Translating between JSON objects and C++ strutctures is common.
From experience in clangd, fromJSON/ObjectMapper work well and save a lot of
code, but aren't adopted elsewhere at least partly due to total lack of error
reporting beyond "ok"/"bad".
The recently-added error model should be rich enough for most applications.
It requires tracking the path within the root object and reporting local
errors at appropriate places.
To do this, we exploit the fact that the call graph of recursive
parse functions mirror the structure of the JSON itself.
The current path is represented as a linked list of segments, each of which is
on the stack as a parameter. Concretely, fromJSON now looks like:
bool fromJSON(const Value&, T&, Path);
Beyond the signature change, this is reasonably unobtrusive: building
the path segments is mostly handled by ObjectMapper and the vector<T> fromJSON.
However the root caller of fromJSON must now create a Root object to
store the errors, which is a little clunky.
I've added high-level parse<T>(StringRef) -> Expected<T>, but it's not
general enough to be the primary interface I think (at least, not usable in
clangd).
All existing users (mostly just clangd) are updated in this patch,
making this change backwards-compatible is a bit hairy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88103
Summary:
The Token objects are relatively expensive and we were spending a lot of
CPU creating them for each trigram emitted. Instead, use a tiny trigram
structure until we're ready to finalize the index.
This improves the new BuildDex benchmark by 20%. This code is hot and on
the critical path in clangd: it runs after a new preamble is built.
Reviewers: kbobyrev
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79918
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Standardize on the most common namespace setup in our *.cpp files:
using namespace llvm;
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(StringRef) { ... }
And remove redundant llvm:: qualifiers. (Except for cases like
make_unique where this causes problems with std:: and ADL).
This choice is pretty arbitrary, but some broad consistency is nice.
This is going to conflict with everything. Sorry :-/
Squash the other configurations:
A)
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace clangd;
void clangd::foo(StringRef);
This is in some of the older files. (It prevents accidentally defining a
new function instead of one in the header file, for what that's worth).
B)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(llvm::StringRef) { ... }
This is fine, but in practice the using directive often gets added over time.
C)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm; // inside the namespace
This was pretty common, but is a bit misleading: name lookup preferrs
clang::clangd::foo > clang::foo > llvm:: foo (no matter where the using
directive is).
llvm-svn: 344850
Summary:
Interface is in one file, implementation in two as they have little in common.
A couple of ad-hoc YAML functions left exposed:
- symbol -> YAML I expect to keep for tools like dexp
- YAML -> symbol is used for the MR-style indexer, I think we can eliminate
this (merge-on-the-fly, else use a different serialization)
Reviewers: kbobyrev
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52453
llvm-svn: 342999
After `FuzzyFindRequest` JSON (de)serialization was introduced, it
should replace ad-hoc fuzzy-find request parsing implemented in the
IndexBenchmark driver.
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51971
llvm-svn: 342137
This patch introduces index benchmarks on top of the proposed LLVM
benchmark pull.
Reviewed By: sammccall, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51090
llvm-svn: 342026
Sam McCall