I do not fully understand why we had these values in the tests, but
the new value matches what ld.bfd and ld.gold set, so I guess that
was just a mistake.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30441
llvm-svn: 296505
On MIPS .got section cannot be included into the PT_GNU_RELRO segment.
Sometimes it might work, but in general it is unsupported. One of the
problem is that all sections marked by SHF_MIPS_GPREL should be grouped
together because data in these sections is addressable with a gp
relative address, but such sections might be writable.
This patch exclude mips .got from PT_GNU_RELRO segment and group
SHF_MIPS_GPREL sections.
llvm-svn: 292161
This is in preparation for my next change, which will introduce a relro
nobits section. That requires that relro sections appear at the end of the
progbits part of the r/w segment so that the relro nobits section can appear
contiguously.
Because of the amount of churn required in the test suite, I'm making this
change separately.
llvm-svn: 291523
This patch allows static linking of TLS code. To do that it fixes
GOT entries initialization.
If TLS-related GOT entry created for a preemptible symbol i.e. has
a corresponding dynamic relocation, leave the entry initialized by zero.
Write down adjusted TLS symbol's values otherwise. For the adjustments
calculation use offsets for thread-local storage.
https://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/NPTL
llvm-svn: 280914
The patch adds one more partition to the MIPS GOT. This time it is for
TLS related GOT entries. Such entries are located after 'local' and 'global'
ones. We cannot get a final offset for these entries at the time of
creation because we do not know size of 'local' and 'global' partitions.
So we have to adjust the offset later using `getMipsTlsOffset()` method.
All MIPS TLS relocations which need GOT entries operates MIPS style GOT
offset - 'offset from the GOT's beginning' - MipsGPOffset constant. That
is why I add new types of relocation expressions.
One more difference from othe ABIs is that the MIPS ABI does not support
any TLS relocation relaxations. I decided to make a separate function
`handleMipsTlsRelocation` and put MIPS TLS relocation handling code
there. It is similar to `handleTlsRelocation` routine and duplicates its
code. But it allows to make the code cleaner and prevent pollution of
the `handleTlsRelocation` by MIPS 'if' statements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21606
llvm-svn: 273569
Rui Ueyama