have relocations
with allocatable targets, but not the reverse.
And so the code was simply dead.
llvm-svn: 339553
Patch by PkmX.
This patch makes lld recognize RISC-V target and implements basic
relocation for RV32/RV64 (and RVC). This should be necessary for static
linking ELF applications.
The ABI documentation for RISC-V can be found at:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md.
Note that the documentation is far from complete so we had to figure out
some details from bfd.
The patch should be pretty straightforward. Some highlights:
- A new relocation Expr R_RISCV_PC_INDIRECT is added. This is needed as
the low part of a PC-relative relocation is linked to the corresponding
high part (auipc), see:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#pc-relative-symbol-addresses
- LLVM's MC support for RISC-V is very incomplete (we are working on
this), so tests are given in objectyaml format with the original
assembly included in the comments. Once we have complete support for
RISC-V in MC, we can switch to llvm-as/llvm-objdump.
- We don't support linker relaxation for now as it requires greater
changes to lld that is beyond the scope of this patch. Once this is
accepted we can start to work on adding relaxation to lld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39322
llvm-svn: 339364
During copy relocation of a variable defined in a DSO, if a TLS variable in that DSO happens to have the same st_value, it would also be copied. This was unnecessary because the addresses of TLS variables are relative to TLS segment. They don't interfere with non-TLS variables.
This copying behavior can be harmful in the following scenario:
For function-scope thread-local variables with non-trivial constructors,
they have guard variables. In the case of x86_64 general-dynamic model:
template <int N>
void foo() {
thread_local std::string a;
}
GOT[n] R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 guard variable for a
GOT[n+1] R_X86_64_DTPOFF64 guard variable for a
GOT[n+2] R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 a
GOT[n+3] R_X86_64_DTPOFF64 a
a and its guard variable are both represented as TLS variables, which
should be within the same module. If one is copy relocated to the main
module while the other is not, their module ID will mismatch and can
cause access without prior construction.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50289
llvm-svn: 339042
Fangrui Song