diagnostic to include the full instantiation location for the
invalid paste. For:
#define foo(a, b) a ## b
#define bar(x) foo(x, ])
bar(a)
bar(zdy)
Instead of:
t.c:3:22: error: pasting formed 'a]', an invalid preprocessing token
#define foo(a, b) a ## b
^
t.c:3:22: error: pasting formed 'zdy]', an invalid preprocessing token
we now produce:
t.c:7:1: error: pasting formed 'a]', an invalid preprocessing token
bar(a)
^
t.c:4:16: note: instantiated from:
#define bar(x) foo(x, ])
^
t.c:3:22: note: instantiated from:
#define foo(a, b) a ## b
^
t.c:8:1: error: pasting formed 'zdy]', an invalid preprocessing token
bar(zdy)
^
t.c:4:16: note: instantiated from:
#define bar(x) foo(x, ])
^
t.c:3:22: note: instantiated from:
#define foo(a, b) a ## b
^
llvm-svn: 72519
1. When we accept "#garbage" in asm-with-cpp mode, change the token kind
of the # to unknown so that the preprocessor won't try to process it as
a real #. This fixes a crash on the attached example
2. Fix macro definition extents processing to handle #foo at the end of a
macro to say the definition ends with the foo, not the #.
This is a follow-on fix to r72283, and rdar://6916026
llvm-svn: 72388
two empty arguments. Also, add an assert so that this bug
manifests as an assertion failure, not a valgrind problem.
This fixes rdar://6880648 - [cpp] crash in ArgNeedsPreexpansion
llvm-svn: 71616
that if we're going to print an extension warning anyway,
there's no point to changing behavior based on NoExtensions: it will
only make error recovery worse.
Note that this doesn't cause any behavior change because NoExtensions
isn't used by the current front-end. I'm still considering what to do about
the remaining use of NoExtensions in IdentifierTable.cpp.
llvm-svn: 70273
PCH file. In the Cocoa-prefixed "Hello, World" benchmark, this takes
us from reading 503 identifiers down to 37 and from 470 macros down to
4. It also results in an 8% performance improvement.
llvm-svn: 70094
will let us test for multiple different warning modes in the same
file in regression tests.
This implements rdar://2362963, a 10-year old feature request :)
llvm-svn: 69560
support it. I don't know what evaluation method we use for complex
arithmetic, so I don't know whether/if we should warn about use of
CX_LIMITED_RANGE.
This concludes my planned hacking on STDC pragmas, flame away :)
llvm-svn: 69556
in a function-like macro body. This has the added bonus of moving some
function-like macro specific code out of the object-like macro codepath.
llvm-svn: 69530
as decimal, even if it starts with 0. Also, since things like 0x1 are
completely illegal, don't even bother using numericliteralparser for them.
llvm-svn: 69454
Eli Friedman