Summary:
This is an issue both with regular and Thin LTO. When we link together
a DICompileUnit that is marked NoDebug (e.g when compiling with -g0
but applying an AutoFDO profile, which requires location tracking
in the compiler) and a DICompileUnit with debug emission enabled,
we can have failures during dwarf debug generation. Specifically,
when we have inlined from the NoDebug compile unit into the debug
compile unit, we can fail during construction of the abstract and
inlined scope DIEs. This is because the SPMap does not include NoDebug
CUs (they are skipped in the debug_compile_units_iterator).
This patch fixes the failures by skipping locations from NoDebug CUs
when extracting lexical scopes.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29765
llvm-svn: 295384
We had various variants of defining dump() functions in LLVM. Normalize
them (this should just consistently implement the things discussed in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-January/034323.html
For reference:
- Public headers should just declare the dump() method but not use
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD or #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
- The definition of a dump method should look like this:
#if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void MyClass::dump() {
// print stuff to dbgs()...
}
#endif
llvm-svn: 293359
Before this fix, DILexicalBlockFile entries were skipped only in some cases and were not in other cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18724
llvm-svn: 267004
Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.
Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one. It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs. YMMV of
course.
Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py. I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three. It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).
Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.
llvm-svn: 236120
Gut the `DIDescriptor` wrappers around `MDLocalScope` subclasses. Note
that `DILexicalBlock` wraps `MDLexicalBlockBase`, not `MDLexicalBlock`.
llvm-svn: 234850
Two things here:
1. I read `getScope()` and `getContext()` backwards in r233640. There
was no need for `getScopeOfScope()`. Obviously not enough test
coverage here (as I said in that commit, I'm going to come back to
that), but anyway I'm reverting to the behaviour before r233640.
2. The callers that use `DILexicalBlockFile::getContext()` don't seem
to care about the difference. Just have it redirect to `getScope()`
so I can't get confused again.
llvm-svn: 233650
The only user of `DebugLoc::getFromDILexicalBlock()` was creating a new
`MDLocation` as convenient API for passing an `MDScope`. Stop doing
that, and remove the API. If in the future we actually *want* to create
new DebugLocs, calling `MDLexicalBlock::get()` makes more sense.
llvm-svn: 233643
Pervasively use the types provided by the debug info hierarchy rather
than `MDNode` in `LexicalScopes`.
I noticed (again, I guess, based on comments in the implementation?)
that `DILexicalBlockFile::getScope()` returns something different from
`DILexicalBlockFile::getContext()`. I created a local helper for
getting the same logic from `MDLexicalBlockFile` called
`getScopeOfScope()`. I still don't really understand it, but I've added
some FIXMEs and I'll come back to it (I suspect the way we encode these
objects isn't really ideal).
Note that my previous commit r233610 accidentally changed behaviour in
`findLexicalScope()` -- it transitioned from a call to
`DILexicalBlockFile::getScope()` to `MDLexicalBlockFile::getScope()`
(sounds right, doesn't it?) -- so I've fixed that as a drive-by. No
tests failed with my error, so it looks like we're missing some coverage
here... when I come back to understand the logic, I'll see if I can add
some.
Other than the fix to `findLexicalScope()`, no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 233640
There's no benefit to using `DebugLoc` here. Moreover, this will let a
follow-up commit work with `MDScope` directly instead of `DebugLoc`.
llvm-svn: 233610
While looking at a heap profile of a clang LTO bootstrap with -g, I
noticed that 2.2% of memory in an `llvm-lto` of clang is from calling
`DebugLoc::get()` in `collectVariableInfo()` (accounting for ~40% of
memory used for `MDLocation`s).
I suspect this was introduced by r226736, whose goal was to prevent
uniquing of `DebugLoc`s (goal achieved, if so).
There's no reason we need a `DebugLoc` here at all -- it was just being
used for (in)convenient API -- so the fix is to pass the scope and
inlined-at directly to `LexicalScopes::findInlinedScope()`.
llvm-svn: 229459
Let me tell you a tale...
Originally committed in r211723 after discovering a nasty case of weird
scoping due to inlining, this was reverted in r211724 after it fired in
ASan/compiler-rt.
(minor diversion where I accidentally committed/reverted again in
r211871/r211873)
After further testing and fixing bugs in ArgumentPromotion (r211872) and
Inlining (r212065) it was recommitted in r212085. Reverted in r212089
after the sanitizer buildbots still showed problems.
Fixed another bug in ArgumentPromotion (r212128) found by this
assertion.
Recommitted in r212205, reverted in r212226 after it crashed some more
on sanitizer buildbots.
Fix clang some more in r212761.
Recommitted in r212776, reverted in r212793. ASan failures.
Recommitted in r213391, reverted in r213432, trying to reproduce flakey
ASan build failure.
Fixed bugs in r213805 (ArgPromo + DebugInfo), r213952
(LiveDebugVariables strips dbg_value intrinsics in functions not
described by debug info).
Recommitted in r214761, reverted in r214999, flakey failure on Windows
buildbot.
Fixed DeadArgElimination + DebugInfo bug in r219210.
Recommitted in r219215, reverted in r219512, failure on ObjC++ atomic
properties in the test-suite on Darwin.
Fixed ObjC++ atomic properties issue in Clang in r219690.
[This commit is provided 'as is' with no hope that this is the last time
I commit this change either expressed or implied]
llvm-svn: 219702
This invariant is violated (& the assertions fire) on some Objective C++
in the test-suite. Reverting while I investigate.
