This is still an experimental attribute, but I wanted it in tree
for review. It may still get yanked.
This attribute can only be applied to a class @interface, not
a class extension or category. It does not change the type
system rules for Objective-C, but rather the implementation checking
for Objective-C classes that explicitly conform to a protocol.
During protocol conformance checking, clang recursively searches
up the class hierarchy for the set of methods that compose
a protocol. This attribute will cause the compiler to not consider
the methods contributed by a super class, its categories, and those
from its ancestor classes. Thus this attribute is used to force
subclasses to redeclare (and hopefully re-implement) methods if
they decide to explicitly conform to a protocol where some of those
methods may be provided by a super class.
This attribute intentionally leaves out properties, which are associated
with state. This attribute only considers methods (at least right now)
that are non-property accessors. These represent methods that "do something"
as dictated by the protocol. This may be further refined, and this
should be considered a WIP until documentation gets written or this
gets removed.
llvm-svn: 195533
This enables a micro-optimization in protocol conformance checking
to not examine the class hierarchy twice per method.
As part of this change, remove the default arguments from lookupInstanceMethod()
and lookupClassMethod(). It was becoming very redundant. For clients
needing the default arguments, have them use the full API instead of
these convenience methods.
llvm-svn: 195532
attribute on method declaration and implementation
match. This makes no sense. Most annotations are
meant for declarations only and one is for implementation.
This has been constant source of regresions and hackery to
get around special cases. I am removing this check.
Such checks must be done on a case by case basis and
when it makes sense. For example, it makes sense
for availability/deprecated and I will file a radar
for that. // rdar://15531984
llvm-svn: 195524
After implementing this patch, a few concerns about the language
feature itself emerged in my head that I had previously not considered.
I want to resolve those design concerns first before having
a half-designed language feature in the tree.
llvm-svn: 195328
The idea is to allow a class to stipulate that its methods (and those
of its parents) cannot be used for protocol conformance in a subclass.
A subclass is then explicitly required to re-implement those methods
of they are present in the class marked with this attribute.
Currently the attribute can only be applied to an @interface, and
not a category or class extension. This is by design. Unlike
protocol conformance, where a category can add explicit conformance
of a protocol to class, this anti-conformance really needs to be
observed uniformly by all clients of the class. That's because
the absence of the attribute implies more permissive checking of
protocol conformance.
This unfortunately required changing method lookup in ObjCInterfaceDecl
to take an optional protocol parameter. This should not slow down
method lookup in most cases, and is just used for protocol conformance.
llvm-svn: 195323
declared in a typedef declaraton used as super
class of an ObjC class. Curretnly, these protocols
are dropped from the class hierarchy. Test shows that
it is now included. // rdar://15051465
llvm-svn: 191395
- Some documenation were added.
- Usages of OpaquePtr<A>.getAsVal<A>() were replaced by OpaquePtr<A>.get().
- Methods getAs and getAsVal were renamed to getPtrTo and getPtrAs respectively.
llvm-svn: 189346
properties (direct or indirect) setter/getter (or declared
methods as well) are seen by the method implementation type
matching logic before declaration of method in super class
is seen. This fixes the warning coming out of that method mismatch.
// rdar://14650159
llvm-svn: 188438
method declaration into its implementation to
prevent a bogus warning about mismatched attributes.
then make sure the warning about missing call to super comes out
of the method implementation. // rdar://14251387
llvm-svn: 185974
As an optimization, we only kept declared methods with distinct
signatures in the global method pool, to keep the method lists
small. Under modules, however, one could have two different methods
with the same signature that occur in different (sub)modules. If only
the later submodule is important, message sends to 'id' with that
selector would fail because the first method (the only one that got
into the method pool) was hidden. When building a module, keep *all*
of the declared methods.
I did a quick check of both module build time and uses of modules, and
found no performance regression despite this causing us to keep more
methods in the global method pool. Fixes <rdar://problem/14148896>.
llvm-svn: 184504
If we have something like
@class NewImage;
@compatibility_alias OldImage NewImage;
@class OldImage;
the lookup for 'OldImage' will return the 'NewImage' decl ("@class NewImage").
In such a case, when creating the decl for "@class OldImage" use the real declaration name ("NewImage"),
instead of the alias one ("OldImage"), otherwise we will break IdentifierResolver and redecls-chain invariants.
