proper SSA updating.
This doesn't cause MachineDominators to be recomputed since we are already
requiring MachineLoopInfo which uses dominators as well.
llvm-svn: 117598
Critical edges going into a loop are not as bad as critical exits. We can handle
them by splitting the critical edge, or by having both inside and outside
registers live out of the predecessor.
llvm-svn: 117423
the remainder register.
Example:
bb0:
x = 1
bb1:
use(x)
...
x = 2
jump bb1
When x is isolated in bb1, the inner part breaks into two components, x1 and x2:
bb0:
x0 = 1
bb1:
x1 = x0
use(x1)
...
x2 = 2
x0 = x2
jump bb1
llvm-svn: 117408
When a block has exactly two uses and the register is both live-in and live-out,
don't isolate the block. We would be inserting two copies, so we haven't really
made any progress.
If the live-in and live-out values separate into disconnected components after
splitting, we would be making progress. We can't detect that for now.
llvm-svn: 117169
An exit block with a critical edge must only have predecessors in the loop, or
just before the loop. This guarantees that the inserted copies in the loop
predecessors dominate the exit block.
llvm-svn: 117144
All registers created during splitting or spilling are assigned to the same
stack slot as the parent register.
When splitting or rematting, we may not spill at all. In that case the stack
slot is still assigned, but it will be dead.
llvm-svn: 116546
splitting or spillling, and to help with rematerialization.
Use LiveRangeEdit in InlineSpiller and SplitKit. This will eventually make it
possible to share remat code between InlineSpiller and SplitKit.
llvm-svn: 116543
Before we would also split around a loop if any peripheral block had multiple
uses. This could cause repeated splitting when splitting a different live range
would insert uses into the periphery.
Now -spiller=inline passes the nightly test suite again.
llvm-svn: 116494
functions: computeRemainder and rewrite.
When the remainder breaks up into multiple components, remember to rewrite those
uses as well.
llvm-svn: 116121
connected components. These components should be allocated different virtual
registers because there is no reason for them to be allocated together.
Add the ConnectedVNInfoEqClasses class to calculate the connected components,
and move values to new LiveIntervals.
Use it from SplitKit::rewrite by creating new virtual registers for the
components.
llvm-svn: 116006
never kept after splitting.
Keeping the original interval made sense when the split region doesn't modify
the register, and the original is spilled. We can get the same effect by
detecting reloaded values when spilling around copies.
llvm-svn: 115695
Insert copy after defining instruction.
Fix LiveIntervalMap::extendTo to properly handle live segments starting before
the current basic block.
Make sure the open live range is extended to the inserted copy's use slot.
llvm-svn: 115665
creating it before and subtracting split ranges.
This way, the SSA update code in LiveIntervalMap can properly create and use new
phi values in dupli. Now it is possible to create split regions where a value
escapes along two different CFG edges, creating phi values outside the split
region.
This is a work in progress and probably quite broken.
llvm-svn: 114492
great deal because we don't have to worry about maintaining SSA form.
Unconditionally copy back to dupli when the register is live out of the split
range, even if the live-out value was defined outside the range. Skipping the
back-copy only makes sense when the live range is going to spill outside the
split range, and we don't know that it will. Besides, this was a hack to avoid
SSA update issues.
Clear up some confusion about the end point of a half-open LiveRange. Methinks
LiveRanges need to be closed so both start and end are included in the range.
The low bits of a SlotIndex are symbolic, so a half-open range doesn't really
make sense. This would be a pervasive change, though.
llvm-svn: 114043
The Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.30319.01
implements parts of C++0x based on the draft standard. An old version of
the draft had a bug that makes std::pair<T1*, T2*>(something, 0) fail to
compile. This is because the template<class U, class V> pair(U&& x, V&& y)
constructor is selected, even though it later fails to implicitly convert
U and V to frist_type and second_type.
This has been fixed in n3090, but it seems that Microsoft is not going to
update msvc.
llvm-svn: 111535
We must complete the DFS, otherwise we might miss needed phi-defs, and
prematurely color live ranges with a non-dominating value.
This is not a big deal since we get to color more of the CFG and the next
mapValue call will be faster.
llvm-svn: 111397
LiveIntervalMap maps values from a parent LiveInterval to a child interval that
is a strict subset. It will create phi-def values as needed to preserve the
VNInfo SSA form in the child interval.
This leads to an algorithm very similar to the one in SSAUpdaterImpl.h, but with
enough differences that the code can't be reused:
- We don't need to manipulate PHI instructions.
- LiveIntervals have kills.
- We have MachineDominatorTree.
- We can use df_iterator.
llvm-svn: 111393
The earliestStart argument is entirely specific to linear scan allocation, and
can be easily calculated by RegAllocLinearScan.
Replace std::vector with SmallVector.
llvm-svn: 111055
When a live range is contained a single block, we can split it around
instruction clusters. The current approach is very primitive, splitting before
and after the largest gap between uses.
llvm-svn: 111043
numbers match. The old check could accidentally leave holes in openli.
Also let useIntv add all ranges for the phi-def value inserted by
enterIntvAtEnd. This works as long at the value mapping is established in
enterIntvAtEnd.
llvm-svn: 110995
This can happen if the original interval has been broken into two disconnected
parts. Ideally, we should be able to detect when the graph is disconnected and
create separate intervals, but that code is not implemented yet.
Example:
Two basic blocks are both branching to a loop header. Our interval is defined in
both basic blocks, and live into the loop along both edges.
We decide to split the interval around the loop. The interval is split into an
inside part and an outside part. The outside part now has two disconnected
segments, one in each basic block.
If we later decide to split the outside interval into single blocks, we get one
interval per basic block and an empty dupli for the remainder.
llvm-svn: 110976
Before spilling a live range, we split it into a separate range for each basic
block where it is used. That way we only get one reload per basic block if the
new smaller ranges can allocate to a register.
This type of splitting is already present in the standard spiller.
llvm-svn: 110934
When splitting a live range, the new registers have fewer uses and the
permissible register class may be less constrained. Recompute the register class
constraint from the uses of new registers created for a split. This may let them
be allocated from a larger set, possibly avoiding a spill.
llvm-svn: 110703
necessary.
Sometimes, live range splitting doesn't shrink the current interval, but simply
changes some instructions to use a new interval. That makes the original more
suitable for spilling. In this case, we don't need to duplicate the original.
llvm-svn: 110481
After heavy editing of a live interval, it is much easier to simply renumber the
live values instead of trying to keep track of the unused ones.
llvm-svn: 110463
This is a work in progress. So far we have some basic loop analysis to help
determine where it is useful to split a live range around a loop.
The actual loop splitting code from Splitter.cpp is also going to move in here.
llvm-svn: 108842
Jakob Stoklund Olesen