This reverts commit r219215.
llvm-svn: 219523
Let me tell you a tale...
Originally committed in r211723 after discovering a nasty case of weird
scoping due to inlining, this was reverted in r211724 after it fired in
ASan/compiler-rt.
(minor diversion where I accidentally committed/reverted again in
r211871/r211873)
After further testing and fixing bugs in ArgumentPromotion (r211872) and
Inlining (r212065) it was recommitted in r212085. Reverted in r212089
after the sanitizer buildbots still showed problems.
Fixed another bug in ArgumentPromotion (r212128) found by this
assertion.
Recommitted in r212205, reverted in r212226 after it crashed some more
on sanitizer buildbots.
Fix clang some more in r212761.
Recommitted in r212776, reverted in r212793. ASan failures.
Recommitted in r213391, reverted in r213432, trying to reproduce flakey
ASan build failure.
Fixed bugs in r213805 (ArgPromo + DebugInfo), r213952
(LiveDebugVariables strips dbg_value intrinsics in functions not
described by debug info).
Recommitted in r214761, reverted in r214999, flakey failure on Windows
buildbot.
Fixed DeadArgElimination + DebugInfo bug in r219210.
Recommitting and hoping that's the last of it.
[That one burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp.]
llvm-svn: 219215
Originally reverted in r213432 with flakey failures on an ASan self-host
build. After reduction it seems to be the same issue fixed in r213805
(ArgPromo + DebugInfo: Handle updating debug info over multiple
applications of argument promotion) and r213952 (by having
LiveDebugVariables strip dbg_value intrinsics in functions that are not
described by debug info). Though I cannot explain why this failure was
flakey...
llvm-svn: 214761
Recommits 212776 which was reverted in r212793. This has been committed
and recommitted a few times as I try to test it harder and find/fix more
issues. The most recent revert was due to an asan bot failure which I
can't seem to reproduce locally, though I believe I'm following all the
steps the buildbot does.
So I'm going to recommit this in the hopes of investigating the failure
on the buildbot itself... apologies in advance for the bot noise. If
anyone sees failures with this /please/ provide me with any
reproductions, etc.
llvm-svn: 213391
This reverts commit r212776.
Nope, still seems to be failing on the sanitizer bots... but hey, not
the msan self-host anymore, it's failing in asan now. I'll start looking
there next.
llvm-svn: 212793
Committed in r212205 and reverted in r212226 due to msan self-hosting
failure, I believe I've got that fixed by r212761 to Clang.
Original commit message:
"Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
committed again in r212085 and reverted again in r212089 after fixing
some other cases, such as debug info subprogram lists not keeping track
of the function they represent (r212128) and then short-circuiting
things like LiveDebugVariables that build LexicalScopes for functions
that might not have full debug info.
And again, I believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined
instructions."
llvm-svn: 212776
This reverts commit r212205.
Reverting this again, still seeing crashes when building compiler-rt...
Sorry for the continued noise, not sure why I'm failing to reproduce
this locally.
llvm-svn: 212226
Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
committed again in r212085 and reverted again in r212089 after fixing
some other cases, such as debug info subprogram lists not keeping track
of the function they represent (r212128) and then short-circuiting
things like LiveDebugVariables that build LexicalScopes for functions
that might not have full debug info.
And again, I believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 212205
This reverts commit r212085.
This breaks the sanitizer bot... & I thought I'd tried pretty hard not
to do that. Guess I need to try harder.
llvm-svn: 212089
Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
and I now believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 212085
Reverting this again, didn't mean to commit it - while r211872 fixes one
of the issues here, there are still others to figure out and address.
This reverts commit r211871.
llvm-svn: 211873
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 211723
Seems my previous fix was insufficient - we were still not adding the
inlined function to the abstract scope list. Which meant it wasn't
flagged as inline, didn't have nested lexical scopes in the abstract
definition, and didn't have abstract variables - so the inlined variable
didn't reference an abstract variable, instead being described
completely inline.
llvm-svn: 209602
This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes
within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost.
The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was
previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for
"DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current
file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the
inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By
inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct
behavior is attained.
(also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test
case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but
I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does
reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix)
llvm-svn: 208748
(r207876 was reverted in r208131 after seeing some consistent buildbot
failure for MSVC 2012. The original commits were in r207724-r207726)
Takumi was nice enough to dig into this and locate this Microsoft
Connect issue:
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/814899/forward-as-tuple-debug-implementation-error
describing a bug in MSVC2012's forward_as_tuple implementation.
Since the parameters in this instance are trivial/small, pass them by
value (using make_tuple) instead of perfectly-forwarded tuple of rvalue
references (involving the broken forward_as_tuple). Hopefully this will
satisfy MSVC2012.
llvm-svn: 208364
Speculatively reverting due to a suspicious failure on a Windows
buildbot.
This reverts commit 10c37a012ea11596d44cd9059fe09c959caf30c8.
llvm-svn: 208131
Committed initially in r207724-r207726 and reverted due to compiler-rt
crashes in r207732.
Instead, fix this harder with unordered_map and store the LexicalScopes
by value in the map. This did necessitate moving the definition of
LexicalScope above the definition of LexicalScopes.
Let's see how the buildbots/compilers tolerate unordered_map::emplace +
std::piecewise_construct + std::forward_as_tuple...
llvm-svn: 207876
Eugene Zelenko