allow this, and we should warn on it, but it turns out that people were already
relying on this.
We should introduce a -Wgcc-compat warning for this if the attributes are known
to GCC, but we don't currently track enough information about attributes to do
so reliably.
llvm-svn: 200045
member-declaration. In the process, fix a couple of bugs that had crept in
where we would parse the first and subsequent member-declarators differently
(in particular, we didn't accept an asm-label on a member function definition
within a class, and we would accept virt-specifiers and attributes in the wrong
order on the first declarator but not on subsequent ones).
llvm-svn: 199957
Due to statement expressions supported as GCC extension, it is possible
to put 'break' or 'continue' into a loop/switch statement but outside
its body, for example:
for ( ; ({ if (first) { first = 0; continue; } 0; }); )
This code is rejected by GCC if compiled in C mode but is accepted in C++
code. GCC bug 44715 tracks this discrepancy. Clang used code generation
that differs from GCC in both modes: only statement of the third
expression of 'for' behaves as if it was inside loop body.
This change makes code generation more close to GCC, considering 'break'
or 'continue' statement in condition and increment expressions of a
loop as it was inside the loop body. It also adds error for the cases
when 'break'/'continue' appear outside loop due to this syntax. If
code generation differ from GCC, warning is issued.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2518
llvm-svn: 199897
a subprocess invocation which is pretty significant on Windows. It also
likely saves a bunch of thrashing the host machine needlessly. Finally
it makes the tests much more predictable and less dependent on the host.
For example 'header_lookup1.c' was passing '-fno-ms-extensions' just to
thwart the host detection adding it into the compilation. By runnig CC1
directly we don't have to deal with such oddities.
llvm-svn: 199308
void knrNoSemi(i) int i { }
Adherents of The C Programming Language unfortunate enough to miss a semicolon
as above would be met with a cascade of errors spanning the remainder of the
TU.
This patch introduces a beautiful parse error recovery, complete with helpful
FixIt to restore sanity.
Before (output redacted for brevity):
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File declarators.c Line 119: declaration does not declare a parameter
File declarators.c Line 123: declaration does not declare a parameter
File declarators.c Line 127: parameter named 'func_E12' is missing
File declarators.c Line 127: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 133: parameter named 'func_E13' is missing
File declarators.c Line 133: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 139: parameter named 'func_E14' is missing
File declarators.c Line 139: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 145: parameter named 'func_E15' is missing
File declarators.c Line 145: expected ';' at end of declaration
File declarators.c Line 150: expected function body after function declarator
File declarators.c Line 119: declaration of 'enum E11' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 123: declaration of 'enum E12' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 133: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 133: declaration of 'enum E13' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 139: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 139: declaration of 'enum E14' will not be visible outside of this function
File declarators.c Line 145: ISO C forbids forward references to 'enum' types
File declarators.c Line 145: declaration of 'enum E15' will not be visible outside of this function
...
After:
declarators.c:103:24: error: expected ';' at end of declaration
void knrNoSemi(i) int i { }
^
;
Patch found in a sealed envelope dated 1978 with the message "Do not open until
January 2014"
llvm-svn: 198540
Previously any error in enum definition body stopped parsing it. With this
change parser tries to recover from errors.
The patch fixes PR10982.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2018
llvm-svn: 198259
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.
(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)
This reverts commit r197295.
llvm-svn: 197299
Previously, a line like
// expected-error-re {{foo}}
treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".
This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.
(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388
llvm-svn: 197092
When parsing invalid top-level asm statements, we were ignoring the
return code of the SkipUntil we used for recovery. This led to crashes
when we hit the end of file and tried to continue parsing anyway.
This fixes the crash and adds a couple of tests for parsing related
problems.
llvm-svn: 196961
We would skip until the next comma, hoping good things whould lie there,
however this would fail when we have such things as this:
struct A {};
template <typename>
struct D;
template <>
struct D<C> : B, A::D;
Once this happens, we would believe that D with a nested namespace
specifier of A was a variable that was being declared. We would go on
to complain that there was an extraneous 'template <>' on their variable
declaration.
