Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song 5d44c92bf8 Change void getNoop(MCInst &NopInst) to MCInst getNop()
Prefer (self-documenting) return values to output parameters (which are
liable to be used).
While here, rename Noop to Nop which is more widely used and improves
consistency with hasEmitNops/setEmitNops/emitNop/etc.
2021-03-15 12:05:34 -07:00
Sriraman Tallam c32f399802 Detect Source Drift with Propeller.
Source Drift happens when the sources are updated after profiling the binary
but before building the final optimized binary. If the source has changed since
the profiles were obtained, optimizing basic blocks might be sub-optimal. This
only applies to BasicBlockSection::List as it creates clusters of basic blocks
using basic block ids. Source drift can invalidate these groupings leading to
sub-optimal code generation with regards to performance.

PGO source drift for a particular function can be detected using function
metadata added in D95495.

When source drift is deected, disable basic block clusters by default
which can be re-enabled with  -mllvm option
bbsections-detect-source-drift=false.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95593
2021-01-29 18:47:26 -08:00
Snehasish Kumar 77638a5343 [llvm] Set the default for -bbsections-cold-text-prefix to .text.split.
After using this for a while, we find that it is generally useful to
have it set to .text.split. by default, removing the need for an
additional -mllvm option.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88997
2020-10-14 12:16:36 -07:00
Rahman Lavaee 2b0c5d76a6 Introduce and use a new section type for the bb_addr_map section.
This patch lets the bb_addr_map (renamed to __llvm_bb_addr_map) section use a special section type (SHT_LLVM_BB_ADDR_MAP) instead of SHT_PROGBITS. This would help parsers, dumpers and other tools to use the sh_type ELF field to identify this section rather than relying on string comparison on the section name.

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88199
2020-10-08 11:13:19 -07:00
Rahman Lavaee 8955950c12 Exception support for basic block sections
This is part of the Propeller framework to do post link code layout optimizations. Please see the RFC here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/llvm-dev/ef3mKzAdJ7U/1shV64BYBAAJ and the detailed RFC doc here: https://github.com/google/llvm-propeller/blob/plo-dev/Propeller_RFC.pdf

This patch provides exception support for basic block sections by splitting the call-site table into call-site ranges corresponding to different basic block sections. Still all landing pads must reside in the same basic block section (which is guaranteed by the the core basic block section patch D73674 (ExceptionSection) ). Each call-site table will refer to the landing pad fragment by explicitly specifying @LPstart (which is omitted in the normal non-basic-block section case). All these call-site tables will share their action and type tables.

The C++ ABI somehow assumes that no landing pads point directly to LPStart (which works in the normal case since the function begin is never a landing pad), and uses LP.offset = 0 to specify no landing pad. In the case of basic block section where one section contains all the landing pads, the landing pad offset relative to LPStart could actually be zero. Thus, we avoid zero-offset landing pads by inserting a **nop** operation as the first non-CFI instruction in the exception section.

**Background on Exception Handling in C++ ABI**
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/blob/master/exceptions.pdf

Compiler emits an exception table for every function. When an exception is thrown, the stack unwinding library queries the unwind table (which includes the start and end of each function) to locate the exception table for that function.

The exception table includes a call site table for the function, which is used to guide the exception handling runtime to take the appropriate action upon an exception. Each call site record in this table is structured as follows:

| CallSite                       |  -->  Position of the call site (relative to the function entry)
| CallSite length           |  -->  Length of the call site.
| Landing Pad               |  -->  Position of the landing pad (relative to the landing pad fragment’s begin label)
| Action record offset  |  -->  Position of the first action record

The call site records partition a function into different pieces and describe what action must be taken for each callsite. The callsite fields are relative to the start of the function (as captured in the unwind table).

The landing pad entry is a reference into the function and corresponds roughly to the catch block of a try/catch statement. When execution resumes at a landing pad, it receives an exception structure and a selector value corresponding to the type of the exception thrown, and executes similar to a switch-case statement. The landing pad field is relative to the beginning of the procedure fragment which includes all the landing pads (@LPStart). The C++ ABI requires all landing pads to be in the same fragment. Nonetheless, without basic block sections, @LPStart is the same as the function @Start (found in the unwind table) and can be omitted.

The action record offset is an index into the action table which includes information about which exception types are caught.

**C++ Exceptions with Basic Block Sections**
Basic block sections break the contiguity of a function fragment. Therefore, call sites must be specified relative to the beginning of the basic block section. Furthermore, the unwinding library should be able to find the corresponding callsites for each section. To do so, the .cfi_lsda directive for a section must point to the range of call-sites for that section.
This patch introduces a new **CallSiteRange** structure which specifies the range of call-sites which correspond to every section:

  `struct CallSiteRange {
    // Symbol marking the beginning of the precedure fragment.
    MCSymbol *FragmentBeginLabel = nullptr;
    // Symbol marking the end of the procedure fragment.
    MCSymbol *FragmentEndLabel = nullptr;
    // LSDA symbol for this call-site range.
    MCSymbol *ExceptionLabel = nullptr;
    // Index of the first call-site entry in the call-site table which
    // belongs to this range.
    size_t CallSiteBeginIdx = 0;
    // Index just after the last call-site entry in the call-site table which
    // belongs to this range.
    size_t CallSiteEndIdx = 0;
    // Whether this is the call-site range containing all the landing pads.
    bool IsLPRange = false;
  };`

With N basic-block-sections, the call-site table is partitioned into N call-site ranges.

