Summary: We do not care about intrinsic calls when assigning discriminators.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23212
llvm-svn: 277843
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.
Motivation
----------
Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.
We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.
Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>
llvm-svn: 266446
llvm::getDISubprogram walks the instructions in a function, looking for one in the scope of the current function, so that it can find the !dbg entry for the subprogram itself.
Now that !dbg is attached to functions, this should not be necessary. This patch changes all uses to just query the subprogram directly on the function.
Ideally this should be NFC, but in reality its possible that a function:
has no !dbg (in which case there's likely a bug somewhere in an opt pass), or
that none of the instructions had a scope referencing the function, so we used to not find the !dbg on the function but now we will
Reviewed by Duncan Exon Smith.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18074
llvm-svn: 263184
The discriminators pass relied on the presence of llvm.dbg.cu to decide
whether to add discriminators, but this fails in the case where debug
info is only enabled partially when -fprofile-sample-use is active.
The reason llvm.dbg.cu is not present in these cases is to prevent
codegen from emitting debug info (as it is only used for the sample
profile pass).
This changes the discriminators pass to also emit discriminators even
when debug info is not being emitted.
llvm-svn: 252763
Summary: Call instructions that are from the same line and same basic block needs to have separate discriminators to distinguish between different callsites.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo, dblaikie
Subscribers: dblaikie, probinson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14464
llvm-svn: 252492
Dehao Chen