Fixes crash of rdar://14112291.
llvm-svn: 184238
in addition of receiver having static type, but also when
receiver has dynamic type (of 'id' variety) as well as when
receiver is of 'Class' type vareity. // rdar://7853549
llvm-svn: 184195
Check for invalid decls in ObjCMethodDecl::getNextRedeclaration(); otherwise if we start from an invalid redeclaration
of an @implementation we would move to the @interface and not reach the original declaration again.
Fixes rdar://14024851
llvm-svn: 182951
The most common (non-buggy) case are where such objects are used as
return expressions in bool-returning functions or as boolean function
arguments. In those cases I've used (& added if necessary) a named
function to provide the equivalent (or sometimes negative, depending on
convenient wording) test.
DiagnosticBuilder kept its implicit conversion operator owing to the
prevalent use of it in return statements.
One bug was found in ExprConstant.cpp involving a comparison of two
PointerUnions (PointerUnion did not previously have an operator==, so
instead both operands were converted to bool & then compared). A test
is included in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp for the fix
(adding operator== to PointerUnion in LLVM).
llvm-svn: 181869
recovery form duplicate method definition error thus
preventing doc parsing to loop trying to find comment
for the invalid redefinition in a previous declaration.
// rdar://13836387
llvm-svn: 181710
categories, do not report when they are declared in primary class,
class's protocol, or one of it super classes. This is because,
its class is going to implement them. // rdar://13713098
llvm-svn: 180198
When we are in a implementation, we check the global method pool whether there were category
methods with the same selector. If there were none (common case) we don't need to do lookups for
overridden methods again.
Note that for an interface method (if we don't encounter its implementation), it is considered that
it overrides methods that were declared before it, not for category methods introduced after it.
This is tradeoff in favor of performance, since it is expensive to do lookups in case there was a
category, and moving the global method pool to ASTContext (so we can check it) would increase complexity.
rdar://13508196
llvm-svn: 179654
This is done by extending ObjCMethodList (which is only used by the global method pool) to have 2 extra bits of information.
We will later take advantage of this info in global method pool for the overridden methods calculation.
llvm-svn: 179652
when result type of protocol property and getter method
differ by fixing a more serious problem. When a forward
protocol declaration comes between its definition and
its use in class protocol list, the forward protocol
ast was being used in building the protocol list.
// rdar://12522752
llvm-svn: 179108
of a property just in case the property's getter happens to be +1.
We won't synthesize a getter for such a property, but we will allow
the user to define a +1 method for it.
rdar://13115896
llvm-svn: 178731
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
When using modules we should not ignore overridden methods from
categories that are hidden because the module is not visible.
This will give more consistent results (when imports change) and it's more
correct since the methods are indeed overridden even if they are not "visible"
for lookup purposes.
rdar://13350796
llvm-svn: 178374
Previously all unimplemented methods for a class were grouped under
a single warning, with all the unimplemented methods mentioned
as notes. Based on feedback from users, most users would like
a separate warning for each method, with a note pointing back to
the original method declaration.
Implements <rdar://problem/13350414>
llvm-svn: 178097
lexical declarations looking for properties when we could more
efficiently check for property mismatches at property declaration
time. Good for ~1% of -fsyntax-only time when most of the properties
we're checking against come from an AST file.
llvm-svn: 173079
did a redundant traversal of the lexical declarations in the
superclass. Instead, when we declare a new property, look into the
superclass to see whether we're redeclaring the property. Goot for 1%
of -fsyntax-only time on Cocoa.h and a little less than 3% on my
modules test case.
llvm-svn: 173073
consider (sub)module visibility.
The bulk of this change replaces myriad hand-rolled loops over the
linked list of Objective-C categories/extensions attached to an
interface declaration with loops using one of the four new category
iterator kinds:
visible_categories_iterator: Iterates over all visible categories
and extensions, hiding any that have their "hidden" bit set. This is
by far the most commonly used iterator.
known_categories_iterator: Iterates over all categories and
extensions, ignoring the "hidden" bit. This tends to be used for
redeclaration-like traversals.
visible_extensions_iterator: Iterates over all visible extensions,
hiding any that have their "hidden" bit set.
known_extensions_iterator: Iterates over all extensions, whether
they are visible to normal name lookup or not.
The effect of this change is that any uses of the visible_ iterators
will respect module-import visibility. See the new tests for examples.
