As mentionned in D97044, it is fine if users include <atomic> and then
include <stdatomic.h> -- we don't need to error out for that case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125579
I think this notion of libc++abi's version was relevant a long time ago
on Apple platforms when we were using a Xcode project to build the library.
As part of moving Apple's build to CMake, D59489 made it possible to
specify the "ABI version" of libc++abi in use. However, it's not possible
to build libc++abi with that old ABI anymore and we don't need the ability
to link against that version from libc++ anymore.
Hence, we can clean this up and stop falsely pretending that libc++abi
has more than one ABI version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125687
This is a variant of D116689 rebased on top of the new (proposed) ABI
refactoring in D120727. It should conserve the basic properties of the
original patch by @phosek, except it also allows cleaning up the merging
of libc++abi into libc++ from the libc++ side.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125393
`std::views::drops` and `std::views::join` have been implemented, but the tests
verifying the CPOs for them are still commented out. Uncomment the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125618
Quite a few C++20 LWG issues/papers related to the One Ranges Proposal
were already effectively implemented (or contain semantic-only wording
changes that don't affect the implementation), mark them as such.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125065
This simplifies the string structs a bit more and the normal layout should not contain any undefined behaviour anymore. I don't think there is a way to achieve this in the alternate string mode without breaking the ABI.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125496
For example, we used to trigger CI even for commits that touched a file
whose path contained 'cmake', even if it's not the root cmake directory.
Fix that.
Standalone builds have been deprecated and then removed for a while now.
Trying to use standalone builds leads to a fatal CMake error, so this
code is all dead. Remove it to clean things up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125561
This patch overhauls how we pick up the ABI library. Instead of setting
ad-hoc flags, it creates interface targets that can be linked against by
the rest of the build, which is easier to follow and extend to support
new ABI libraries.
This is intended to be a NFC change, however there are some additional
simplifications and improvements we can make in the future that would
require a slight behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120727
We add `--unwindlib=none` to `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS`
to make sure that builds with a yet-incomplete toolchain succeed,
to avoid linker failures about missing unwindlib.
When this option is added to `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS`, it gets added to
both compile and link commands in CMake compile tests. If
`--unwindlib=none` is included in compilation commands, it causes
warnings about unused arguments, as the flag only is relevant for
linking.
Due to the warnings in CMake tests, the later CMake test for the
`-Werror` option failed (as the tested `-Werror` option caused the
preexisting warning due to unused `--unwindlib=none` to become a
hard error). Therefore, most CI configurations that build with
`LIBCXX_ENABLE_WERROR` didn't actually end up enabling `-Werror`
after all.
When looking at the CI build log of recent CI builds, they do
end up printing:
-- Performing Test LIBCXX_SUPPORTS_WERROR_FLAG
-- Performing Test LIBCXX_SUPPORTS_WERROR_FLAG - Failed
-- Performing Test LIBCXX_SUPPORTS_WX_FLAG
-- Performing Test LIBCXX_SUPPORTS_WX_FLAG - Failed
Thus while the configurations are meant to error out on warnings,
they actually haven't done that, due to the interaction of these
options.
To fix this, remove the individual cases of adding `--unwindlib=none`
into `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS` in libcxx and libunwind.
`runtimes/CMakeLists.txt` still adds `--unwindlib=none` if needed, but
not otherwise. (The same issue with enabling `-Werror` does remain
if `--unwindlib=none` strictly is needed though - that can be fixed
separately afterwards.)
These individual cases in libunwind and libcxx were added while
standalone builds of the runtimes still were supported - but no longer
are necessary now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124375
I guess this is an ABI break for the 32 bit AIX configuration, but I'm
not sure if that one is meant to be ABI stable yet or not.
Previously, this used int32_t for this type on linux, but int64_t
on all other platforms. This was added in D68480 /
54fa9ecd30, but I don't really see
any discussion around this detail there.
Switching this to 32 bit on 32 bit AIX silences these libcxx build
warnings:
```
In file included from /scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/libcxx/src/atomic.cpp:12:
/scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/build/aix/include/c++/v1/atomic:1005:12: warning: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (8 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (4 bytes) [-Watomic-alignment]
return __c11_atomic_fetch_add(&__a->__a_value, __delta, static_cast<__memory_order_underlying_t>(__order));
^
/scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/build/aix/include/c++/v1/atomic:948:12: warning: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (8 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (4 bytes) [-Watomic-alignment]
return __c11_atomic_load(const_cast<__ptr_type>(&__a->__a_value), static_cast<__memory_order_underlying_t>(__order));
^
/scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/build/aix/include/c++/v1/atomic:1000:12: warning: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (8 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (4 bytes) [-Watomic-alignment]
return __c11_atomic_fetch_add(&__a->__a_value, __delta, static_cast<__memory_order_underlying_t>(__order));
^
/scratch/powerllvm/cpap8006/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/build/aix/include/c++/v1/atomic:1022:12: warning: large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty; the access size (8 bytes) exceeds the max lock-free size (4 bytes) [-Watomic-alignment]
return __c11_atomic_fetch_sub(&__a->__a_value, __delta, static_cast<__memory_order_underlying_t>(__order));
^
4 warnings generated.
