We were starting to get some name clashes between llvm-pdbdump
and the common CodeView framework, so I took this opportunity
to rename a bunch of files to more accurately describe their
usage. This also helps in llvm-pdbdump to distinguish
between different files and whether they are used for pretty
dump mode or raw dump mode.
llvm-svn: 291627
This creates a centralized class in which to store type records.
It stores types as an array of entries, which matches the
notion of a type stream being a topologically sorted DAG.
Logic to build up such a database was already being used in
CVTypeDumper, so CVTypeDumper is now updated to to read from
a TypeDatabase which is filled out by an earlier visitor in
the pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28486
llvm-svn: 291626
handle generic ranges by using std::begin and std::end rather than
requiring things to look exactly like an STL container.
Much of the credit for this goes to Dave Blaikie who helped me figure
out the right incantations.
This will probably be re-designed when I send this to the maintainers of
gmock, so I've instead structured it to change is little as possible
while it is a local patch. That makes it somewhat ugly, but I think a focused
change is better for getting this to work for LLVM today and letting the
upstream maintainers figure out the correct long-term pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28288
llvm-svn: 291623
This patch reverts r291588: [PGO] Turn off comdat renaming in IR PGO by default,
as we are seeing some hash mismatches in our internal tests.
llvm-svn: 291621
Some of the callers are artificially limiting this transform to integer types;
this should make it easier to incrementally remove that restriction.
llvm-svn: 291620
Summary:
This fixes Transforms/LoopUnroll/runtime-loop3.ll which failed with
EXTENSIVE_DEBUG, because the cloned basic blocks were not added to the
correct sub-loops in LoopUnrollRuntime.cpp.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, mzolotukhin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28482
llvm-svn: 291619
Summary:
Previously if you had
* a function with the fast-math-enabled attr, followed by
* a function without the fast-math attr,
the second function would inherit the first function's fast-math-ness.
This means that mixing fast-math and non-fast-math functions in a module
was completely broken unless you explicitly annotated every
non-fast-math function with "unsafe-fp-math"="false". This appears to
have been broken since r176986 (March 2013), when the resetTargetOptions
function was introduced.
This patch tests the correct behavior as best we can. I don't think I
can test FPDenormalMode and NoTrappingFPMath, because they aren't used
in any backends during function lowering. Surprisingly, I also can't
find any uses at all of LessPreciseFPMAD affecting generated code.
The NVPTX/fast-math.ll test changes are an expected result of fixing
this bug. When FMA is disabled, we emit add as "add.rn.f32", which
prevents fma combining. Before this patch, fast-math was enabled in all
functions following the one which explicitly enabled it on itself, so we
were emitting plain "add.f32" where we should have generated
"add.rn.f32".
Reviewers: mkuper
Subscribers: hfinkel, majnemer, jholewinski, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28507
llvm-svn: 291618
The original code considered only v2i64 as slow for this feature. This patch
consider all 128-bit long vector types as slow candidates.
In internal tests, extending this feature to all 128-bit vector types
resulted in an overall improvement of 1% on Exynos M1.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27998
llvm-svn: 291616
Move the code to update LoopInfo for cloned basic blocks to
addClonedBlockToLoopInfo, as suggested in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28482.
llvm-svn: 291614
Summary:
Convention wisdom says that bytes in Function are precious, and the
vast, vast majority of globals do not live in special sections. Even
when they do, they tend to live in the same section. Store the section
name on the LLVMContext in a StringSet, and maintain a map from
GlobalObject* to section name like we do for metadata, prefix data, etc.
The fact that we've survived this long wasting at least three pointers
of space in Function suggests that Function bytes are perhaps not as
precious as we once thought. Given that most functions have metadata
attachments when debug info is enabled, we might consider adding a
pointer here to make that access more efficient.
Reviewers: jlebar, dexonsmith, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28150
llvm-svn: 291613
When choosing the best successor for a block, ordinarily we would have preferred
a block that preserves the CFG unless there is a strong probability the other
direction. For small blocks that can be duplicated we now skip that requirement
as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27742
llvm-svn: 291609
I have two immediate motivations for adding this:
1) It makes writing expectations in tests *dramatically* easier. A
quick example that is a taste of what is possible:
std::vector<int> v = ...;
EXPECT_THAT(v, UnorderedElementsAre(1, 2, 3));
This checks that v contains '1', '2', and '3' in some order. There
are a wealth of other helpful matchers like this. They tend to be
highly generic and STL-friendly so they will in almost all cases work
out of the box even on custom LLVM data structures.
I actually find the matcher syntax substantially easier to read even
for simple assertions:
EXPECT_THAT(a, Eq(b));
EXPECT_THAT(b, Ne(c));
Both of these make it clear what is being *tested* and what is being
*expected*. With `EXPECT_EQ` this is implicit (the LHS is expected,
the RHS is tested) and often confusing. With `EXPECT_NE` it is just
not clear. Even the failure error messages are superior with the
matcher based expectations.
2) When testing any kind of generic code, you are continually defining
dummy types with interfaces and then trying to check that the
interfaces are manipulated in a particular way. This is actually what
mocks are *good* for -- testing *interface interactions*. With
generic code, there is often no "fake" or other object that can be
used.
For a concrete example of where this is currently causing significant
pain, look at the pass manager unittests which are riddled with
counters incremented when methods are called. All of these could be
replaced with mocks. The result would be more effective at testing
the code by having tighter constraints. It would be substantially
more readable and maintainable when updating the code. And the error
messages on failure would have substantially more information as
mocks automatically record stack traces and other information *when
the API is misused* instead of trying to diagnose it after the fact.
