Breaking a string literal or a function calls arguments with
AlignConsecutiveDeclarations or AlignConsecutiveAssignments did misalign
the continued line. E.g.:
void foo() {
int myVar = 5;
double x = 3.14;
auto str = "Hello"
"World";
}
or
void foo() {
int myVar = 5;
double x = 3.14;
auto str = "Hello"
"World";
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98214
This is a bug fix of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49175
The expected code format:
unsigned int* a;
int* b;
unsigned int Const* c;
The actual code after formatting (without this patch):
unsigned int* a;
int* b;
unsigned int Const* c;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97137
Currently, empty lines and comments break alignment of assignments on consecutive
lines. This makes the AlignConsecutiveAssignments option an enum that allows controlling
whether empty lines or empty lines and comments should be ignored when aligning
assignments.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, tinloaf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93986
Currently, empty lines and comments break alignment of assignments on consecutive
lines. This makes the AlignConsecutiveAssignments option an enum that allows controlling
whether empty lines or empty lines and comments should be ignored when aligning
assignments.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, tinloaf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93986
This allows to ignore for example Qts emit when
AlignConsecutiveDeclarations is set, otherwise it is parsed as a type
and it results in some misformating:
unsigned char MyChar = 'x';
emit signal(MyChar);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93776
The underlying ABI forces FormatToken to have a lot of padding.
Currently (on x86-64 linux) `sizeof(FormatToken) == 288`. After this patch
`sizeof(FormatToken) == 232`.
No functional changes.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84306
Summary:
The following revision follows D80115 since @MyDeveloperDay and I apparently both had the same idea at the same time, for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 and my efforts on tooling support for AMDVLK, respectively.
This option aligns adjacent bitfield separators across lines, in a manner similar to AlignConsecutiveAssignments and friends.
Example:
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1;
uint32_t exponent : 8;
uint32_t mantissa : 23;
};
```
would become
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1;
uint32_t exponent : 8;
uint32_t mantissa : 23;
};
```
This also handles c++2a style bitfield-initializers with AlignConsecutiveAssignments.
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1 = 0;
uint32_t exponent : 8 = 127;
uint32_t mantissa : 23 = 0;
}; // defaults to 1.0f
```
Things this change does not do:
- Align multiple comma-chained bitfield variables. None of the other
AlignConsecutive* options seem to implement that either.
- Detect bitfields that have a width specified with something other
than a numeric literal (ie, `int a : SOME_MACRO;`). That'd be fairly
difficult to parse and is rare.
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits, MyDeveloperDay
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80176
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43845
When a '//comment' trails a consecutive alignment, it adds a whitespace
replacement within the comment token. This wasn't handled correctly in
the alignment code, which treats it as a whole token and thus double
counts it.
This can wrongly trigger the "line too long, it'll wrap" alignment-break
condition with specific lengths, causing the alignment to break for
seemingly no reason.
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: kostyakozko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79465
Summary:
When multiple ternary operators are chained, e.g. like an if/else-if/
else-if/.../else sequence, clang-format will keep aligning the colon
with the question mark, which increases the indent for each
conditionals:
int a = condition1 ? result1
: condition2 ? result2
: condition3 ? result3
: result4;
This patch detects the situation (e.g. conditionals used in false branch
of another conditional), to avoid indenting in that case:
int a = condition1 ? result1
: condition2 ? result2
: condition3 ? result3
: result4;
When BreakBeforeTernaryOperators is false, this will format like this:
int a = condition1 ? result1 :
condition2 ? result2 :
conditino3 ? result3 :
result4;
This formatting style is referenced here:
https://www.fluentcpp.com/2018/02/27/replace-else-if-ternary-operator/
and here:
https://marcmutz.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/top-5-reasons-you-should-love-your-ternary-operator/
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: hokein, dyung, MyDeveloperDay, acoomans, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50078
Summary:
Currently the 'AlignConsecutive*' options incorrectly align across
elif and else statements, even if they are very far away and across
unrelated preprocessor macros.
This failed since on preprocessor run 2+, there is not enough context
about the #ifdefs to actually differentiate one block from another,
causing them to align across different blocks or even large sections of
the file.
