This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow
syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression
could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if
it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used.
It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we
currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses
after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing
conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in
principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference
variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required,
perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code,
which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this
approach).
llvm-svn: 291318
Specifically, when we have this situation:
struct A {
template <typename T> struct B {
int m1 = sizeof(A);
};
B<int> m2;
};
We can't parse m1's initializer eagerly because we need A to be
complete. Therefore we wait until the end of A's class scope to parse
it. However, we can trigger instantiation of B before the end of A,
which will attempt to instantiate the field decls eagerly, and it would
build a bad field decl instantiation that said it had an initializer but
actually lacked one.
Fixed by deferring instantiation of default member initializers until
they are needed during constructor analysis. This addresses a long
standing FIXME in the code.
Fixes PR19195.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5690
llvm-svn: 222192
In addition to storing more useful information in the AST, this
fixes a semantic check in template instantiation which checks whether
the l-paren location is valid.
Fixes PR16903.
llvm-svn: 188495
have a direct mismatch between some component of the template and some
component of the argument. The diagnostic now says what the mismatch was, but
doesn't yet say which part of the template doesn't match.
llvm-svn: 174039
Sema::RequireCompleteExprType() a bit more, setting the point of
instantiation if needed, and skipping explicit specializations entirely.
llvm-svn: 132547
of incomplete array type, attempt to complete the array type. This was
made much easier by Chandler's addition of RequireCompleteExprType(),
which I've tweaked (slightly) to improve the consistency of the
DeclRefExpr. Fixes PR7985.
llvm-svn: 132530
within class templates when they are necessary to complete the type of
the member. The canonical example is code like:
template <typename T> struct S {
static const int arr[];
static const int x;
static int f();
};
template <typename T> const int S<T>::arr[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
template <typename T> const int S<T>::x = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
template <typename T> int S<T>::f() { return x; }
int x = S<int>::f();
We need to instantiate S<T>::arr's definition to pick up its initializer
and complete the array type. This involves new code to specially handle
completing the type of an expression where the type alone is
insufficient. It also requires *updating* the expression with the newly
completed type. Fortunately, all the other infrastructure is already in
Clang to do the instantiation, do the completion, and prune out the
unused bits of code that result from this instantiation.
This addresses the initial bug in PR10001, and will be a step to
fleshing out other cases where we need to work harder to complete an
expression's type. Who knew we still had missing C++03 "features"?
llvm-svn: 132172
used to do this, but it got lost when we switched functional-style
cast syntax over to using the new initialization code. Fixes PR6457.
llvm-svn: 97568
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Richard Smith