Add a test for the R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 relocation to an undefined symbol. We
have to use yaml2obj as llvm-mc relaxes the narrow branch to a b.w which
uses the R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 relocation instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50234
llvm-svn: 338999
The sphinx build bot is erroring on these examples for some unknown
reason, and really the dso_local doesn't seem to be relevant to the
example in any way so its cleaner to omit it. And now they will look
a bit more like other (successful) IR examples.
llvm-svn: 338998
Summary:
This patch makes the clang-rename.py script useable for vim with only python3
support. It uses the print-function and adjust the doc slightly to mention
the correct python3 command for the letter mapping in vim.
Reviewers: arphaman, klimek, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50307
llvm-svn: 338996
Multiple failues reported by sanitizer-x86_64-linux, seem to be caused by this
patch. Reverting to see if they sustain without it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50172
llvm-svn: 338994
`isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition` is able to prove non-null basing on `br` or `guard`
by `%p != null` condition, but is unable to do so basing on `(%p != null) && %other_cond`.
This patch allows it to do so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50172
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 338990
Generate DILabel metadata and call llvm.dbg.label after label
statement to associate the metadata with the label.
After fixing PR37395.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45045
llvm-svn: 338989
If there is a frequently taken branch dominated by a guard, and its condition is available
at the point of the guard, we can widen guard with condition of this branch and convert
the branch into unconditional:
guard(cond1)
if (cond2) {
// taken in 99.9% cases
// do something
} else {
// do something else
}
Converts to
guard(cond1 && cond2)
// do something
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49974
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 338988
After refactoring DbgInfoIntrinsic class hierarchy, we use
DbgVariableIntrinsic as the base class of variable debug info.
In resolveTopLevelMetadata() in CGVTables.cpp, we only care about
dbg.value, so we try to cast the instructions to DbgVariableIntrinsic
before resolving variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50226
llvm-svn: 338985
In the past, DbgInfoIntrinsic has a strong assumption that these
intrinsics all have variables and expressions attached to them.
However, it is too strong to derive the class for other debug entities.
Now, it has problems for debug labels.
In order to make DbgInfoIntrinsic as a base class for 'debug info', I
create a class for 'variable debug info', DbgVariableIntrinsic.
DbgDeclareInst, DbgAddrIntrinsic, and DbgValueInst will be derived from it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50220
llvm-svn: 338984
highlighting syntax.
Most of them already were like this, and the Sphinx runs on the docs
build bot seems to be substantially more picky and/or not have support
for a bunch of the syntax here. Hopefully this will let it progress past
this.
My previous attempt to fix the syntax made the `opt` tool happy, but no
idea what the Sphinx stuff is really looking for, and the fact that
other blocks already just use `text` led me to this solution.
llvm-svn: 338983
Notably, just close two of the debug info metadata nodes early rather
than leaving them open with `...` which won't ever lex correctly. And
add the missing `:` on the count labels.
Slowly progressing through all of the warnings on the documentation
build bot. Sorry to do this one commit at a time, but despite my best
efforts I can't trigger these errors locally.
llvm-svn: 338982
Sphinx syntax highlighter.
This example also doesn't really make sense. There is no control flow or
clarification of what the `Safe:` block exists to do... If we want
examples here, we should make them much more clear in addition to making
them well formed IR sequences.
llvm-svn: 338981
This appears to produce a warning on the docs build bot. It doesn't
reproduce for me, likely because I have a newer (or more full featured)
pygments install.
llvm-svn: 338978
Sphinx.
We think the bot is updated now, so trying this again. I'm landing it
(with permission) as Michael is at a con at the moment.
Actual patch largely by Michael Spencer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44910
llvm-svn: 338977
Summary:
We already have the same check directly before, so this code can never be
reached (as seen in the test coverage).
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50317
llvm-svn: 338976
This code was moved out from BasicObjectLayerMaterializationUnit, which required
the supplied object to be well formed. The getObjectSymbolFlags function does
not require a well-formed object, so we have to propagate the error here.
llvm-svn: 338975
Summary:
Optimization remark format is slightly changed by LLVM patch D49412.
Two tests are fixed with expected messages changed.
