This particular linker invocation is only run to check that we accept
options, but we don't inspect the generated command line. As all other
commands in the file have their output piped to FileCheck, the lit test
doesn't print any other output; therefore silence this one for consistency
as well.
This is consistent with how clang prints its internal commands with
-### and -v.
When linking with -verbose, we get log messages from the actual
linking written to stderr. By printing the command to the same stream,
we make sure they appear in a sensible chronological order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104527
getLineNumber() was counting the number of line feeds from the start of
the buffer to the current token. For large linker scripts this became a
performance bottleneck. For one 4MB linker script over 4 minutes was
spent in getLineNumber's StringRef::count.
Store the line number from the last token, and only count the additional
line feeds since the last token.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104137
This reverts commit e1adf90826.
This appears to affect the way that C++ mangled symbols appear in the
import library when using a .def file that names a C++ free function
with no name decoration. I will follow up with a reduced test case
shortly.
Fixes PR50529. With this, lld-linked Chromium base_unittests passes on arm macs.
Surprisingly, no measurable impact on link time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104681
The variable used to need the wider scope, but doesn't after the
reland. See LC_LINKER_OPTIONS-related discussion on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104353 for background.
Real zerofill sections go after __thread_bss, since zerofill sections
must all be at the end of their segment and __thread_bss must be right
after __thread_data.
Works fine already, but wasn't tested as far as I can tell.
Also tweak comment about zerofill sections a bit.
No behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104609
We make it less than INT_MAX in order not to conflict with the ordering
of zerofill sections, which must always be placed at the end of their
segment.
This is the more structural fix for the issue addressed in {D104596}.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104607
This is run every time around in the main linker loop. Once a match
has been found, stop trying to rematch such a symbol.
Not sure if this has any actual measurable performance impact though
(SymbolTable::findMangle() iterates over the whole symbol table for
each call and does fuzzy matching on top of that) but this makes the
code more reassuring to read at least. (This is in practice run for def
files listing undecorated stdcall functions to be exported.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104529
Pass the original argv[0] to the coff linker, as the coff linker uses
the basename of argv[0] as the log prefix.
This makes error messages to be printed with a "ld.lld:" prefix
instead of "lld-link:". The current "lld-link:" prefix can be confusing
to users, as they're invoking the MinGW linker (and might not even have
a lld-link executable).
Keep the first argument as lld-link when printing the command line, to
make it an actually reproducible standalone command.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104526
The exact location doesn't matter, but it should be in front
of __thread_bss. We put it right in front of __thread_data
which is where ld64 seems to put it as well.
Fixes PR50769.
(As mentioned on the bug, there is probably a more structural
fix too, see comment 5. If we don't address this, it's likely
we'll run into this again with other synthetic sections. But
for now, let's fix the immediate breakage.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104596
...instead of S_NON_LAZY_SYMBOL_POINTERS. This matches ld64.
Part of PR50769.
While here, also remove an old TODO that was done in D87178.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104594
findLibrary() returned a StringRef while findFramework & other helper
functions returned std::strings. Standardize on std::string.
(I initially tried making the helper functions all return StringRefs,
but I realized we shouldn't return input StringRefs since their
lifetimes would not be obvious from the calling code.)
Previously, we asserted that such a case was invalid, but in fact
`ld -r` can emit such symbols if the input contained a (true) private
extern, or if it contained a symbol started with "L".
Non-extern symbols marked as private extern are essentially equivalent
to regular TU-scoped symbols, so no new functionality is needed.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104502
The `icf` command-line option is not present in ld64, so it should use the LLD option syntax, which begins with double dashes and separates primary option from any suboption with the equal sign.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104548
This change revisits https://reviews.llvm.org/D79248 which originally
added support for the --unresolved-symbols flag.
At the time I thought it would make sense to add a third option to this
flag called `import-functions` but it turns out (as was suspects by on
the reviewers IIRC) that this option can be authoganal.
Instead I've added a new option called `--import-undefined` that only
operates on symbols that can be imported (for example, function symbols
can always be imported as opposed to data symbols we can only be
imported when compiling with PIC).
This option gives us the full expresivitiy that emscripten needs to be
able allow reporting of undefined data symbols as well as the option to
disable that.
This change does remove the `--unresolved-symbols=import-functions`
option, which is been in the codebase now for about a year but I would
be extremely surprised if anyone was using it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103290
ICF = Identical C(ode|OMDAT) Folding
This is the LLD ELF/COFF algorithm, adapted for MachO. So far, only `-icf all` is supported. In order to support `-icf safe`, we will need to port address-significance tables (`.addrsig` directives) to MachO, which will come in later diffs.
