ContainsActiveParameter is not used anywhere, set incorrectly (see the
removed FIXME) and has no unit tests.
Removing it to simplify the code.
llvm-svn: 362686
Summary:
By producing the $0 marker in the snippets at the last placeholder.
This produces nicer results in most cases, e.g. for
namespace <#name#> {
<#decls#>
}
we now produce ${0:decls} instead of ${2:decls} and the final cursor
placement is more convenient.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62389
llvm-svn: 361841
Summary: Embedding clients want to experiment with showing such results in e.g. a different color.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61588
llvm-svn: 360039
Summary:
The hope is this will catch a few patterns with repetition:
SomeClass* S = ^SomeClass::Create()
int getFrobnicator() { return ^frobnicator_; }
// discard the factory, it's no longer valid.
^MyFactory.reset();
Without triggering antipatterns too often:
return Point(x.first, x.^second);
I'm going to gather some data on whether this turns out to be a win overall.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61537
llvm-svn: 360030
Summary:
This is a tricky case (we baked the assumption that symbols come from
the preamble xor mainfile pretty deeply) and the fix is a bit of a hack:
We look at the code to guess the macro names, and deserialize them from
the preamble "by hand".
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60937
........
Fix buildbots http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast/builds/47684/
llvm-svn: 359796
Summary:
This is a tricky case (we baked the assumption that symbols come from
the preamble xor mainfile pretty deeply) and the fix is a bit of a hack:
We look at the code to guess the macro names, and deserialize them from
the preamble "by hand".
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60937
llvm-svn: 359778
Summary: We scrape the enclosing scopes from the source file, and use them in the query.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61077
llvm-svn: 359284
Summary:
It's never set to true. Its only effect would be to set stdout to binary mode.
Hopefully we have better ways of doing this by now :-)
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60871
llvm-svn: 358696
Summary:
Previously, we would use include spelling of the declaring header to check
whether the inserted header is the same as the main file. This doesn't help because
we only have file path of the main file.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60687
llvm-svn: 358496
Summary:
o Lex the code to get the identifiers and put them into a "symbol" index.
o Adds a new completion mode without compilation/sema into code completion workflow.
o Make IncludeInserter work even when no compile command is present, by avoiding
inserting non-verbatim headers.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60126
llvm-svn: 358159
Summary:
There are cases where Sema can't tell that "foo" in foo::Bar is a
namespace qualifier, like in incomplete macro expansions.
After this patch, if sema reports no specifier but it looks like there's one in
the source code, then we take it into account.
Reworked structure and comments in getQueryScopes to try to fight
creeping complexity - unsure if I succeeded.
I made the test harder (the original version also passes).
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60503
llvm-svn: 358091
Summary: One clear use case: use with an editor that reacts poorly to edits above the cursor.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60409
llvm-svn: 358075
Summary:
Intent is to use the heuristically-parsed scope in cases where we get bogus
results from sema, such as in complex macro expansions.
Added a motivating testcase we currently get wrong.
Name changed because we (already) use this for things other than speculation.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60500
llvm-svn: 358074
Summary:
This introduces ~4k new symbols, and ~10k refs for LLVM. We need that
information for providing better code navigation support:
- When references for a class template is requested, we should return these specializations as well.
- When children of a specialization is requested, we should be able to query for those symbols(instead of just class template)
Number of symbols: 378574 -> 382784
Number of refs: 5098857 -> 5110689
Reviewers: hokein, gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: nridge, ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59083
llvm-svn: 356125
Summary:
Suppose `clangd::` is unresolved in the following example. Currently,
we simply use "clangd::" as the query scope. We can do better by combining with
accessible scopes in the context. The query scopes can be `{clangd::, clang::clangd::}`.
```
namespace clang { clangd::^ }
```
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall, hokein, kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58448
llvm-svn: 354963
Summary:
This enables clangd to intercept compiler diagnostics and attach fixes (e.g. by
querying index). This patch adds missing includes for incomplete types e.g.
member access into class with only forward declaration. This would allow adding
missing includes for user-typed symbol names that are missing declarations
(e.g. typos) in the future.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56903
llvm-svn: 352361
ClangTidyOptions::getDefaults is not free, it will initialize all
clang-tidy modules to get check-specific options, and we don't use this
information in CodeComplete, so using an empty one (constructed by
default constructor) is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 351826
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The new guideline is to qualify with 'llvm::' explicitly both in
'.h' and '.cpp' files. This simplifies moving the code between
header and source files and is easier to keep consistent.
llvm-svn: 350531
Summary:
The isIndexedForCodeCompletion is called in the code patch of
SymbolCollector.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55206
llvm-svn: 348130
Summary: E.g. allow injected "A::A" in `using A::A^` but not in "A^".
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55065
llvm-svn: 347982
Summary:
For example, when anonymous namespace is present, duplicated namespaces might be
generated for the enclosing namespace.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54105
llvm-svn: 346224
The intention was to fall through to Function case in LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=Off builds.
Use #ifndef NDEBUG to fix -Wimplicit-fallthrough
llvm-svn: 345953
Summary:
These are available via qualifiers, but signal to noise level is low.
Keep required quailifier machinery around though, for cross-ns completion.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53571
llvm-svn: 345141
Standardize on the most common namespace setup in our *.cpp files:
using namespace llvm;
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(StringRef) { ... }
And remove redundant llvm:: qualifiers. (Except for cases like
make_unique where this causes problems with std:: and ADL).
This choice is pretty arbitrary, but some broad consistency is nice.
This is going to conflict with everything. Sorry :-/
Squash the other configurations:
A)
using namespace llvm;
using namespace clang;
using namespace clangd;
void clangd::foo(StringRef);
This is in some of the older files. (It prevents accidentally defining a
new function instead of one in the header file, for what that's worth).
B)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
void foo(llvm::StringRef) { ... }
This is fine, but in practice the using directive often gets added over time.
C)
namespace clang {
namespace clangd {
using namespace llvm; // inside the namespace
This was pretty common, but is a bit misleading: name lookup preferrs
clang::clangd::foo > clang::foo > llvm:: foo (no matter where the using
directive is).
llvm-svn: 344850
Summary:
This should make all-scope completion more usable. Scope proximity for
indexes will be added in followup patch.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53131
llvm-svn: 344688
This patch moves the virtual file system form clang to llvm so it can be
used by more projects.
Concretely the patch:
- Moves VirtualFileSystem.{h|cpp} from clang/Basic to llvm/Support.
- Moves the corresponding unit test from clang to llvm.
- Moves the vfs namespace from clang::vfs to llvm::vfs.
- Formats the lines affected by this change, mostly this is the result of
the added llvm namespace.
RFC on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126657.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52783
llvm-svn: 344140
queue is not used after index-provided completions' merge with those from Sema
USRGeneration.h is not used after introduction of getSymbolID
llvm-svn: 343912
Summary:
The file stats can be reused when preamble is reused (e.g. code
completion). It's safe to assume that cached status is not outdated as we
assume preamble files to remain unchanged.
On real file system, this made code completion ~20% faster on a measured file
(with big preamble). The preamble build time doesn't change much.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52419
llvm-svn: 343576
Summary:
Since we plan to move handling of override suggestions to Sema with
D52225 this patch just makes sure clangd-side has no logic related to that
anymore and updates tests.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52226
llvm-svn: 343567
Summary:
When no scope qualifier is specified, allow completing index symbols
from any scope and insert proper automatically. This is still experimental and
hidden behind a flag.
Things missing:
- Scope proximity based scoring.
- FuzzyFind supports weighted scopes.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: kbobyrev, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52364
llvm-svn: 343248
Ilya Biryukov