their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.
To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,
template<typename X> template<typename Y>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
return X();
}
we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.
Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 80044
member templates declared inside other templates. This allows us to
match out-of-line definitions of member function templates within
class templates to the declarations within the class template. We
still can't handle out-of-line definitions for member class templates,
however.
llvm-svn: 79955
and will participate in overload resolution. Unify the instantiation
of CXXMethodDecls and CXXConstructorDecls, which had already gotten
out-of-sync.
llvm-svn: 79658
FriendFunctionDecl, and create instances as appropriate.
The design of FriendFunctionDecl is still somewhat up in the air; you can
befriend arbitrary types of functions --- methods, constructors, etc. ---
and it's not clear that this representation captures that very well.
We'll have a better picture when we start consuming this data in access
control.
llvm-svn: 78653
Fixes PR4704 problems
Addresses Eli's patch feedback re: ugly cast code
Updates all postfix operators to remove ParenListExprs. While this is awful,
no better solution (say, in the parser) is obvious to me. Better solutions
welcome.
llvm-svn: 78621
--- Reverse-merging r78535 into '.':
D test/Sema/altivec-init.c
U include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
U include/clang/AST/Expr.h
U include/clang/AST/StmtNodes.def
U include/clang/Parse/Parser.h
U include/clang/Parse/Action.h
U tools/clang-cc/clang-cc.cpp
U lib/Frontend/PrintParserCallbacks.cpp
U lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp
U lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
U lib/Sema/Sema.h
U lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
U lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateExpr.cpp
U lib/AST/StmtProfile.cpp
U lib/AST/Expr.cpp
U lib/AST/StmtPrinter.cpp
U lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
U lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
llvm-svn: 78551
In addition to being defined by the AltiVec PIM, this is also the vector
initializer syntax used by OpenCL, so that vector literals are compatible
with macro arguments.
llvm-svn: 78535
implementation of '#pragma unused' by not constructing intermediate
DeclRefExprs, but instead do the name lookup directly. The
implementation is greatly simplified.
Along the way, degrade '#pragma unused(undeclaredvariable)' to a
warning instead of being a hard error. This implements:
<rdar://problem/6761874> [sema] allow #pragma unused to reference undefined variable (with warning)
llvm-svn: 78019
elsewhere. Very slightly decouples DeclSpec users from knowing the exact
diagnostics to report, and makes it easier to provide different diagnostics in
some places.
llvm-svn: 77990
and __has_trivial_constructor builtin pseudo-functions and
additionally implements __has_trivial_copy and __has_trivial_assign,
from John McCall!
llvm-svn: 76916
point that covers templates and non-templates. This should eliminate
the flood of warnings I introduced yesterday.
Removed the ActOnClassTemplate action, which is no longer used.
llvm-svn: 76881
templates, e.g.,
template<typename T>
struct Outer {
struct Inner;
};
template<typename T>
struct Outer<T>::Inner {
// ...
};
Implementing this feature required some extensions to ActOnTag, which
now takes a set of template parameter lists, and is the precursor to
removing the ActOnClassTemplate function from the parser Action
interface. The reason for this approach is simple: the parser cannot
tell the difference between a class template definition and the
definition of a member of a class template; both have template
parameter lists, and semantic analysis determines what that template
parameter list means.
There is still some cleanup to do with ActOnTag and
ActOnClassTemplate. This commit provides the basic functionality we
need, however.
llvm-svn: 76820
declaration in the AST.
The new ASTContext::getCommentForDecl function searches for a comment
that is attached to the given declaration, and returns that comment,
which may be composed of several comment blocks.
Comments are always available in an AST. However, to avoid harming
performance, we don't actually parse the comments. Rather, we keep the
source ranges of all of the comments within a large, sorted vector,
then lazily extract comments via a binary search in that vector only
when needed (which never occurs in a "normal" compile).
Comments are written to a precompiled header/AST file as a blob of
source ranges. That blob is only lazily loaded when one requests a
comment for a declaration (this never occurs in a "normal" compile).
The indexer testbed now supports comment extraction. When the
-point-at location points to a declaration with a Doxygen-style
comment, the indexer testbed prints the associated comment
block(s). See test/Index/comments.c for an example.
Some notes:
- We don't actually attempt to parse the comment blocks themselves,
beyond identifying them as Doxygen comment blocks to associate them
with a declaration.
- We won't find comment blocks that aren't adjacent to the
declaration, because we start our search based on the location of
the declaration.
- We don't go through the necessary hops to find, for example,
whether some redeclaration of a declaration has comments when our
current declaration does not. Similarly, we don't attempt to
associate a \param Foo marker in a function body comment with the
parameter named Foo (although that is certainly possible).
- Verification of my "no performance impact" claims is still "to be
done".
llvm-svn: 74704
Another case where we should use SmallVector::data() instead of taking the
address of element 0 of a SmallVector when the SmallVector has no elements.
llvm-svn: 74556
Douglas Gregor