Eg, with AlignConsecutiveAssignments:
```
\#if FOO // Run 1
\#else // Run 1
int a = 1; // Run 2, wrong
\#endif // Run 1
\#if FOO // Run 1
\#else // Run 1
int bar = 1; // Run 2
\#endif // Run 1
```
is read as
```
int a = 1; // Run 2, wrong
int bar = 1; // Run 2
```
The approach taken to fix this was to add a new flag to Token that
forces breaking alignment across groups of lines (MustBreakAlignBefore)
in a similar manner to the existing flag that forces a line break
(MustBreakBefore). This flag is set for the first Token after a
preprocessor statement or diff conflict marker.
Fixes #25167,#31281
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79388
When multiple ternary operators are chained, e.g. like an if/else-if/
else-if/.../else sequence, clang-format will keep aligning the colon
with the question mark, which increases the indent for each
conditionals:
int a = condition1 ? result1
: condition2 ? result2
: condition3 ? result3
: result4;
This patch detects the situation (e.g. conditionals used in false branch
of another conditional), to avoid indenting in that case:
int a = condition1 ? result1
: condition2 ? result2
: condition3 ? result3
: result4;
When BreakBeforeTernaryOperators is false, this will format like this:
int a = condition1 ? result1 :
condition2 ? result2 :
conditino3 ? result3 :
result4;
Summary:
Use spaces instead of tabs for alignment with UT_ForContinuationAndIndentation to make the code aligned for any tab/indent width.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38381
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: fickert
Tags: #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75034
This option behaves similarly to AlignConsecutiveDeclarations and
AlignConsecutiveAssignments, aligning the assignment of C/C++
preprocessor macros on consecutive lines.
I've worked in many projects (embedded, mostly) where header files full
of large, well-aligned "#define" blocks are a common pattern. We
normally avoid using clang-format on these files, since it ruins any
existing alignment in said blocks. This style option will align "simple"
PP macros (no parameters) and PP macros with parameter lists on
consecutive lines.
Related Bugzilla entry (thanks mcuddie):
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20637
Patch by Nick Renieris (VelocityRa)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28462
llvm-svn: 364938
Previously revisions commited non-clang-formatted changes to the Format library, this means submitting any revision e.g. {D55170} can cause additional whitespace changes to potentially be included in a revision.
Commit a non functional change using latest build Windows clang-format r351376 with no other changes, to remove these differences
All FormatTests
pass [==========] 652 tests from 20 test cases ran.
llvm-svn: 355182
Trailing comments are not always aligned properly when UseTab is set to Always.
Consider:
int a; // x
int bbbbbbbb; // x
With .clang-format:
---
Language: Cpp
BasedOnStyle: LLVM
UseTab: Always
...
The trailing comments of this code block should be aligned, but aren't
To align the first trailing comment it needs to insert 8 spaces. This should be
one tab plus six spaces. It skips the logic of the first partial tab in
FirstTabWidth (=2) + Style.TabWidth (=8) <= Spaces (=8) and only inserts one
tab. Proposed fix and test is attached.
Patch by Hylke Kleve.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57655
llvm-svn: 354183
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Bug was caused due to comments at the start of scope. For a code like:
```
int func() { //
int b;
int c;
}
```
the comment at the first line gets IndentAndNestingLevel (1,1) whereas
the following declarations get only (0,1) which prevents them from insertion
of a new scope. So, I changed the AlignTokenSequence to look at previous
*non-comment* token when deciding whether to introduce a new scope into
stack or not.
Patch by Kadir Cetinkaya!
Reviewers: rsmith, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43303
llvm-svn: 338578
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
llvm-svn: 328636
alignments
Indent should be compared before nesting level to determine if a token
is on the same scope as the one we align with. Because it was inverted,
clang-format sometimes tried to align tokens with tokens from outer
scopes, causing the assert(Shift >= 0) to fire.
This fixes bug #33507. Patch by Beren Minor, thank you!
llvm-svn: 311792
Summary:
ColumnLimit = 0 means no limit, so comment should always be aligned if requested. This was broken with
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@304687
introduced via
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33830
and is included in 5.0.0-rc2. This commit fixes it and adds a unittest for this property.
Should go into clang-5.0 IMHO.
Contributed by @pboettch!
Reviewers: djasper, krasimir
Reviewed By: djasper, krasimir
Subscribers: hans, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36967
llvm-svn: 311532
This fixes a bug in `ENAS_DontAlign` (introduced in D32733) where blank lines had an EscapedNewlineColumn of 0, causing a subtraction to overflow when converted back to unsigned and leading to runaway memory allocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36019
llvm-svn: 310539
Summary:
This patch is a follow-up of https://reviews.llvm.org/rL304687, which fixed an
overflow in the comment alignment code in clang-format. The token length of
trailing comments of preprocessor directives is calculated incorrectly by
including the text between consecutive directives. That causes them to not being
aligned.