Crashes would happen when 'A' gets defined as 'enum class A {}' as
various asserts would fire.
Instead, we should skip up until the semicolon if we see that we are in
the middle of a definition and the current token is a ':'
This fixes PR17084.
llvm-svn: 196453
which specifies couple of (optional) method selectors
for bridging a CFobject to or from an ObjectiveC
object. This is wip. // rdsr://15499111
llvm-svn: 196408
In delayed template parsing mode, adjust the template depth counter for each template parameter list associated with an out of line member template specialization.
llvm-svn: 196351
gcc treats [[gnu:const]], [[gnu::__const]], and [[gnu:__const__]] as all being
equivalent. Add an additional test case to ensure that we do not miss the last
case.
llvm-svn: 195982
and we see an ill-formed declarator that would probably be well-formed if the
tag definition were just missing a semicolon, use that as the diagnostic
instead of producing some other mysterious error.
llvm-svn: 195163
This patch fixes PR8264. Duplicate qualifiers already are diagnozed,
now the same diagnostics is issued for duplicate function specifiers.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2025
llvm-svn: 194559
definition. If we see something that looks like a namespace definition inside a
class, that strongly indicates that a close brace was missing somewhere.
llvm-svn: 194319
into a separate "parse an attribute that takes a type argument" codepath. This
results in both codepaths being a lot cleaner and simpler, and fixes some bugs
where the type argument handling bled into the expression argument handling and
caused us to both accept invalid and reject valid attribute arguments.
llvm-svn: 193731
which we don't think can't have one, only allow it in the tiny number of
attributes which opts into this weird parse rule.
I've manually checked that the handlers for all these attributes can in fact
cope with an identifier as the argument. This is still somewhat terrible; we
should move more fully towards picking the parsing rules based on the
attribute, and make the Parse -> Sema interface more type-safe.
llvm-svn: 193295
Commit r191484 treated constexpr function templates as normal function
templates with respect to delaying their parsing. However, this is
unnecessarily restrictive because there is no compatibility concern with
constexpr, MSVC doesn't support it.
Instead, simply disable delayed template parsing for constexpr function
templates. This largely reverts the changes made in r191484 but keeps
it's unit test.
This fixes PR17661.
llvm-svn: 193274
This patch wasn't reviewed, and isn't correctly preserving the behaviors
relied upon by QT. I don't have a direct example of fallout, but it
should go through the standard code review process. For example, it
should never have removed the QT test case that was added when fixing
those users.
llvm-svn: 193174
This is a fix to PR17649, caused by fix in r193073. QT uses 'break' statement
to implement their 'foreach' macro. To enable build of QT, this fix reenables
break but only in 'for' statement specifier and only in the third expression.
llvm-svn: 193170
Due to statement expressions supported as GCC extension, it is possible
to put 'break' or 'continue' into a loop/switch statement but outside its
body, for example:
for ( ; ({ if (first) { first = 0; continue; } 0; }); )
Such usage must be diagnosed as an error, GCC rejects it. To recognize
this and similar patterns the flags BreakScope and ContinueScope are
temporarily turned off while parsing condition expression.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1762
llvm-svn: 193073
Now that CorrectTypo knows how to correctly search classes for typo
correction candidates, there is no good reason to only replace an
existing CXXScopeSpecifier if it refers to a namespace. While the actual
enablement was a matter of changing a single comparison, the fallout
from enabling the functionality required a lot more code changes
(including my two previous commits).
llvm-svn: 193020
r177003 applied the late parsed template technique to friend functions
but omitted the corresponding check for redefinitions.
This patch adds the same check already in use for templates to the
new code path in order to diagnose and reject invalid redefinitions
that were being silently accepted.
Fixes PR17324.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 192948
that looks like a function declaration, except that it's missing a return type,
try typo-correcting it to the relevant constructor name.
In passing, fix a bug where the missing-type-specifier recovery codepath would
drop a preceding scope specifier on the floor, leading to follow-on diagnostics
and incorrect recovery for the auto-in-c++98 hack.
llvm-svn: 192644
Richard Smith