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124519
This isn't a configuration that we unfortunately can add to
the CI practically at the moment, but I do run the tests
sporadically offline in this configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124993
After feedback from D122861, do the same thing with some of the other headers. Try to move the
headers so they have a similar style and way of doing things.
Reviewed By: ldionne, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124227
This only adds the customization point object (which isn't pipeable),
the view itself has already been implemented previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124978
[libcxx] Reject month 0 in get_date/__get_month
This fixes#47663.
Months in dates should be >= 1 and <= 12.
We parse up to two digits then minus one, because
we want to store this as "months since January"
(0-11).
However we didn't check that the result of that
was not -1. For example if you had (MM/DD/YYYY)
00/21/2022.
Added tests for:
* Failing if month is 0
* Failing if month is 13
* Allowing a leading zero in month e.g. "01"
Note that libc++ and libstdc++ return different
values on parsing failure, and MSVC STL returns
end of stream instead.
Handle the first two by checking for defines, MSVC STL
expects these tests to fail for other reasons already:
https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/main/tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt#L372
so not handling that case here.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124175
On targets without unistd.h or sys/wait.h (such as bare metal targets)
any test that uses check_assertion.h will fail, so add
REQUIRES: has-unix-headers to them and autodetect whether we have
these headers or not.
These tests currently have unsupported on windows, but that's exactly
because windows doesn't have these headers so we can remove the
specific check for windows.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124623
Adding a mingw based config is easy in the current CI environment
(where we can just choose the different target by calling
`i686-w64-mingw32-clang`), while adding a clang-cl based config would
require setting up different environment variables pointing to the
i386 library directory.
Just adding one config (DLL) instead of exhaustively testing both
(DLL and static) as very few tests would differ in practice, to keep
the CI load reasonable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124991
This test only fails on x86_64 clang-cl, not for i386.
(The root cause is still not explored, thus the FIXME is still
relevant.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124994
All current Windows architectures (i386, x86_64, arm, arm64) get
the full_size() behaviour here. x86_64 (the only one tested in CI
currently) is handled by the first ifdef at the top, but handle
Windows in general on all other architectures later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124989
There are many more instances of this pattern, but I chose to limit this change to .rst files (docs), anything in libcxx/include, and string literals. These have the highest chance of being seen by end users.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante, martong, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124708
Several helper functions specify preconditions as comments, but we never
check them. I ran across a bug report (without a reproducer) in this code,
and I thought that having these assertions in place would make it easier
to troubleshoot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124477
Reorganize the test and simplify the #ifdefs. Fix a typo in __powerpc64__
as a fly-by, and also add a test for the unstable ABI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124403
Replace all the instances of `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` with `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` and `_VSTD` with `std`.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124662
We are considering to make -fsanitize-memory-param-retval enabled by default so probably this patch is unnneded.
Reviewed By: #libc, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123979
The GCC failures were partly fixed in D124103.
The format functions tests are fixed on GCC but they require a huge
amount of RAM (>10 GB). This fails with parallel testing in the CI. It
can be solved by splitting the test, but GCC-12 will be released shortly
and might fix the memory usage in these tests. Therefore these tests
remain disabled.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124335
Detected on many lld tests with -fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor.
Also https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast after D122869 will report a lot of them.
Threads may outlive static variables. Even if ~__thread_specific_ptr() does nothing, lifetime of members ends with ~ and accessing the value is UB https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.life#1
```
==9214==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
#0 0x557e1cec4539 in __libcpp_tls_set ../include/c++/v1/__threading_support:428:12
#1 0x557e1cec4539 in set_pointer ../include/c++/v1/thread:196:5
#2 0x557e1cec4539 in void* std::__msan::__thread_proxy<
std::__msan::tuple<...>, llvm::parallel::detail::(anonymous namespace)::ThreadPoolExecutor::ThreadPoolExecutor(llvm::ThreadPoolStrategy)::'lambda'()::operator()() const::'lambda'()> >(void*) ../include/c++/v1/thread:285:27
Memory was marked as uninitialized
#0 0x557e10a0759d in __sanitizer_dtor_callback compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:940:5
#1 0x557e1d8c478d in std::__msan::__thread_specific_ptr<std::__msan::__thread_struct>::~__thread_specific_ptr() libcxx/include/thread:188:1
#2 0x557e10a07dc0 in MSanCxaAtExitWrapper(void*) compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1151:3
```
The test needs D123979 or -fsanitize-memory-param-retval enabled by default.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122864
Louis Dionne