Frankly speaking I have not tested this change yet. I will test when manage to setup the project.
Reviewers: xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50241
llvm-svn: 338971
Summary:
Optimization remark format is slightly changed by LLVM patch D49412.
One test is fixed with expected messages changed.
Frankly speaking I have not tested this change yet. I will test when manage to setup the project.
Reviewers: xbolva00, espindola
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50242
llvm-svn: 338970
Summary:
This patch improves Inliner to provide causes/reasons for negative inline decisions.
1. It adds one new message field to InlineCost to report causes for Always and Never instances. All Never and Always instantiations must provide a simple message.
2. Several functions that used to return the inlining results as boolean are changed to return InlineResult which carries the cause for negative decision.
3. Changed remark priniting and debug output messages to provide the additional messages and related inline cost.
4. Adjusted tests for changed printing.
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: craig.topper, sammccall, sgraenitz, NutshellySima, shchenz, chandlerc, apilipenko, javed.absar, tejohnson, dblaikie, sanjoy, eraman, xbolva00
Reviewed By: tejohnson, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, llvm-commits, arsenm, mehdi_amini, eraman, haicheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49412
llvm-svn: 338969
There are a bunch of edge cases and inconsistencies in how we're emitting sections
cause this warning to fire and it needs more work.
This reverts commit r335558.
llvm-svn: 338968
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/IT3
Comes up in the [most ugliest] signed int -> signed char case of
-fsanitize=implicit-conversion (https://reviews.llvm.org/D50250)
Not sure if we want to do it always, or only when it is free to invert.
llvm-svn: 338967
These forward declarations for various classes in the Type
hierarchy are not needed since they are all forward declared
systematically a few lines below.
llvm-svn: 338966
Looks like the only reason we use a unique_ptr here is so that we can
conditionally construct a LogicalErrorHandler. It's a small type, and
Optional can do the same thing with 100% fewer heap allocations.
llvm-svn: 338962
This allows us to model the common LLVM idiom of incrementing
immediately after dereferencing so that we can remove or update the
entity w/o losing our ability to reach the "next".
However, these are not real or proper iterators. They are just enough to
allow range based for loops and very simple range algorithms to work,
but should not be considered full general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49956
llvm-svn: 338955
Summary:
Previously, in the NewPM pipeline, TailCallElim recalculates the DomTree when it modifies any instruction in the Function.
For example,
```
CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(&I);
...
CI->setTailCall();
Modified = true;
...
if (!Modified || ...)
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
```
After applying this patch, the DomTree only recalculates if needed (plus an extra insertEdge() + an extra deleteEdge() call).
When optimizing SQLite with `-passes="default<O3>"` pipeline of the newPM, the number of DomTree recalculation decreases by 6.2%, the number of nodes visited by DFS decreases by 2.9%. The time used by DomTree will decrease approximately 1%~2.5% after applying the patch.
Statistics:
```
Before the patch:
23010 dom-tree-stats - Number of DomTree recalculations
489264 dom-tree-stats - Number of nodes visited by DFS -- DomTree
After the patch:
21581 dom-tree-stats - Number of DomTree recalculations
475088 dom-tree-stats - Number of nodes visited by DFS -- DomTree
```
Reviewers: kuhar, dmgreen, brzycki, grosser, davide
Reviewed By: kuhar, brzycki
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49982
llvm-svn: 338954
This simplifies the code a bit.
It is NFC except that it removes early exit for Count == 0
which does not seem to be useful (we have no such tests either).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49136
llvm-svn: 338953
I noticed a suspicious failure:
[ RUN ] VMRange.CollectionContains
llvm/src/tools/lldb/unittests/Utility/VMRangeTest.cpp:146: Failure
Value of: VMRange::ContainsRange(collection, VMRange(0x100, 0x104))
Actual: false
Expected: true
Looking at the code, it is a very real bug:
class RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate {
public:
RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate(VMRange range) : _range(range) {} // note that _range binds to a temporary!
bool operator()(const VMRange &range) const {
return range.Contains(_range);
}
const VMRange &_range;
};
This change fixes the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50290
llvm-svn: 338949
Peter Smith