EXTRACT_SUBREG no longer appears as a machine instruction. Use COPY instead.
Add isCopy() checks in many places using isMoveInstr() and isExtractSubreg().
The isMoveInstr hook will be removed later.
llvm-svn: 107879
%reg1025 = <sext> %reg1024
...
%reg1026 = SUBREG_TO_REG 0, %reg1024, 4
into this:
%reg1025 = <sext> %reg1024
...
%reg1027 = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1025, 4
%reg1026 = SUBREG_TO_REG 0, %reg1027, 4
The problem here is that SUBREG_TO_REG is there to assert that an implicit zext
occurs. It doesn't insert a zext instruction. If we allow the EXTRACT_SUBREG
here, it will give us the value after the <sext>, not the original value of
%reg1024 before <sext>.
llvm-svn: 105741
into TargetOpcodes.h. #include the new TargetOpcodes.h
into MachineInstr. Add new inline accessors (like isPHI())
to MachineInstr, and start using them throughout the
codebase.
llvm-svn: 95687
For now, this pass is fairly conservative. It only perform the replacement when both the pre- and post- extension values are used in the block. It will miss cases where the post-extension values are live, but not used.
llvm-svn: 93278
Jakob Stoklund Olesen