When suggesting "foo::bar" as a correction for "fob::bar" we mistakenly
replaced only "bar" with "foo::bar" producing "fob::foo::bar" which was broken.
This corrects that replacement in as many places as I could find & provides
test cases for all those cases I could find a test case for. There are a couple
that don't seem to be reachable (one looks entirely dead, the other just
doesn't seem to ever get called with a namespace to namespace change).
Review by Richard Smith ( http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D57 ).
llvm-svn: 165817
This only applies if the type has a name. (we could potentially do something
crazy with decltype in C++11 to qualify members of unnamed types but that
seems excessive)
It might be nice to also suggest a fixit for "&this->i", "&foo->i",
and "&foo.i" but those expressions produce 'bound' member functions that have
a different AST representation & make error recovery a little trickier. Left
as future work.
llvm-svn: 165763
have PPCallbacks::InclusionDirective pass the character range for the filename quotes or brackets.
rdar://11113134 & http://llvm.org/PR13880
llvm-svn: 164743
start of a statement or the end of a compound-statement, diagnose the comma as
a typo for a semicolon. Patch by Ahmed Bougacha! Additional test cases and
minor refactoring by me.
llvm-svn: 164085
warning to an error. C++ bans it, and both GCC and EDG diagnose it as
an error. Microsoft allows it, so we still warn in Microsoft
mode. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
llvm-svn: 163831
These types are defined differently on 32-bit and 64-bit platforms, and
trying to offer a fixit for one platform would only mess up the format
string for the other. The Apple-recommended solution is to cast to a type
that is known to be large enough and always use that to print the value.
This should only have an impact on compile time if the format string is
incorrect; in cases where the format string matches the definition on the
current platform, no warning will be emitted.
<rdar://problem/9135072&12164284>
llvm-svn: 163266
accurate by asking the parser whether there was an ambiguity rather than trying
to reverse-engineer it from the DeclSpec. Make the with-parameters case have
better diagnostics by using semantic information to drive the warning,
improving the diagnostics and adding a fixit.
Patch by Nikola Smiljanic. Some minor changes by me to suppress diagnostics for
declarations of the form 'T (*x)(...)', which seem to have a very high false
positive rate, and to reduce indentation in 'warnAboutAmbiguousFunction'.
llvm-svn: 160998
This time, make sure we don't try to print fixits with newline characters,
since they don't have a valid column width, and they don't look good anyway.
PR13417 (and originally <rdar://problem/11877454>)
llvm-svn: 160561
Recovering as if the user had actually called -isEqual: is a bit too far from
the semantics of the program as written, /even though/ it's probably what they
intended.
llvm-svn: 160377
This code is very sensitive to the difference between "columns" as printed
and "bytes" (SourceManager columns). All variables are now named explicitly
and our assumptions are (hopefully) documented as both comment and assertion.
Whether parseable fixits should use byte offsets or Unicode character counts
is pending discussion on the mailing list; currently the implementation uses
bytes (and has no problems on lines containing multibyte characters).
This has been added to the user manual.
<rdar://problem/11877454>
llvm-svn: 160319
If a non-unicode locale is used, the unicode character is escaped and any
byte that is in the escaped representation but not the semicolon will
become whitespace.
llvm-svn: 160113
Chris pointed out that while the comparison is certainly problematic
and does not have well-defined behavior, it isn't any worse than some
of the other abuses that we merely warn about and doesn't need to make
the compilation fail.
Revert the release notes change (r159766) now that this is just a new warning.
llvm-svn: 159939
also deal with '>>>' (in CUDA), '>=', and '>>='. Fix the FixItHints logic to
deal with cases where the token is followed by an adjacent '=', '==', '>=',
'>>=', or '>>>' token, where a naive fix-it would result in a differing token
stream on a re-lex.
llvm-svn: 158652
Objective-C literals conceptually always create new objects, but may be
optimized by the compiler or runtime (constant folding, singletons, etc).
Comparing addresses of these objects is relying on this optimization
behavior, which is really an implementation detail.
In the case of == and !=, offer a fixit to a call to -isEqual:, if the
method is available. This fixit is directly on the error so that it is
automatically applied.
Most of the time, this is really a newbie mistake, hence the fixit.
llvm-svn: 158230
This is mainly for attempting to recover in cases where a class provides
a custom operator-> and a '.' was accidentally used instead of '->' when
accessing a member of the object returned by the current object's
operator->.
llvm-svn: 155580
followed by an identifier as declaration specificer (except for ObjC).
This allows e.g. an out-of-line C++ member function definitions to be
recognized as functions and not as variable declarations if the type
name for the first parameter is not recognized as a type--say, when there
is a function name shadowing an enum type name and the parameter is
missing the "enum" keyword needed to distinguish the two.
Note that returning TPResult::Error() instead of TPResult::True()
appears to have the same end result, while TPResult::Ambiguous()
results in a crash.
llvm-svn: 155163
The warning this inhibits, -Wobjc-root-class, is opt-in for now. However, all clang unit tests that would trigger
the warning have been updated to use -Wno-objc-root-class. <rdar://problem/7446698>
llvm-svn: 154187
Based on Doug's feedback to r153887 this omits the FixIt if the following token
isn't syntactically valid for the context. (not a comma, '...', identifier,
'>', or '>>')
There's a bunch of work to handle the '>>' case, but it makes for a much more
pleasant diagnostic in this case.
llvm-svn: 154163
Infinite recursion was happening when DiagnoseInvalidRedeclaration
called ActOnFunctionDeclarator to check if a typo correction works when
the correction was just to the nested-name-specifier because the wrong
DeclContext was being passed in. Unlike a number of functions
surrounding typo correction, the DeclContext passed in for a function is
the context of the function name after applying any nested name
specifiers, not the lexical DeclContext where the
function+nested-name-specifier appears.
llvm-svn: 153962
Eli Friedman