Splits fuchsia-default-arguments check into two checks. fuchsia-default-arguments-calls warns if a function or method is called with default arguments. fuchsia-default-arguments-declarations warns if a function or method is declared with default parameters.
Committed on behalf of @diegoast (Diego Astiazarán).
Resolves b38051.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62437
llvm-svn: 363712
On Android, pipe() is better to be replaced by pipe2() with O_CLOEXEC
flag to avoid file descriptor leakage.
Patch by Jian Cai!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61967
llvm-svn: 362673
On Android, pipe2() is better to set O_CLOEXEC flag to avoid file
descriptor leakage.
Patch by Jian Cai!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62049
llvm-svn: 362672
Summary:
Added WarnOnlyIfThisHasSuspiciousField option to allow
to catch any copy assignment operator independently from
the container class's fields.
Added the cert alias using this option.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62192
llvm-svn: 361550
Catching trivial objects by value is not dangerous but may be
inefficient if they are too large. This patch adds an option
`WarnOnLargeObject` to the checker to also warn if such an object
is caught by value. An object is considered as "large" if its
size is greater than `MaxSize` which is another option. Default
value is the machine word of the architecture (size of the type
`size_t`).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61851
llvm-svn: 361225
Summary:
modernize-loop-convert was not detecting implicit casts to
const_iterator as convertible to range-based loops:
std::vector<int> vec{1,2,3,4}
for(std::vector<int>::const_iterator i = vec.begin();
i != vec.end();
++i) { }
Thanks to Don Hinton for advice.
As well, this change adds a note for this check's applicability to code
targeting OpenMP prior version 5 as this check will continue breaking
compilation with `-fopenmp`. Thanks to Roman Lebedev for pointing this
out.
Fixes PR#35082
Patch by Torbjörn Klatt!
Reviewed By: hintonda
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61827
llvm-svn: 360788
Summary:
modernize-loop-convert was not detecting implicit casts to
const_iterator as convertible to range-based loops:
std::vector<int> vec{1,2,3,4}
for(std::vector<int>::const_iterator i = vec.begin();
i != vec.end();
++i) { }
Thanks to Don Hinton for advice.
As well, this change adds a note for this check's applicability to code
targeting OpenMP prior to version 5 as this check will continue breaking
compilation with `-fopenmp`. Thanks to Roman Lebedev for pointing this
out.
Fixes PR#35082
Reviewed By: hintonda
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61827
llvm-svn: 360785
Implement a check for detecting if/else if/else chains where two or more
branches are Type I clones of each other (that is, they contain identical code)
and for detecting switch statements where two or more consecutive branches are
Type I clones of each other.
Patch by Donát Nagy!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54757
llvm-svn: 360779
Summary:
This check searches for copy assignment operators which might not handle self-assignment properly. There are three patterns of
handling a self assignment situation: self check, copy-and-swap or the less common copy-and-move. The new check warns if none of
these patterns is found in a user defined implementation.
See also:
OOP54-CPP. Gracefully handle self-copy assignment
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/cplusplus/OOP54-CPP.+Gracefully+handle+self-copy+assignment
Reviewers: JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: riccibruno, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60507
llvm-svn: 360540
Add the modernize-use-trailing-return check to rewrite function signatures to use trailing return types.
Patch by Bernhard Manfred Gruber.
llvm-svn: 360438
Summary:
Looks at conditionals and finds cases of ``cast<>``, which will
assert rather than return a null pointer, and ``dyn_cast<>`` where
the return value is not captured. Additionally, finds cases that
match the pattern ``var.foo() && isa<X>(var.foo())``, where the
method is called twice and could be expensive.
.. code-block:: c++
// Finds cases like these:
if (auto x = cast<X>(y)) <...>
if (cast<X>(y)) <...>
// But not cases like these:
if (auto f = cast<Z>(y)->foo()) <...>
if (cast<Z>(y)->foo()) <...>
Reviewers: alexfh, rjmccall, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xbolva00, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59802
llvm-svn: 359142
Summary:
This check aims to address a relatively common benign error where
Objective-C subclass initializers call -self on their superclass instead
of invoking a superclass initializer, typically -init. The error is
typically benign because libobjc recognizes that improper initializer
chaining is common¹.
One theory for the frequency of this error might be that -init and -self
have the same return type which could potentially cause inappropriate
autocompletion to -self instead of -init. The equal selector lengths and
triviality of common initializer code probably contribute to errors like
this slipping through code review undetected.
This check aims to flag errors of this form in the interests of
correctness and reduce incidence of initialization failing to chain to
-[NSObject init].
[1] "In practice, it will be hard to rely on this function.
Many classes do not properly chain -init calls."
From _objc_rootInit in https://opensource.apple.com/source/objc4/objc4-750.1/runtime/NSObject.mm.auto.html.
Test Notes:
Verified via `make check-clang-tools`.
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59806
llvm-svn: 358620
Summary:
The bugprone-too-small-loop-variable check often catches loop variables which can represent "big enough" values, so we don't actually need to worry about that this variable will overflow in a loop when the code iterates through a container. For example a 32 bit signed integer type's maximum value is 2 147 483 647 and a container's size won't reach this maximum value in most of the cases.
So the idea of this option to allow the user to specify an upper limit (using magnitude bit of the integer type) to filter out those catches which are not interesting for the user, so he/she can focus on the more risky integer incompatibilities.
Next to the option I replaced the term "positive bits" to "magnitude bits" which seems a better naming both in the code and in the name of the new option.