I expect that #1 will be the overwhelming majority of the uses of gmock,
but I think that is sufficient to justify having it. I would actually
like to update the coding standards to encourage the use of matchers
rather than any other form of `EXPECT_...` macros as they are IMO
a strict superset in terms of functionality and readability.
I think that #2 is relatively rarely useful, but there *are* cases where
it is useful. Historically, I think misuse of actual mocking as
described in #2 has led to resistance towards this framework. I am
actually sympathetic to this -- mocking can easily be overused. However
I think this is not a significant concern in LLVM. First and foremost,
LLVM has very careful and rare exposure of abstract interfaces or
dependency injection, which are the most prone to abuse with mocks. So
there are few opportunities to abuse them. Second, a large fraction of
LLVM's unittests are testing *generic code* where mocks actually make
tremendous sense. And gmock is well suited to building interfaces that
exercise generic libraries. Finally, I still think we should be willing
to have testing utilities in tree even if they should be used rarely. We
can use code review to help guide the usage here.
For a longer and more complete discussion of this, see the llvm-dev
thread here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108672.html
The general consensus seems that this is a reasonable direction to start
down, but that doesn't mean we should race ahead and use this
everywhere. I have one test that is blocked on this to land and that was
specifically used as an example. Before widespread adoption, I'm going
to work up some (brief) guidelines as some of these facilities should be
used sparingly and carefully.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28156
llvm-svn: 291606
If a vector index is out of bounds, the result is supposed to be
undefined but is not undefined behavior. Change the legalization
for indexing the vector on the stack so that an out of bounds
index does not create an out of bounds memory access.
llvm-svn: 291604
When we collect 2 uses of a function in FindUses and then RAUW when we
visit the first, we end up visiting the wrapper (because the second was
RAUW'd). We still want to use RAUW instead of just Use->set() because
it has special handling for Constants, so this patch just ensures that
only one use of each constant is added to the work list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28504
llvm-svn: 291603
Support for DW_FORM_implicit_const DWARFv5 feature.
When this form is used attribute value goes to .debug_abbrev section (as SLEB).
As this form would break any debug tool which doesn't support DWARFv5
it is guarded by dwarf version check. Attempt to use this form with
dwarf version <= 4 is considered a fatal error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28456
llvm-svn: 291599
Summary:
openSuse has AArch64 support, with images running on the Raspberry Pi 3.
The libraries and headers live under the aarch64-suse-linux subdirectory,
which is currently not in the AArch64 triples list. Address this by adding
the corresponding string to AArch64Triples.
Reviewers: chandlerc, bruno, bkramer, rengolin
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28238
llvm-svn: 291598
Following the similar change to lit configuration, ensure that all CMake
booleans are canonicalized to 0/1 when being passed to llvm-config. This
fixes the incorrect interpretation of values when user passes another
value than the ON/OFF, and simplifies the code by removing unnecessary
string matching.
Furthermore, the code for --has-rtti and --has-global-isel has been
modified to print consistent values indepdently of the boolean used by
passed by the user to CMake. Sadly, the code already implicitly used
different values for the two (YES/NO for --has-rtti, ON/OFF for
--has-global-isel).
Include tests for all booleans and multi-value options in llvm-config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28366
llvm-svn: 291593
This is to make sure this check is called even when building as
part of LLVM runtimes when we are doing standalone but not out of
tree build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28392
llvm-svn: 291592
All the existing runtimes relies on flags which are set by AddLLVM
and HandleLLVMOptions. In the standalone case, they would include
these themselves, but when being built using LLVM runtimes we should
include these in the top-level runtimes CMake files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28389
llvm-svn: 291590
Bail out instead of asserting when we encounter this situation,
which can actually happen.
The reason the test uses the new PM is that the "bad" phi, incidentally, gets
cleaned up by LoopSimplify. But LICM can create this kind of phi and preserve
loop simplify form, so the cleanup has no chance to run.
This fixes PR31190.
We may want to solve this in a less conservative manner, since this phi is
actually uniform within the inner loop (or we may want LICM to output a cleaner
promotion to begin with).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28490
llvm-svn: 291589
Summary:
In IR PGO we append the function hash to comdat functions to avoid the
potential hash mismatch. This turns out not legal in some cases: if the comdat
function is address-taken and used in comparison. Renaming changes the semantic.
This patch turns off comdat renaming by default.
To alleviate the hash mismatch issue, we now rename the profile variable
for comdat functions. Profile allows co-existing multiple versions of profiles
with different hash value. The inlined copy will always has the correct profile
counter. The out-of-line copy might not have the correct count. But we will
not have the bogus mismatch warning.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, xur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28416
llvm-svn: 291588
This patch fix PR31351: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31351
1. This patch adds new type of shuffle lowering
2. We can use the expand instruction, When the shuffle pattern is as following:
{ 0*a[0]0*a[1]...0*a[n] , n >=0 where a[] elements in a ascending order}.
Reviewers: 1. igorb
2. guyblank
3. craig.topper
4. RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28352
llvm-svn: 291584
Sema treats pointers to static member functions as having function pointer
type, so treat treat them as function pointer values in the analyzer as well.
This prevents an assertion failure in SValBuilder::evalBinOp caused by code
that expects function pointers to be Locs (in contrast, PointerToMember values
are nonlocs).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28033
llvm-svn: 291581
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'target teams distribute simd’ pragma.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28252
llvm-svn: 291579
Zachary Turner