This patch adds support for DWARF attribute DW_AT_rank.
Summary:
Fortran assumed rank arrays have dynamic rank. DWARF attribute
DW_AT_rank is needed to support that.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89141
This removes "VerifyEachPass" parameters from a lot of functions which is nice.
Don't verify after special passes or VerifierPass.
This introduces verification on loop and cgscc passes, verifying the corresponding function/module.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88764
After some recent upstream discussion we decided that it was best
to avoid having the / operator for both ElementCount and TypeSize,
since this could give the impression that these classes can be used
in the same way as basic integer integer types. However, division
for scalable types is a bit odd because we are only dividing the
minimum quantity by a value, as opposed to something like:
(MinSize * Vscale) / SomeValue
This is why when performing division it's important the caller
first establishes whether the operation makes sense, perhaps by
calling isKnownMultipleOf() prior to division. The caller must now
explictly call divideCoefficientBy() on the class to perform the
operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87700
Introduce a helper which can be used to update the debug location of an
Instruction after the instruction is hoisted. This can be used to safely
drop a source location as recommended by the docs.
For more context, see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85670
I have long complained that while we have exhaustive tests
for ConstantRange, they are, uh, not good.
The approach of groking our own constant range
via exhaustive enumeration is, mysterious.
It neither tells us without doubt that the result is
conservatively correct, nor the precise match to the ConstantRange
result tells us that the result is precise.
But yeah, it's fast, i give it that.
In short, there are three things that we need to check:
1. That ConstantRange result is conservatively correct
2. That ConstantRange range is reasonable
3. That ConstantRange result is reasonably precise
So let's not just check the middle one, but all three.
This provides precision test coverage for D88178.
This is in preparation for supporting -debugify-each, which adds a debug
info pass before and after each pass.
Switch VerifyEach to use this.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88107
Similar to the ConstantRange::getActiveBits(), and to similarly-named
methods in APInt, returns the bitwidth needed to represent
the given signed constant range
Much like APInt::getActiveBits(), computes how many bits are needed
to be able to represent every value in this constant range,
treating the values as unsigned.
Use the fact that `~X` is equivalent to `-1 - X`, which gives us
fully-precise answer, and we only need to special-handle the wrapped case.
This fires ~16k times for vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed.
This patch changes ElementCount so that the Min and Scalable
members are now private and can only be accessed via the get
functions getKnownMinValue() and isScalable(). In addition I've
added some other member functions for more commonly used operations.
Hopefully this makes the class more useful and will reduce the
need for calling getKnownMinValue().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86065
Both AfterPass and AfterPassInvalidated pass instrumentation
callbacks get additional parameter of type PreservedAnalyses.
This patch was created by @fedor.sergeev. I have just slightly
changed it.
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81555
The current demand propagator for addition will mark all input bits at and right of the alive output bit as alive. But carry won't propagate beyond a bit for which both operands are zero (or one/zero in the case of subtraction) so a more accurate answer is possible given known bits.
I derived a propagator by working through truth tables and using a bit-reversed addition to make demand ripple to the right, but I'm not sure how to make a convincing argument for its correctness in the comments yet. Nevertheless, here's a minimal implementation and test to get feedback.
This would help in a situation where, for example, four bytes (<128) packed into an int are added with four others SIMD-style but only one of the four results is actually read.
Known A: 0_______0_______0_______0_______
Known B: 0_______0_______0_______0_______
AOut: 00000000001000000000000000000000
AB, current: 00000000001111111111111111111111
AB, patch: 00000000001111111000000000000000
Committed on behalf of: @rrika (Erika)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72423
Introduce a helper on Instruction which can be used to update the debug
location after hoisting.
Use this in GVN and LICM, where we were mistakenly introducing new line
0 locations after hoisting (the docs recommend dropping the location in
this case).
For more context, see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85670
I skimmed the existing users of these matchers and don't see any problems
(eg, the caller assumes the matched value was a select instruction without checking).
So I think we can generalize the matching to allow the new intrinsics or the cmp+select idioms.
I did not find any unit tests for the matchers, so added some basics there. The instsimplify
tests are adapted from existing tests for the cmp+select pattern and cover the folds in
simplifyICmpWithMinMax().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85230
The strictfp attribute is required on all function calls in a function
that is itself marked with the strictfp attribute. The IRBuilder knows
this and has a method for adding the attribute to function call instructions.
If a function being called has the strictfp attribute itself then the
IRBuilder will refuse to add the attribute to the calling instruction
despite being asked to add it. Eliminate this error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84878
TODO
* PrintIRInstrumentation and TimePassesHandler would be using this new callback.