Reviewers: JonasToth, alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59870
llvm-svn: 358356
Summary: There's a typo in the docs, as mentioned in the title. Please see the diff.
Reviewers: JonasToth
Subscribers: sylvestre.ledru, nemanjai, kbarton, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60050
llvm-svn: 357371
Makes the name of this directory consistent with the names of the other
directories in clang-tools-extra.
Similar to r356254. No intended behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59750
llvm-svn: 356897
Summary:
Finally, we are here!
Analyzes OpenMP Structured Blocks and checks that no exception escapes
out of the Structured Block it was thrown in.
As per the OpenMP specification, structured block is an executable statement,
possibly compound, with a single entry at the top and a single exit at the
bottom. Which means, ``throw`` may not be used to to 'exit' out of the
structured block. If an exception is not caught in the same structured block
it was thrown in, the behaviour is undefined / implementation defined,
the program will likely terminate.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, baloghadamsoftware, gribozavr
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, rnkovacs, guansong, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, ABataev
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59466
llvm-svn: 356802
Summary:
Finds OpenMP directives that are allowed to contain `default` clause,
but either don't specify it, or the clause is specified but with the kind
other than `none`, and suggests to use `default(none)` clause.
Using `default(none)` clause changes the default variable visibility from
being implicitly determined, and thus forces developer to be explicit about the
desired data scoping for each variable.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, xazax.hun, hokein, gribozavr
Reviewed By: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jdoerfert, openmp-commits, klimek, sbenza, arphaman, Eugene.Zelenko, ABataev, mgorny, rnkovacs, guansong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57113
llvm-svn: 356801
Summary:
In contrast to Google C++, Objective-C often uses built-in integer types
other than `int`. In fact, the Objective-C runtime itself defines the
types NSInteger¹ and NSUInteger² which are variant types depending on
the target architecture. The Objective-C style guide indicates that
usage of system types with variant sizes is appropriate when handling
values provided by system interfaces³. Objective-C++ is commonly the
result of conversion from Objective-C to Objective-C++ for the purpose
of integrating C++ functionality. The opposite of Objective-C++ being
used to expose Objective-C functionality to C++ is less common,
potentially because Objective-C has a signficantly more uneven presence
on different platforms compared to C++. This generally predisposes
Objective-C++ to commonly being more Objective-C than C++. Forcing
Objective-C++ developers to perform conversions between variant system types
and fixed size integer types depending on target architecture when
Objective-C++ commonly uses variant system types from Objective-C is
likely to lead to more bugs and overhead than benefit. For that reason,
this change proposes to disable google-runtime-int in Objective-C++.
[1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/objectivec/nsinteger?language=objc
[2] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/objectivec/nsuinteger?language=objc
[3] "Types long, NSInteger, NSUInteger, and CGFloat vary in size between
32- and 64-bit builds. Use of these types is appropriate when handling
values exposed by system interfaces, but they should be avoided for most
other computations."
https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/objcguide.md#types-with-inconsistent-sizes
Subscribers: xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59336
llvm-svn: 356627
Summary:
-ignore specifies a list of PP callbacks to ignore. It cannot express a
whitelist, which may be more useful than a blacklist.
Add a new option -callbacks to replace it.
-ignore= (default) => -callbacks='*' (default)
-ignore=FileChanged,FileSkipped => -callbacks='*,-FileChanged,-FileSkipped'
-callbacks='Macro*' : print only MacroDefined,MacroExpands,MacroUndefined,...
Reviewers: juliehockett, aaron.ballman, alexfh, ioeric
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59296
llvm-svn: 356366
Summary:
Addressing: PR25010 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25010
Code like:
```
if(true) var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
is reformatted to be
```
if (true)
var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
Even when `AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine` is true
The following revision comes from a +1'd suggestion in the PR to support AllowShortIfElseStatementsOnASingleLine
This suppresses the clause prevents the merging of the if when there is a compound else
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, reuk
Reviewed By: reuk
Subscribers: reuk, Higuoxing, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59087
llvm-svn: 356029
This is an analog of the abseil-duration-comparison check, but for the
absl::Time domain. It has a similar implementation and tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58977
llvm-svn: 355835
Summary:
The usefulness of **modernize-use-override** can be reduced if you have to live in an environment where you support multiple compilers, some of which sadly are not yet fully C++11 compliant
some codebases have to use override as a macro OVERRIDE e.g.
```
// GCC 4.7 supports explicit virtual overrides when C++11 support is enabled.
```
This allows code to be compiled with C++11 compliant compilers and get warnings and errors that clang, MSVC,gcc can give, while still allowing other legacy pre C++11 compilers to compile the code. This can be an important step towards modernizing C++ code whilst living in a legacy codebase.
When it comes to clang tidy, the use of the **modernize-use-override** is one of the most useful checks, but the messages reported are inaccurate for that codebase if the standard approach is to use the macros OVERRIDE and/or FINAL.
When combined with fix-its that introduce the C++11 override keyword, they become fatal, resulting in the modernize-use-override check being turned off to prevent the introduction of such errors.
This revision, allows the possibility for the replacement **override **to be a macro instead, Allowing the clang-tidy check to be run on both pre and post C++11 code, and allowing fix-its to be applied.
Reviewers: alexfh, JonasToth, hokein, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh, JonasToth
Subscribers: lewmpk, malcolm.parsons, jdoerfert, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57087
llvm-svn: 355132
Julie Hockett