Sigh, another follow-on fix needed for test in r299152 causing bot
failures. We also need the target-cpu for the ThinLTO BE clang
invocation.
llvm-svn: 299178
Third and hopefully final fix to test for r299152 that is causing bot
failures: make sure the target triple specified for the ThinLTO backend
clang invocations as well.
llvm-svn: 299176
AddressSanitizer has an optional compile-time flag, -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope, which enables detection of use-after-scope bugs. We'd like to have this feature on by default, because it is already very well tested, it's used in several projects already (LLVM automatically enables it when using -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address), it's low overhead and there are no known issues or incompatibilities.
This patch enables use-after-scope by default via the Clang driver, where we set true as the default value for AsanUseAfterScope. This also causes the lifetime markers to be generated whenever fsanitize=address is used. This has some nice consequences, e.g. we now have line numbers for all local variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31479
llvm-svn: 299174
Summary:
This involved refactoring out pieces of
EmitAssemblyHelper::CreateTargetMachine for use in runThinLTOBackend.
Subsumes D31114.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, pcc
Subscribers: Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31508
llvm-svn: 299152
Summary:
The refactoring introduced a regression in the flag processing for
-fxray-instruction-threshold which causes it to not get passed properly.
This change should restore the previous behaviour.
Reviewers: rnk, pelikan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31491
llvm-svn: 299126
GCC has the alloc_align attribute, which is similar to assume_aligned, except the attribute's parameter is the index of the integer parameter that needs aligning to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29599
llvm-svn: 299117
an ObjC object pointer
When ARC is enabled in Objective-C++, comparisons between a pointer and
Objective-C object pointer typically result in errors like this:
"invalid operands to a binary expression". This error message can be quite
confusing as it doesn't provide a solution to the problem, unlike the non-C++
diagnostic: "implicit conversion of Objective-C pointer type 'id' to C pointer
type 'void *' requires a bridged cast" (it also provides fix-its). This commit
forces comparisons between pointers and Objective-C object pointers in ARC to
use the Objective-C semantic rules to ensure that a better diagnostic is
reported.
rdar://31103857
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31177
llvm-svn: 299080
Summary:
The -fxray-always-instrument= and -fxray-never-instrument= flags take
filenames that are used to imbue the XRay instrumentation attributes
using a whitelist mechanism (similar to the sanitizer special cases
list). We use the same syntax and semantics as the sanitizer blacklists
files in the implementation.
As implemented, we respect the attributes that are already defined in
the source file (i.e. those that have the
[[clang::xray_{always,never}_instrument]] attributes) before applying
the always/never instrument lists.
Reviewers: rsmith, chandlerc
Subscribers: jfb, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30388
llvm-svn: 299041
FPContractModeKind is the codegen option flag which is already ternary (off,
on, fast). This makes it universally the type for the contractable info
across the front-end:
* In FPOptions (i.e. in the Sema + in the expression nodes).
* In LangOpts::DefaultFPContractMode which is the option that initializes
FPOptions in the Sema.
Another way to look at this change is that before fp-contractable on/off were
the only states handled to the front-end:
* For "on", FMA folding was performed by the front-end
* For "fast", we simply forwarded the flag to TargetOptions to handle it in
LLVM
Now off/on/fast are all exposed because for fast we will generate
fast-math-flags during CodeGen.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
---
This is a recommit of r299027 with an adjustment to the test
CodeGenCUDA/fp-contract.cu. The test assumed that even
though -ffp-contract=on is passed FE-based folding of FMA won't happen.
This is obviously wrong since the user is asking for this explicitly with the
option. CUDA is different that -ffp-contract=fast is on by default.
The test used to "work" because contract=fast and contract=on were maintained
separately and we didn't fold in the FE because contract=fast was on due to
the target-default. This patch consolidates the contract=on/fast/off state
into a ternary state hence the change in behavior.