For example, in this code with column limit 20
```
#if A
#else // A
int iiii;
#endif // B
```
the length of the token `// A` was wrongly calculated as 14 = 5 (the size of `// A\n`) plus 9 (the size of `int iiii;`) and so `// A` wouldn't be aligned with `// B` and this was produced:
```
#if A
#else // A
int iiii;
#endif // B
```
This patch fixes this case.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33982
llvm-svn: 304912
Summary:
This patch fixes a bug where clang-format will align newly broken trailing
comments even if this will make them exceed the line limit. The bug was caused
by a combination of unsigned arithmetic overflow and an imprecise computation
of the length of broken comment lines.
Reviewers: djasper, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33830
llvm-svn: 304687
DontAlign
This converts the clang-format option AlignEscapedNewlinesLeft from a
boolean to an enum, named AlignEscapedNewlines, with options Left (prev.
true), Right (prev. false), and a new option DontAlign.
When set to DontAlign, the backslashes are placed just after the last token in each line:
#define EXAMPLE \
do { \
int x = aaaaa; \
int b; \
int dddddddddd; \
} while (0)
Patch by jtbandes. Thank you!
llvm-svn: 302428
Summary:
The comment aligner was skipping over newly broken comment lines. This patch fixes that.
source:
```
int ab; // line
int a; // long long
```
format with column limit 15 before:
```
int ab; // line
int a; // long
// long
```
format with column limit 15 after:
```
int ab; // line
int a; // long
// long
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29486
llvm-svn: 293997
The main motivation behind this is to cleanup the WhitespaceManager and
make it more extensible for future alignment etc. features.
Specifically, WhitespaceManager has started to copy more and more code
that is already present in FormatToken. Instead, I think it makes more
sense to actually store a reference to each FormatToken for each change.
This has as a consequence led to a change in the calculation of indent
levels. Now, we actually compute them for each Token ahead of time,
which should be more efficient as it removes an unsigned value for the
ParenState, which is used during the combinatorial exploration of the
solution space.
No functional changes intended.
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29300
llvm-svn: 293616
Summary:
This presents a version of the comment reflowing with less mutable state inside
the comment breakable token subclasses. The state has been pushed into the
driving breakProtrudingToken method. For this, the API of BreakableToken is enriched
by the methods getSplitBefore and getLineLengthAfterSplitBefore.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: djasper, klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits, ioeric
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28764
llvm-svn: 293055
Summary:
- Implement clang::tooling::Replacements as a class to provide interfaces to
control how replacements for a single file are combined and provide guarantee
on the order of replacements being applied.
- tooling::Replacements only contains replacements for the same file now.
Use std::map<std::string, tooling::Replacements> to represent multi-file
replacements.
- Error handling for the interface change will be improved in followup patches.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21748
llvm-svn: 277335
As soon as a comment had whitespace changes inside of the token, we
couldn't identify the whole comment as a trailing comment anymore and
alignment stopped working. Add a new boolean to Change for this special
case and fix trailing comment identification to use it.
This also changes WhitespaceManager to sum the length of all Changes
inside of a token into the first Change.
Before this fix
int xy; // a
int z; //b
became
int xy; // a
int z; // b
with this patch we immediately get to:
int xy; // a
int z; // b
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16058
llvm-svn: 257341
Starting here:
int x; // Format this line only.
int xx; //
int xxxxx; //
Before:
int x; // Format this line only.
int xx; //
int xxxxx; //
After:
int x; // Format this line only.
int xx; //
int xxxxx; //
llvm-svn: 257258
aligning assignments.
This was done correctly when aligning the declarations, but not when
aligning assignments.
FIXME: The code between assignments and declarations alignment is
roughly duplicated and
would benefit from factorization.
Bug 25090: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25090
Patch by Beren Minor. Thank you.
llvm-svn: 249552
This allows clang-format to align identifiers in consecutive
declarations. This is useful for increasing the readability of the code
in the same way the alignment of assignations is.
The code is a slightly modified version of the consecutive assignment
alignment code. Currently only the identifiers are aligned, and there is
no support of alignment of the pointer star or reference symbol.
The patch also solve the issue of alignments not being possible due to
the ColumnLimit for both the existing AlignConsecutiveAligments and the
new AlignConsecutiveDeclarations.
Patch by Beren Minor, thank you.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12362
llvm-svn: 248999
Björn Schäpers