Conceptually, we emit the call-site ranges for sections sequentially in the exception table as if each section has its own exception table. In the example below, two sections result in the two call site ranges (denoted by LSDA1 and LSDA2) placed next to each other. However, their call-sites will refer to records in the shared Action Table. We also emit the header fields (@LPStart and CallSite Table Length) for each call site range in order to place the call site ranges in separate LSDAs. We note that with -basic-block-sections, The CallSiteTableLength will not actually represent the length of the call site table, but rather the reference to the action table. Since the only purpose of this field is to locate the action table, correctness is guaranteed.

Finally, every call site range has one @LPStart pointer so the landing pads of each section must all reside in one section (not necessarily the same section). To make this easier, we decide to place all landing pads of the function in one section (hence the `IsLPRange` field in CallSiteRange).

|  @LPStart                   |  --->  Landing pad fragment     ( LSDA1 points here)
| CallSite Table Length | ---> Used to find the action table.
| CallSites                     |
| …                                 |
| …                                 |
| @LPStart                    |  --->  Landing pad fragment ( LSDA2 points here)
| CallSite Table Length |
| CallSites                     |
| …                                 |
| …                                 |
…
…
|      Action Table          |
|      Types Table           |

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73739
2020-09-30 11:05:55 -07:00
Snehasish Kumar d2696dec45 [llvm] Add -bbsections-cold-text-prefix to emit cold clusters to a different section.
This change adds an option to basic block sections to allow cold
clusters to be assigned a custom text prefix. With a custom prefix such
as ".text.split." (D87840), lld can place them in a separate output section.
The benefits are -

* Empirically shown to improve icache and itlb metrics by 3-5%
(absolute) compared to placing split parts in .text.unlikely.
* Mitigates against poor profiles, eg samplePGO profiles used with the
machine function splitter. Optimizations such as hugepage remapping can
make different decisions at the section granularity.
* Enables section granularity hotness monitoring (checking on the
decisions made during compilation vs sample data from production).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87813
2020-09-24 15:26:15 -07:00
Rahman Lavaee 7841e21c98 Let -basic-block-sections=labels emit basicblock metadata in a new .bb_addr_map section, instead of emitting special unary-encoded symbols.
This patch introduces the new .bb_addr_map section feature which allows us to emit the bits needed for mapping binary profiles to basic blocks into a separate section.
The format of the emitted data is represented as follows. It includes a header for every function:

|  Address of the function                      |  -> 8 bytes (pointer size)
|  Number of basic blocks in this function (>0) |  -> ULEB128

The header is followed by a BB record for every basic block. These records are ordered in the same order as MachineBasicBlocks are placed in the function. Each BB Info is structured as follows:

|  Offset of the basic block relative to function begin |  -> ULEB128
|  Binary size of the basic block                       |  -> ULEB128
|  BB metadata                                          |  -> ULEB128  [ MBB.isReturn() OR MBB.hasTailCall() << 1  OR  MBB.isEHPad() << 2 ]

The new feature will replace the existing "BB labels" functionality with -basic-block-sections=labels.
The .bb_addr_map section scrubs the specially-encoded BB symbols from the binary and makes it friendly to profilers and debuggers.
Furthermore, the new feature reduces the binary size overhead from 70% bloat to only 12%.

For more information and results please refer to the RFC: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143512.html

Reviewed By: MaskRay, snehasish

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85408
2020-09-14 10:16:44 -07:00
Snehasish Kumar 94faadaca4 [llvm][CodeGen] Machine Function Splitter
We introduce a codegen optimization pass which splits functions into hot and cold
parts. This pass leverages the basic block sections feature recently
introduced in LLVM from the Propeller project. The pass targets
functions with profile coverage, identifies cold blocks and moves them
to a separate section. The linker groups all cold blocks across
functions together, decreasing fragmentation and improving icache and
itlb utilization.

We evaluated the Machine Function Splitter pass on clang bootstrap and
SPECInt 2017.

For clang bootstrap we observe a mean 2.33% runtime improvement with a
~32% reduction in itlb and stlb misses. Additionally, L1 icache misses
reduced by 9.5% while L2 instruction misses reduced by 20%.

For SPECInt we report the change in IntRate the C/C++
benchmarks. All benchmarks apart from mcf and x264 improve, on average
by 0.6% with the max for deepsjeng at 1.6%.

Benchmark		% Change
500.perlbench_r		 0.78
502.gcc_r		 0.82
505.mcf_r		-0.30
520.omnetpp_r		 0.18
523.xalancbmk_r		 0.37
525.x264_r		-0.46
531.deepsjeng_r		 1.61
541.leela_r		 0.83
557.xz_r		 0.15

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85368
2020-08-28 11:10:14 -07:00
Snehasish Kumar 8d943a928d [NFC] Rename BBSectionsPrepare -> BasicBlockSections.
Rename the BBSectionsPrepare pass as suggested by the review comment in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D85368.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85380
2020-08-06 13:12:06 -07:00