`check-{llvm,clang,lld}` have 0 regressions for `lld -icf all` vs. baseline ld64.
We only run ICF on `__TEXT,__text` for reasons explained in the block comment in `ConcatOutputSection.cpp`.
Here is the perf impact for linking `chromium_framekwork` on a Mac Pro (16-core Xeon W) for the non-ICF case vs. pre-ICF:
```
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 4.27 4.44 4.34 4.349 0.043029977
+ 20 4.37 4.46 4.405 4.4115 0.025188761
Difference at 95.0% confidence
0.0625 +/- 0.0225658
1.43711% +/- 0.518873%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0352566)
```
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103292
We need to dedup archive loads (similar to what we do for dylib
loads).
I noticed this issue after building some Swift stuff that used
`-force_load_swift_libs`, as it caused some Swift archives to be loaded
many times.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104353
After D77330, the comments are inconsistent with the disassembled code.
As the value of `far` has been changed, a thunk to reach it is now
generated, and target addresses of branch instructions are different
from what was initially expected.
The patch fixes that and makes the test closer to what it was originally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104286
The following class isn't part of the export table; there's a
second correctly placed comment about the things that actually
belong to the export table.
I removed them in rG5de7467e982 but @thakis pointed out that
they were useful to keep, so here they are again. I've also converted
the `!isCoalescedWeak()` asserts into `!shouldOmitFromOutput()` asserts,
since the latter check subsumes the former.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104169
It's a warning in ld64. While having LLD be stricter would be nice, it
makes it harder for it to be a drop-in replacement into existing builds.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104333
During PHDR creation, the case where an output section does not require a
PT_LOAD header but still occupies memory in the current VMA region was not handled.
If such an output section interleaves two output sections that have the same
VMA and LMA regions set, we would previously re-use the existing PT_LOAD header
for the second output section.
However, since the memory region is not contiguous, we need to start a new PT_LOAD
segment.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50558
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103815
I *think* this is the fix, with the regression being introduced by
D104199. Not 100% sure since MSAN isn't supported on my Mac machine, and
it'll take some time to spin up a Linux box... will look at the
buildbots for answers
I wanted to see if we would get any perf wins out of this, but
it doesn't seem to be the case. But it still seems worth committing.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104200
We don't need to define any special behavior for this section,
so creating a subclass for it is redundant.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104199
`outSecFileOff` and the associated `getFileOffset()` accessors were
unnecessary.
For all the cases we care about, `outSecFileOff` is the same as
`outSecOff`. The only time they deviate is if there are zerofill
sections within a given segment. But since zerofill sections are always
at the end of a segment, the only sections where the two values deviate
are zerofill sections themselves. And we never actually query the
outSecFileOff of zerofill sections.
As for `getFileOffset()`, the only place it was being used was to
calculate the offset of the entry symbol. However, we can compute that
value by just taking the difference between the address of the entry
symbol and the address of the Mach-O header. In fact, this appears to be
what ld64 itself does. This difference is the same as the file offset as
long as there are no intervening zerofill sections, but since `__text`
is the first section in `__TEXT`, this never happens, so our previous
use of `getFileOffset()` was not wrong -- just inefficient.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104177
This implements https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26404
An `OVERWRITE_SECTIONS` command is a `SECTIONS` variant which contains several
output section descriptions. The output sections do not have specify an order.
Similar to `INSERT [BEFORE|AFTER]`, `LinkerScript::hasSectionsCommand` is not
set, so the built-in rules (see `docs/ELF/linker_script.rst`) still apply.
`OVERWRITE_SECTIONS` can be more convenient than `INSERT` because it does not
need an anchor section.
The initial syntax is intentionally narrow to facilitate backward compatible
extensions in the future. Symbol assignments cannot be used.
This feature is versatile. To list a few usage:
* Use `section : { KEEP(...) }` to retain input sections under GC
* Define encapsulation symbols (start/end) for an output section
* Use `section : ALIGN(...) : { ... }` to overalign an output section (similar to ld64 `-sectalign`)
When an output section is specified by both `OVERWRITE_SECTIONS` and
`INSERT`, `INSERT` is processed after overwrite sections. To make this work,
this patch changes `InsertCommand` to use name based matching instead of pointer
based matching. (This may cause a difference when `INSERT` moves one output
section more than once. Such duplicate commands should not be used in practice
(seems that in GNU ld the output sections may just disappear).)
A linker script can be used without -T/--script. The traditional `SECTIONS`
commands are concatenated, so a wrong rule can be more noticeable from the
section order. This feature if misused can be less noticeable, just like
`INSERT`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103303
Martin Storsjö