---
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31167
llvm-svn: 299033
Summary: After examining the remaining uses of LangOptions.ObjCAutoRefCount, found a some additional places to also check for ObjCWeak not covered by previous test cases. Added a test file to verify all the code paths that were changed.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31007
llvm-svn: 299015
Summary: clang should produce the same errors Objective-C classes that cannot be assigned to weak pointers under both -fobjc-arc and -fobjc-weak. Check for ObjCWeak along with ObjCAutoRefCount when analyzing pointer conversions. Add an -fobjc-weak pass to the existing arc-unavailable-for-weakref test cases to verify the behavior is the same.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31006
llvm-svn: 299014
Summary: -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak should produce the same warnings with -fobjc-weak as it does with -objc-arc. Also check for ObjCWeak along with ObjCAutoRefCount when recording the use of an evaluated weak variable. Add a -fobjc-weak run to the existing arc-repeated-weak test case and adapt it slightly to work in both modes.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, jordan_rose, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: arphaman, rjmccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31005
llvm-svn: 299011
Summary: Similar to ARC, in ObjCWeak Objective-C object pointers qualified with a weak lifetime are not POD or trivial types. Update the type trait code to reflect this. Copy and adapt the arc-type-traits.mm test case to verify correctness.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31004
llvm-svn: 299010
Summary:
When a PCH is included via -include-pch, clang should treat the
current TU as dependent on the sourcefile that the PCH was generated from.
This is currently _partly_ accomplished by InitializePreprocessor calling
AddImplicitIncludePCH to synthesize an implicit #include of the sourcefile,
into the preprocessor's Predefines buffer.
For FrontendActions such as PreprocessOnlyAction (which is, curiously, what the
driver winds up running one of in response to a plain clang -M) this is
sufficient: the preprocessor cranks over its Predefines and emits a dependency
reference to the initial sourcefile.
For other FrontendActions (for example -emit-obj or -fsyntax-only) the
Predefines buffer is reset to the suggested predefines buffer from the PCH, so
the dependency edge is lost. The result is that clang emits a .d file in those
cases that lacks a reference to the .h file responsible for the input (and in
Swift's case, our .swiftdeps file winds up not including a reference to the
source file for a PCH bridging header.)
This patch fixes the problem by taking a different tack: ignoring the
Predefines buffer (which seems a bit like a hack anyways) and directly
attaching the CompilerInstance's DependencyCollectors (and legacy
DependencyFileGenerator) to the ASTReader for the external AST.
This approach is similar to the one chosen in earlier consultation with Bruno
and Ben, and I think it's the least-bad solution, given several options.
Reviewers: bruno, benlangmuir, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: bruno, doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31378
llvm-svn: 299009
Summary: When adding an Objective-C retainable type member to a C++ class, also check the LangOpts.ObjCWeak flag and the lifetime qualifier so __weak qualified Objective-C pointer members cause the class to be a non-POD type with non-trivial special members, so the compiler always emits the necessary runtime calls for copying, moving, and destroying the weak member. Otherwise, Objective-C++ classes with weak Objective-C pointer members compiled with -fobjc-weak exhibit undefined behavior if the C++ class is classified as a POD type.
Reviewers: rsmith, benlangmuir, doug.gregor, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31003
llvm-svn: 299008
If the value is known, but we cannot increment it, conjure a symbol to
represent the result of the operation based on the operator expression,
not on the sub-expression.
In particular, no longer crash on comparing a result of a LocAsInteger increment
to a constant integer.
rdar://problem/31067356
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31289
llvm-svn: 298927
Adjustments should be considered properly; we should copy the unadjusted object
over the whole temporary base region. If the unadjusted object is no longer
available in the Environment, invalidate the temporary base region, and then
copy the adjusted object into the adjusted sub-region of the temporary region.
This fixes a regression introduced by r288263, that caused various
false positives, due to copying only adjusted object into the adjusted region;
the rest of the base region therefore remained undefined.
Before r288263, the adjusted value was copied over the unadjusted region,
which is incorrect, but accidentally worked better due to how region store
disregards compound value bindings to non-base regions.
An additional test machinery is introduced to make sure that despite making
two binds, we only notify checkers once for both of them, without exposing
the partially copied objects.
This fix is a hack over a hack. The proper fix would be to model C++ temporaries
in the CFG, and after that dealing with adjustments would no longer be
necessary, and the values we need would no longer disappear from the
Environment.
rdar://problem/30658168
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30534
llvm-svn: 298924
If there is an unresolved member access AST node, and the base is
implicit, do not access/use it for generating candidate overloads for
code completion results.
