attached. Since we do not support any attributes which appertain to a statement
(yet), testing of this is necessarily quite minimal.
Patch by Alexander Kornienko!
llvm-svn: 154723
shadow of a block expression with non-trivial destructed cleanups,
we should flag that in the enclosing function, not in the block
that we're about to pop.
llvm-svn: 154646
The codepath already only works for source bits > target bits, it's just that
it was testing for the source expr bits to be exactly 64. This meant simple
cases (int i = x_long / 2) were missed & ended up under the general
-Wconversion warning, which a user might not have enabled.
llvm-svn: 154626
in general (such an atomic has boolean representation) and
specifically for IR generation of __c11_atomic_init. The latter also
means actually using initialization semantics for this initialization,
rather than just creating a store.
On a related note, make sure we actually put in non-atomic-to-atomic
conversions when performing an implicit conversion sequence. IR
generation is far too kind here, but we still want the ASTs to make
sense.
llvm-svn: 154612
types. The second and third conversions in the sequence are based on
the conversion for the underlying type, so that we get sensible
overloading behavior for, e.g., _Atomic(int) vs. _Atomic(float).
As part of this, actually implement the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion
for atomic types. There is probably a pile of code in SemaExpr that
can now be deleted, but I haven't tracked it down yet.
llvm-svn: 154596
This is not quite sufficient for libstdc++'s <atomic>: we still need
__atomic_test_and_set and __atomic_clear, and may need a more complete
__atomic_is_lock_free implementation.
We are also missing an implementation of __atomic_always_lock_free,
__atomic_nand_fetch, and __atomic_fetch_nand, but those aren't needed
for libstdc++.
llvm-svn: 154579
<stdatomic.h> header.
In passing, fix LanguageExtensions to note that C11 and C++11 are no longer
"upcoming standards" but are now actually standardized.
llvm-svn: 154513
code-completion related strings specific to a translation unit (ASTContext and related data)
CodeCompletionAllocator does such limited caching, by caching the name assigned
to a DeclContext*, but that is not the appropriate place since that object has
a lifetime that can extend beyond that of an ASTContext.
Introduce CodeCompletionTUInfo which will be always tied to a translation unit
to do this kind of caching and move the caching of CodeCompletionAllocator into this
object, and propagate it to all the places where it will be needed.
The plan is to extend the caching where appropriate, using CodeCompletionTUInfo,
to avoid re-calculating code-completion strings.
Part of rdar://10796159.
llvm-svn: 154408
base-class subojects.
Incidentally, thinking about virtual bases makes it clear to me that
we're not appropriately computing the access to the virtual base's
member because we're not computing the best possible access to the
virtual base at all; in fact, we're basically assuming it's public.
I'll file a separate PR about that.
llvm-svn: 154346
to define a special member function as deleted so that it properly
establishes an object context for the accesses to the base subobject
members.
llvm-svn: 154343
Specifically, using a an integer outside [0, 1] as a boolean constant seems to
be an easy mistake to make with things like "x == a || b" where the author
intended "x == a || x == b".
The bug caused by calling SkipUntil with three token kinds was also identified
by a VC diagnostic & reported by Francois Pichet as review feedback for my
commit r154163. I've included test cases to verify the error recovery that was
broken/poorly implemented due to this bug.
The other fix (lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp) seems like that code was never actually
reached in any of Clang's tests & is related to Objective C features I'm not
familiar with, so I've not been able to construct a test case for it. Perhaps
someone else can.
llvm-svn: 154325
- The [class.protected] restriction is non-trivial for any instance
member, even if the access lacks an object (for example, if it's
a pointer-to-member constant). In this case, it is equivalent to
requiring the naming class to equal the context class.
- The [class.protected] restriction applies to accesses to constructors
and destructors. A protected constructor or destructor can only be
used to create or destroy a base subobject, as a direct result.
- Several places were dropping or misapplying object information.
The standard could really be much clearer about what the object type is
supposed to be in some of these accesses. Usually it's easy enough to
find a reasonable answer, but still, the standard makes a very confident
statement about accesses to instance members only being possible in
either pointer-to-member literals or member access expressions, which
just completely ignores concepts like constructor and destructor
calls, using declarations, unevaluated field references, etc.
llvm-svn: 154248
the template instantiation of statement-expressions.
I think it was jyasskin who had a crashing testcase in this area;
hopefully this fixes it and he can find his testcase and check it in.
llvm-svn: 154189
The warning this inhibits, -Wobjc-root-class, is opt-in for now. However, all clang unit tests that would trigger
the warning have been updated to use -Wno-objc-root-class. <rdar://problem/7446698>
llvm-svn: 154187
* s/nonstatic/non-static/ in the diagnostics, since the latter form outvoted
the former by 28-2 in our diagnostics.
* Fix the "use of member in static member function" diagnostic to correctly
detect this situation inside a block or lambda.
* Produce a more specific "invalid use of non-static member" diagnostic for
the case where a nested class member refers to a member of a
lexically-surrounding class.
llvm-svn: 154073
number + context) to the point where we initially start defining the
lambda, so that the linkage won't change when that information is made
available. Fixes the assertion in <rdar://problem/11182962>.
Plus, actually mangle the context of lambdas properly.
llvm-svn: 154029
a type specifier and can be combined with unsigned. This allows libstdc++4.7 to
be used with clang in c++98 mode.
Several other changes are still required for libstdc++4.7 to work with clang in
c++11 mode.
llvm-svn: 153999
be sure to perform the argument type adjustments in
[temp.deduct.call]p2, e.g., array decay.
And, when performing these deductions in the context of 'auto', make
sure that we're deducing the P' in std::initializer_list<P'> rather
than the whole initializer list.
Together, this makes code like
for( auto s : {"Deferred", "New", "Open", "Review"}) { }
work properly.
llvm-svn: 153998
for converting an empty list to a scalar, be sure to initialize
the source and destination types so that comparison of conversion
sequences will work in case there are multiple viable candidates.
llvm-svn: 153993
keep the latter.
No test. This was noticed when poking around something else with GDB. I'm not
able to figure out a testcase that would break due to this bug. Sorry.
llvm-svn: 153992
Benjamin Kramer