There are slight differences between /GR- and -fno-rtti which made
mapping one to the other inappropriate.
-fno-rtti disables dynamic_cast, typeid, and does not emit RTTI related
information for the v-table.
/GR- does not generate complete object locators and thus will not
reference them in vftables. However, constructs like dynamic_cast and
typeid are permitted.
This should bring our implementation of RTTI up to semantic parity with
MSVC modulo bugs.
llvm-svn: 212138
The pointer for a class's RTTI data comes right before the VFTable but
has no name. To be properly compatible with this, we do the following:
* Create a single GlobalVariable which holds the contents of the VFTable
_and_ the pointer to the RTTI data.
* Create a GlobalAlias, with appropriate linkage/visibility, that points
just after the RTTI data pointer. This ensures that the VFTable
symbol will always refer to VFTable data.
* Create a Comdat with a "Largest" SelectionKind and stick the private
GlobalVariable in it. By transitivity, the GlobalAlias will be a
member of the Comdat group. Using "Largest" ensures that foreign
definitions without an RTTI data pointer will _not_ be chosen in the
final linked image.
Whether or not we emit RTTI data depends on several things:
* The -fno-rtti flag implies that we should never not emit a pointer to
RTTI data before the VFTable.
* __declspec(dllimport) brings in the VFTable from a remote DLL. Use an
available_externally GlobalVariable to provide a local definition of
the VFTable. This means that we won't have any available_externally
definitions of things like complete object locators. This is
acceptable because they are never directly referenced.
To my knowledge, this completes the implementation of MSVC RTTI code
generation.
Further semantic work should be done to properly support /GR-.
llvm-svn: 212125
Summary:
This merges VFPtrInfo and VBTableInfo into VPtrInfo, since they hold
almost the same information. With that change, the vbtable mangling
code can easily be applied to vftable data and we magically get the
correct, unambiguous vftable names.
Fixes PR17748.
Reviewers: timurrrr, majnemer
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2893
llvm-svn: 202425
Erroring out until we fix the bug means we don't have to keep chasing down
this same miscompile in a bunch of different places.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2890
llvm-svn: 202331
In the Microsoft ABI, the vftable is laid out as if all methods in every
overload set were declared in reverse order of declaration at the point
of declaration of the first overload in the set.
Previously we only considered virtual methods in an overload set, but
MSVC includes non-virtual methods for ordering purposes.
Fixes PR18902.
llvm-svn: 201722
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
Summary:
This makes us more compatible with MSVC 2012+ and fixes PR17748 where we
would give two tables the same name.
Rather than doing a fresh depth-first traversal of the inheritance graph
for every record's vbtables, now we memoize vbtable paths for each
record. By doing memoization, we end up considering virtual bases of
subobjects that come later in the depth-first traversal. Where
previously we would have ignored a virtual base that we'd already seen,
we now consider it for name mangling purposes without emitting a
duplicate vbtable for it.
Reviewers: majnemer
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2509
llvm-svn: 198462
Summary:
No functionality change.
This code should live here long-term because we should be able to use it
to compute correct vftable names.
It turns out that the most natural way to implement the naming algorithm
is to use a caching layer similar to what we already have for virtual
table info in VTableContext. Subsequent changes will take advantage of
this to fix PR17748, where we have a vbtable name collision.
Reviewers: majnemer
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2499
llvm-svn: 198380
Most importantly, this makes our vtable layout match MSVC's. Previously
we would emit a return adjusting thunk whenever the return types
differed, even if the adjustment would have been trivial.
MSVC does emit some trivial return adjusting thunks, but only if there
was already an overridden method that required a return adjustment.
llvm-svn: 198080
Now CodeGenVTables has only one VTableContext object, which is either
Itanium or Microsoft.
Fixes a FIXME with no functionality change intended.
Ideally we could avoid the downcasts by pushing the things that
reference the Itanium vtable context into ItaniumCXXABI.cpp, but we're
not there yet.
llvm-svn: 197845
This was part of the cause for PR17655. We were generating thunks when
we shouldn't have. I suspect that if we tweak the test case for PR17655
to actually require thunks, we can reproduce the same crash.
llvm-svn: 197836
This makes it consistent with -fdump-record-layouts, which was moved to
outs() in r186219. My reasoning for going with stdout is that when one
of these options is present, the layouts are really a program output,
and shouldn't be interleaved with diagnostics, which are on stderr.
Reviewers: timurrrr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2127
llvm-svn: 194279
Timur Iskhodzhanov