if it returns eExpressionCompleted. Don't try to get the error
from the ValueObjectSP if that's not true.
I just have a report of this from the field, I don't know how
to make it fail yet.
<rdar://problem/29113004>
llvm-svn: 286170
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
The result variables aren't useful, and if you have a breakpoint on a
common function you can generate a lot of these. So I changed the
code that checks the condition to set ResultVariableIsInternal in the
EvaluateExpressionOptions that we pass to the execution.
Unfortunately, the check for this variable was done in the wrong place
(the static UserExpression::Evaluate) which is not how breakpoint
conditions execute expressions (UserExpression::Execute). So I moved
the check to UserExpression::Execute (which Evaluate also calls) and made the
overridden method DoExecute.
llvm-svn: 266093
quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits.
Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression
to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present.
<rdar://problem/25351938>
llvm-svn: 264793
This feature is controlled by an expression command option, a target property and the
SBExpressionOptions setting. FixIt's are only applied to UserExpressions, not UtilityFunctions,
those you have to get right when you make them.
This is just a first stage. At present the fixits are applied silently. The next step
is to tell the user about the applied fixit.
<rdar://problem/25351938>
llvm-svn: 264379
a way for compilation to take a "thread to use for compilation". If it isn't set then the
compilation will use the currently selected thread. This should help keep function execution
to the one thread intended.
llvm-svn: 263972
We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating
expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all
errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave
all of them.
To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which
contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression
is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as
to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the
errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors
to the user.
This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to
thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I
also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing
newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead
pass the Severity flag.
The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the
MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously
printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase.
<rdar://problem/22864976>
llvm-svn: 263859
The Go interpreter doesn't JIT or use LLVM, so this also
moves all the JIT related code from UserExpression to a new class LLVMUserExpression.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13073
Fix merge
llvm-svn: 251820
A REPL takes over the command line and typically treats input as source code.
REPLs can also do code completion. The REPL class allows its subclasses to
implement the language-specific functionality without having to know about the
IOHandler-specific internals.
Also added a PluginManager-based way of getting to a REPL given a language and
a target.
Also brought in some utility code and expression options that are useful for
REPLs, such as line offsets for expressions, ANSI terminal coloring of errors,
and a few IOHandler convenience functions.
llvm-svn: 250753
When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language
is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running
SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes
this.
Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com
Reviewed by: dawn
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267
llvm-svn: 249624
The concept here is that languages may have different ways of communicating
results. In particular, languages may have different names for their result
variables and in fact may have multiple types of result variables (e.g.,
error results). Materializer was tied to one specific model of result handling.
Instead, now UserExpressions can register their own handlers for the result
variables they inject. This allows language-specific code in Materializer to
be moved into the expression parser plug-in, and it simplifies Materializer.
These delegates are subclasses of PersistentVariableDelegate.
PersistentVariableDelegate can provide the name of the result variable, and is
notified when the result variable is populated. It can also be used to touch
persistent variables if need be, updating language-specific state. The
UserExpression owns the delegate and can decide on its result based on
consulting all of its (potentially multiple) delegates.
The user expression itself now makes the determination of what the final result
of the expression is, rather than relying on the Materializer, and I've added a
virtual function to UserExpression to allow this.
llvm-svn: 249233
Also added some target-level search functions so that persistent variables and
symbols can be searched for without hand-iterating across the map of
TypeSystems.
llvm-svn: 249027
the corresponding TypeSystem. This makes sense because what kind of data there
is -- and how it can be looked up -- depends on the language.
Functionality that is common to all type systems is factored out into
PersistentExpressionState.
llvm-svn: 248934
There are still a bunch of dependencies on the plug-in, but this helps to
identify them.
There are also a few more bits we need to move (and abstract, for example the
ClangPersistentVariables).
llvm-svn: 248612
Summary:
With the recent changes to separate clang from the core structures
of LLDB, many inclusions of clang headers can be removed.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12954
llvm-svn: 248004
Before we had:
ClangFunction
ClangUtilityFunction
ClangUserExpression
and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression
base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds:
FunctionCaller
UtilityFunction
UserExpression
You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage.
The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches
the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it.
Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way,
I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper
that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types.
Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs.
The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller
to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a
FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions.
Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common
JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency
but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary.
llvm-svn: 247720
Zachary Turner