Fixes PR31093.
llvm-svn: 298903
Summary:
If promise_type has get_return_object_on_allocation_failure defined,
check if an allocation function returns nullptr, and if so,
return the result of get_return_object_on_allocation_failure().
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31399
llvm-svn: 298891
Summary:
This patch implements parsing of [[clang::suppress(rule, ...)]]
and [[gsl::suppress(rule, ...)]] attributes.
C++ Core Guidelines depend heavily on tool support for
rule enforcement. They also propose a way to suppress
warnings [1] which is by annotating any ancestor in AST
with the C++11 attribute [[gsl::suppress(rule1,...)]].
To have a mechanism to suppress non-C++ Core
Guidelines specific, an additional spelling of [[clang::suppress]]
is defined.
For example, to suppress the warning cppcoreguidelines-slicing,
one could do
```
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]]
void f() { ... code that does slicing ... }
```
or
```
void g() {
Derived b;
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]]
Base a{b};
[[clang::suppress("cppcoreguidelines-slicing")]] {
doSomething();
Base a2{b};
}
}
```
This parsing can then be used by clang-tidy, which includes multiple
C++ Core Guidelines rules, to suppress warnings (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24888).
For the exact naming of the rule in the attribute, there
are different possibilities, which will be defined in the
corresponding clang-tidy patch.
Currently, clang-tidy supports suppressing of warnings through "//
NOLINT" comments. There are some advantages that the attribute has:
- Suppressing specific warnings instead of all warnings
- Suppressing warnings in a block (namespace, function, compound
statement)
- Code formatting may split a statement into multiple lines,
thus a "// NOLINT" comment may be on the wrong line
I'm looking forward to your comments!
[1] https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#inforce-enforcement
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24886
llvm-svn: 298880
for unused values.
This fixes a regression caused by r298676, where constructor calls to
classes with non-trivial dtor were marked as unused if the first
argument is an initializer list. This is inconsistent (as the test
shows) and also warns on a reasonbly common code pattern where people
just call constructors to create and immediately destroy an object.
llvm-svn: 298853
Details:
Emit suspend expression which roughly looks like:
auto && x = CommonExpr();
if (!x.await_ready()) {
llvm_coro_save();
x.await_suspend(...); (*)
llvm_coro_suspend(); (**)
}
x.await_resume();
where the result of the entire expression is the result of x.await_resume()
(*) If x.await_suspend return type is bool, it allows to veto a suspend:
if (x.await_suspend(...))
llvm_coro_suspend();
(**) llvm_coro_suspend() encodes three possible continuations as a switch instruction:
%where-to = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(...)
switch i8 %where-to, label %coro.ret [ ; jump to epilogue to suspend
i8 0, label %yield.ready ; go here when resumed
i8 1, label %yield.cleanup ; go here when destroyed
]
llvm-svn: 298784
For target environment amdgiz and amdgizcl (giz means Generic Is Zero), AMDGPU will use new address space mapping where generic address space is 0 and private address space is 5. The data layout is also changed correspondingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31210
llvm-svn: 298767
This typically is only for a new enough linker (bfd >= 2.16.2 or gold), but
our ppc suppport post-dates this and it should work on all linux platforms. It
is guaranteed to work on all elfv2 platforms.
llvm-svn: 298765
The checker currently warns on copying, moving, or calling methods on an object
that was recently std::move'd from. It understands a set of "state reset"
methods that bring a moved-from object back to a well-specified state.
Patch by Peter Szecsi!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24246
llvm-svn: 298698
attributes.
These patches don't work because we can't currently access the parameter
information in a reliable way when building attributes. I thought this
would be relatively straightforward to fix, but it seems not to be the
case. Fixing this will requrie a substantial re-plumbing of machinery to
allow attributes to be handled in this location, and several other fixes
to the attribute machinery should probably be made at the same time. All
of this will make the patch .... substantially more complicated.
Reverting for now as there are active miscompiles caused by the current
version.
llvm-svn: 298695
Teresa Johnson