This test behavior differs depending (at least) on whether
sizeof(wchar_t) == sizeof(int) or not.
When they are equal, the first redeclaration will fail because decltype(+L'x')
is unsigned int instead of the expected int. This occurs on ARM.
llvm-svn: 164315
While it might be nice to have a quick end-to-end sanity test, it's just not
really the right place for it & would require more work to enable lit to
provide a detection flag ("XFAIL: cross" or similar) than the value we get from
having this test. Early on it might've made more sense, but these days we've
got some pretty good coverage across the stack with more targeted tests.
llvm-svn: 164314
This is some really old code (took me a while to find the test cases) & the
diagnostic text is slightly incorrect (it should really only apply to
re/declarations/, redefinitions are an error regardless of whether the types
match). Not sure if anyone cares about it, though.
For now this just makes the diagnostic more clear in less obvious cases where
the type of a declaration might not be explicitly written (eg: because it
uses decltype)
llvm-svn: 164313
We can now read the relevant data structures for
the method list, and use a callback mechanism to
report their details to the AppleObjCTypeVendor,
which constructs appropriate Clang types.
llvm-svn: 164310
- Inputs/system-header-simulator.h: Declare strlen() with size_t.
- malloc-interprocedural.c: Move the definition of size_t into the header above.
Then XFAIL can be pruned.
llvm-svn: 164300
By changing the conversion operator into a conversion constructor, we
can enabled based on the template parameters leading to better error
messages. E.g.: stmt(decl()) will now create an error message including:
note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from
'clang::ast_matchers::internal::BindableMatcher<clang::Decl>' to 'const
clang::ast_matchers::internal::Matcher<clang::Stmt>' for 1st argument
llvm-svn: 164298
- Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the
following issue:
* Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop
previously the spin-loop looks like
thisMBB:
newMBB:
ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr]
op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val]
not t3 = t2 (if Invert)
mov EAX = t1
lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit]
bz newMBB
fallthrough -->nextMBB
the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop
as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into
EAX. This loop is refined as:
thisMBB:
EAX = LOAD [MI.addr]
mainMBB:
t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX
LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined]
JNE mainMBB
sinkMBB:
* Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has
all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand.
* Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction
td
* Fix issues in PR13458
- Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types.
NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality.
- Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated.
llvm-svn: 164281
If someone provides their own function called 'strdup', or 'reallocf', or
even 'malloc', and we inlined it, the inlining should have given us all the
malloc-related information we need. If we then try to attach new information
to the return value, we could end up with spurious warnings.
<rdar://problem/12317671>
llvm-svn: 164276
While we definitely want this optimization in the future, we're not
currently handling constraints on symbolic /expressions/ correctly.
These should stay live even if the SymExpr itself is no longer referenced
because could recreate an identical SymExpr later. Only once the SymExpr
can no longer be recreated -- i.e. a component symbol is dead -- can we
safely remove the constraints on it.
This liveness issue is tracked by <rdar://problem/12333297>.
This reverts r163444 / 24c7f98828e039005cff3bd847e7ab404a6a09f8.
llvm-svn: 164275
Greg Clayton