Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adrian Prantl 1eadba1c8c Renumber testcase metadata nodes after r290153.
This patch renumbers the metadata nodes in debug info testcases after
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769. This is a separate patch because it
causes so much churn. This was implemented with a python script that
pipes the testcases through llvm-as - | llvm-dis - and then goes
through the original and new output side-by side to insert all
comments at a close-enough location.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27765

llvm-svn: 290292
2016-12-22 00:45:21 +00:00
Adrian Prantl bceaaa9643 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 290153
2016-12-20 02:09:43 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 73ec065604 Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).

Sorry for the churn!

llvm-svn: 289982
2016-12-16 19:39:01 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 74a835cda0 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289920
2016-12-16 04:25:54 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 03c6d31a3b Revert "[IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable."
This reverts commit 289902 while investigating bot berakage.

llvm-svn: 289906
2016-12-16 01:00:30 +00:00
Adrian Prantl ce13935776 [IR] Remove the DIExpression field from DIGlobalVariable.
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.

Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:

(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
    not how to get to its location.

(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
    replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.

(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
    more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
    DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s).  We also moved away from attaching the
    DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.

<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769

llvm-svn: 289902
2016-12-16 00:36:43 +00:00
Victor Leschuk 2ede126b1b DebugInfo: preparation to implement DW_AT_alignment
- Add alignment attribute to DIVariable family
 - Modify bitcode format to match new DIVariable representation
 - Update tests to match these changes (also add bitcode upgrade test)
 - Expect that frontend passes non-zero align value only when it is not default
   (was forcibly aligned by alignas()/_Alignas()/__atribute__(aligned())

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25073

llvm-svn: 284678
2016-10-20 00:13:12 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne d4135bbc30 DebugInfo: New metadata representation for global variables.
This patch reverses the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable.
This will allow us to more easily preserve debug info metadata when
manipulating global variables.

Fixes PR30362. A program for upgrading test cases is attached to that
bug.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20147

llvm-svn: 281284
2016-09-13 01:12:59 +00:00
Adrian Prantl f0a41089ff Debug Info: Don't emit bitfields in the DWARF4 format when tuning for GDB.
As discovered in PR27758, GDB does not fully support the DWARF 4 format.
This patch ensures we always emit bitfields in the DWARF 2 when tuning for GDB.

llvm-svn: 269827
2016-05-17 20:12:08 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 7aa34c8cbb Debug Info: Don't emit a DW_AT_data_member_location for DWARF bitfields.
The DWARF spec states that a member entry may have either a
DW_AT_data_member_location or a DW_AT_data_bit_offset, but not both.

This fixes a bug found in PR 27758.

llvm-svn: 269731
2016-05-17 02:37:53 +00:00
Adrian Prantl e7d833defb Debug info: Don't emit a DW_AT_byte_size when emitting a DWARF4 bit field.
The DWARF spec clearly states that a bit field member should have either a
DW_AT_byte_size or a DW_AT_bit_size, but not both.
Also the DW_AT_byte_size is redundant with the size of the type of the member.

This fixes a bug found in PR 27758.

llvm-svn: 269714
2016-05-16 22:45:10 +00:00
Adrian Prantl f393d313ec Debug info: Support DWARF4 bitfields via DW_AT_data_bit_offset.
The DWARF2 specification of DW_AT_bit_offset was written from the perspective of
a big-endian machine with unclear semantics for other systems.  DWARF4
deprecated DW_AT_bit_offset and introduced a new attribute DW_AT_data_bit_offset
that simply counts the number of bits from the beginning of the containing
entity regardless of endianness.

After this patch LLVM emits DW_AT_bit_offset for DWARF 2 or 3 and
DW_AT_data_bit_offset when DWARF 4 or later is requested.

llvm-svn: 267895
2016-04-28 15:37:48 +00:00