* "Running pass" logging will also be moved to use this callback.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84772
Summary:
Try not to resize vector of call records in a call graph node when
replacing call edge. That would prevent invalidation of iterators
stored in the CG SCC pass manager's scc_iterator.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84295
Summary:
This support is needed for the Fortran array variables with pointer/allocatable
attribute. This support enables debugger to identify the status of variable
whether that is currently allocated/associated.
for pointer array (before allocation/association)
without DW_AT_associated
(gdb) pt ptr
type = integer (140737345375288:140737354129776)
(gdb) p ptr
value requires 35017956 bytes, which is more than max-value-size
with DW_AT_associated
(gdb) pt ptr
type = integer (:)
(gdb) p ptr
$1 = <not associated>
for allocatable array (before allocation)
without DW_AT_allocated
(gdb) pt arr
type = integer (140737345375288:140737354129776)
(gdb) p arr
value requires 35017956 bytes, which is more than max-value-size
with DW_AT_allocated
(gdb) pt arr
type = integer, allocatable (:)
(gdb) p arr
$1 = <not allocated>
Testing
- unit test cases added
- check-llvm
- check-debuginfo
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83544
A pass declares itself unskippable by defining a method `static bool isRequired()`.
Also, this patch makes pass managers and adaptor passes required (unskippable).
PassInstrumentation before-pass-callbacks could be used to skip passes by returning false.
However, some passes should not be skipped at all. Especially so for special-purpose passes such as pass managers and adaptor passes since if they are skipped for any reason, the passes contained by them would also be skipped ignoring contained passes's return value of `isRequired()`.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82344
The approach is simple: if a pass reports that it's not modifying a
Function/Module, compute a loose hash of that Function/Module and compare it
with the original one. If we report no change but there's a hash change, then we
have an error.
This approach misses a lot of change but it's not super intrusive and can
detect most of the simple mistakes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80916
The approach is simple: if a pass reports that it's not modifying a
Function/Module, compute a loose hash of that Function/Module and compare it
with the original one. If we report no change but there's a hash change, then we
have an error.
This approach misses a lot of change but it's not super intrusive and can
detect most of the simple mistakes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80916
Summary:
Make Constant::getSplatValue recognize scalable vector splats of the
form created by ConstantVector::getSplat. Add unit test to verify that
C == ConstantVector::getSplat(C)->getSplatValue() for fixed width and
scalable vector splats
Reviewers: efriedma, spatel, fpetrogalli, c-rhodes
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: sdesmalen, tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82416
Summary:
Avoid exposing details about how roots are stored. This enables subsequent
type-erasure changes.
v5:
- cleanup a unit test by using EXPECT_EQ instead of EXPECT_TRUE
Change-Id: I532b774cc71f2224e543bc7d79131d97f63f093d
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, hiraditya, kuhar, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83085
Summary:
D80831 changed part of the prefix usage for AIX.
But there are other places getting prefix from DataLayout.
This patch intends to make prefix usage consistent on AIX.
Reviewed by: hubert.reinterpretcast, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81270
Currently, there doesn't seem to be any way to look up a Value*
in a map/set indexed by AssertingVH/PoisoningVH, without creating
a value handle -- which is fairly expensive, because it involves
adding the value handle to the use list and immediately removing
it again. Using find_as(Value *) does not work (and is in fact
worse than just using find(Value *)), because it will end up
creating multiple value handles during the lookup itself.
For AssertingVH, address this by simply using DenseMapInfo<T *>
instead of manually implementing something. The AssertingVH<T>
will now get coerced to T*, rather than the other way around.
For PoisoningVH, add extra overloads of getHashValue() and
isEqual() that accept a T* argument.
This allows using find_as(Value *) to perform efficient lookups
in assertion-enabled builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81793
This patch fixes VPIntrinsic::canIgnoreVectorLength when used on a
VPIntrinsic with scalable vector types. Also includes new unittest cases
for the '<vscale x 1 x whatever>' and '%evl == vscale' corner cases.
Summary:
The working set size heuristics (ProfileSummaryInfo::hasHugeWorkingSetSize)
under the partial sample PGO may not be accurate because the profile is partial
and the number of hot profile counters in the ProfileSummary may not reflect the
actual working set size of the program being compiled.
To improve this, the (approximated) ratio of the the number of profile counters
of the program being compiled to the number of profile counters in the partial
sample profile is computed (which is called the partial profile ratio) and the
working set size of the profile is scaled by this ratio to reflect the working
set size of the program being compiled and used for the working set size
heuristics.
The partial profile ratio is approximated based on the number of the basic
blocks in the program and the NumCounts field in the ProfileSummary and computed
through the thin LTO indexing. This means that there is the limitation that the
scaled working set size is available to the thin LTO post link passes only.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, eraman, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79831
This patch upgrades DISubrange to support fortran requirements.
Summary:
Below are the updates/addition of fields.
lowerBound - Now accepts signed integer or DIVariable or DIExpression,
earlier it accepted only signed integer.
upperBound - This field is now added and accepts signed interger or
DIVariable or DIExpression.
stride - This field is now added and accepts signed interger or
DIVariable or DIExpression.
This is required to describe bounds of array which are known at runtime.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check clang
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80197
This intrinsic implements IEEE-754 operation roundToIntegralTiesToEven,
and performs rounding to the nearest integer value, rounding halfway
cases to even. The intrinsic represents the missed case of IEEE-754
rounding operations and now llvm provides full support of the rounding
operations defined by the standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75670
Alok Kumar Sharma