I believe this technically fixes a multithreaded race condition in this code. But my primary concern was as part of looking at removing the ability to treat Statistics like a plain unsigned. There are many weird operations on Statistics in the codebase.
llvm-svn: 303314
EarlyCSE should not just ignore assumes. It should use the fact that its condition is true for all dominated instructions.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, apilipenko, anna, skatkov
Reviewed By: reames, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32482
llvm-svn: 301625
If a condition is calculated only once, and there are multiple guards on this condition, we should be able
to remove all guards dominated by the first of them. This patch allows EarlyCSE to try to find the condition
of a guard among the known values, and if it is true, remove the guard. Otherwise we keep the guard and
mark its condition as 'true' for future consideration.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, apilipenko, skatkov, anna, dberlin
Reviewed By: reames, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32476
llvm-svn: 301623
Analysis, it has Analysis passes, and once NewGVN is made an Analysis,
this removes the cross dependency from Analysis to Transform/Utils.
NFC.
llvm-svn: 299980
Add updater to passes that now need it.
Move around code in MemorySSA to expose needed functions.
Summary: Mostly cleanup
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30221
llvm-svn: 295887
a function's CFG when that CFG is unchanged.
This allows transformation passes to simply claim they preserve the CFG
and analysis passes to check for the CFG being preserved to remove the
fanout of all analyses being listed in all passes.
I've gone through and removed or cleaned up as many of the comments
reminding us to do this as I could.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28627
llvm-svn: 292054
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
llvm-svn: 289756
Now that MemorySSA keeps track of whether MemoryUses are optimized, use
getClobberingMemoryAccess() to check MemoryUse memory dependencies since
it should no longer be so expensive.
This is a follow-up change to https://reviews.llvm.org/D25881
llvm-svn: 285080
Summary:
When using MemorySSA, re-optimize MemoryPhis when removing a store since
this may create MemoryPhis with all identical arguments.
Also, when using MemorySSA to check if two MemoryUses are reading from
the same version of the heap, use the defining access instead of calling
getClobberingAccess, since the latter can currently result in many more
AA calls. Once the MemorySSA use optimization tracking changes are
done, we can remove this limitation, which should result in more loads
being CSE'd.
Reviewers: dberlin
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25881
llvm-svn: 284984
Summary:
Use MemorySSA, if requested, to do less conservative memory dependency
checking.
This change doesn't enable the MemorySSA enhanced EarlyCSE in the
default pipelines, so should be NFC.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, reames, majnemer
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19821
llvm-svn: 280279
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.
Thanks to David for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 278077
Some instructions may have their uses replaced with a symbolic constant.
However, the instruction may still have side effects which percludes it
from being removed from the function. EarlyCSE treated such an
instruction as if it were removed, resulting in PR28763.
llvm-svn: 277114
r273711 was reverted by r273743. The inliner needs to know about any
call sites in the inlined function. These were obscured if we replaced
a call to undef with an undef but kept the call around.
This fixes PR28298.
llvm-svn: 273753
Redundant invariant loads can be CSE'ed with very little extra effort
over what early-cse already tracks, so it looks reasonable to make
early-cse handle this case.
llvm-svn: 272954
This moves some logic added to EarlyCSE in rL268120 into
`llvm::isInstructionTriviallyDead`. Adds a test case for DCE to
demonstrate that passes other than EarlyCSE can now pick up on the new
information.
llvm-svn: 268126
Summary:
This change teaches EarlyCSE some basic properties of guard intrinsics:
- Guard intrinsics read all memory, but don't write to any memory
- After a guard has executed, the condition it was guarding on can be
assumed to be true
- Guard intrinsics on a constant `true` are no-ops
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19578
llvm-svn: 268120
The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267231
We take the intersection of overflow flags while CSE'ing.
This permits us to consider two instructions with different overflow
behavior to be replaceable.
llvm-svn: 267153
EarlyCSE had inconsistent behavior with regards to flag'd instructions:
- In some cases, it would pessimize if the available instruction had
different flags by not performing CSE.
- In other cases, it would miscompile if it replaced an instruction
which had no flags with an instruction which has flags.
Fix this by being more consistent with our flag handling by utilizing
andIRFlags.
llvm-svn: 267111
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267022
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
This was originally a pointer to support pass managers which didn't use
AnalysisManagers. However, that doesn't realistically come up much and
the complexity of supporting it doesn't really make sense.
In fact, *many* parts of the pass manager were just assuming the pointer
was never null already. This at least makes it much more explicit and
clear.
llvm-svn: 263219
The rules for removing trivially dead stores are a lot less complicated than loads. Since we know the later store post dominates the former and the former dominates the later, unless the former has side effects other than the actual store, we can remove it. One slightly surprising thing is that we can freely remove atomic stores, even if the later one isn't atomic. There's no guarantee the atomic one was every visible.
For the moment, we don't handle DSE of ordered atomic stores. We could extend the same chain of reasoning to them, but the catch is we'd then have to model the ordering effect without a store instruction. Since our fences are a stronger than our operation orderings, simple using a fence isn't an obvious win. This arguable calls for a refinement in our fence specification, but that's (much) later work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15352
llvm-svn: 255914
Extend EarlyCSE with an additional style of dead store elimination. If we write back a value just read from that memory location, we can eliminate the store under the assumption that the value hasn't changed.
I'm implementing this mostly because I noticed the omission when looking at the code. It seemed strange to have InstCombine have a peephole which was more powerful than EarlyCSE. :)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15397
llvm-svn: 255739
This patch teaches the fully redundant load part of EarlyCSE how to forward from atomic and volatile loads and stores, and how to eliminate unordered atomics (only). This patch does not include dead store elimination support for unordered atomics, that will follow in the near future.
The basic idea is that we allow all loads and stores to be tracked by the AvailableLoad table. We store a bit in the table which tracks whether load/store was atomic, and then only replace atomic loads with ones which were also atomic.
No attempt is made to refine our handling of ordered loads or stores. Those are still treated as full fences. We could pretty easily extend the release fence handling to release stores, but that should be a separate patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15337
llvm-svn: 255054
254950 ended up being not NFC. The previous code was overriding the flags for whether an instruction read or wrote memory using the target specific flags returned via TTI. I'd missed this in my refactoring. Since I mistakenly built only x86 and didn't notice the number of unsupported tests, I didn't catch that before the original checkin.
This raises an interesting issue though. Given we have function attributes (i.e. readonly, readnone, argmemonly) which describe the aliasing of intrinsics, why does TTI have this information overriding the instruction definition at all? I see no reason for this, but decided to preserve existing behavior for the moment. The root issue might be that we don't have a "writeonly" attribute.
Original commit message:
[EarlyCSE] Simplify and invert ParseMemoryInst [NFCI]
Restructure ParseMemoryInst - which was introduced to abstract over target specific load and stores instructions - to just query the underlying instructions. In theory, this could be slightly slower than caching the results, but in practice, it's very unlikely to be measurable.
The simple query scheme makes it far easier to understand, and much easier to extend with new queries. Given I'm about to need to add new query types, doing the cleanup first seemed worthwhile.
Do we still believe the target specific intrinsic handling is worthwhile in EarlyCSE? It adds quite a bit of complexity and makes the code harder to read. Being able to delete the abstraction entirely would be wonderful.
llvm-svn: 254957
Craig Topper