Note that the old accessors for categories and extensions are gone;
there are *Raw() forms for some of them, for those (few) areas of the
compiler that have to manipulate the linked list of categories
directly. This is generally discouraged.
Part two of <rdar://problem/10634711>.
llvm-svn: 172665
overriding and overridden method, allow the overridden method to have
a narrower contract (introduced earlier, deprecated/obsoleted later)
than the overriding method. Fixes <rdar://problem/12992023>.
llvm-svn: 172567
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
Also, unify ObjCShouldCallSuperDealloc and ObjCShouldCallSuperFinalize.
The two have identical behavior and will never be active at the same time.
There's one last simplification now, which is that if we see a call to
[super foo] and we are currently in a method named 'foo', we will
/unconditionally/ clear the ObjCShouldCallSuper flag, rather than check
first to see if we're in a method where calling super is required. There's
no reason to pay the extra lookup price here.
llvm-svn: 166285
This more accurately reflects its use: this flag is set when a method
matches the getter or setter name for a property in the same class,
and does not actually specify whether or not the definition of the method
will be synthesized (either implicitly or explicitly with @synthesize).
This renames the setter and backing field as well, and changes the
(soon-to-be-obsolete?) XML dump format to use 'property_accessor'
instead of 'synthesized'.
llvm-svn: 165626
in classes. Use it to flag those method implementations which don't
contain call to 'super' if they have 'super' class and it has the method
with this attribute set. This is wip. // rdar://6386358
llvm-svn: 163434
type of generated call to super dealloc is 'void'
and asserts if user's dealloc is not of 'void type.
This rule must be enforced in clang front-end (with a
fixit) if this is not the case, instead of asserting in CodeGen.
// rdar://11987838
llvm-svn: 160993
diagnostics implemented -- see testcases.
I created a new TableGen file for comment diagnostics,
DiagnosticCommentKinds.td, because comment diagnostics don't logically
fit into AST diagnostics file. But I don't feel strongly about it.
This also implements support for self-closing HTML tags in comment
lexer and parser (for example, <br />).
In order to issue precise diagnostics CommentSema needs to know the
declaration the comment is attached to. There is no easy way to find a decl by
comment, so we match comments and decls in lockstep: after parsing one
declgroup we check if we have any new, not yet attached comments. If we do --
then we do the usual comment-finding process.
It is interesting that this automatically handles trailing comments.
We pick up not only comments that precede the declaration, but also
comments that *follow* the declaration -- thanks to the lookahead in
the lexer: after parsing the declgroup we've consumed the semicolon
and looked ahead through comments.
Added -Wdocumentation-html flag for semantic HTML errors to allow the user to
disable only HTML warnings (but not HTML parse errors, which we emit as
warnings in -Wdocumentation).
llvm-svn: 160078
initializer.
I really feel like Clang should warn about this, but I can't describe
a good reason. GCC will warn on this in some cases under
-Wsequence-point, but it actually seems like a false positive for that
warning....
llvm-svn: 159631
c-functions declared in implementation should have their
parsing delayed until the end so, they can access forward
declared private methods. // rdar://10387088
llvm-svn: 159626
target Objective-C runtime down to the frontend: break this
down into a single target runtime kind and version, and compute
all the relevant information from that. This makes it
relatively painless to add support for new runtimes to the
compiler. Make the new -cc1 flag, -fobjc-runtime=blah-x.y.z,
available at the driver level as a better and more general
alternative to -fgnu-runtime and -fnext-runtime. This new
concept of an Objective-C runtime also encompasses what we
were previously separating out as the "Objective-C ABI", so
fragile vs. non-fragile runtimes are now really modelled as
different kinds of runtime, paving the way for better overall
differentiation.
As a sort of special case, continue to accept the -cc1 flag
-fobjc-runtime-has-weak, as a sop to PLCompatibilityWeak.
I won't go so far as to say "no functionality change", even
ignoring the new driver flag, but subtle changes in driver
semantics are almost certainly not intended.
llvm-svn: 158793
* Escape #, < and @ symbols where Doxygen would try to interpret them;
* Fix several function param documentation where names had got out of sync;
* Delete param documentation referring to parameters that no longer exist.
llvm-svn: 158472
In addition, I've made the pointer and reference typedef 'void' rather than T*
just so they can't get misused. I would've omitted them entirely but
std::distance likes them to be there even if it doesn't use them.
This rolls back r155808 and r155869.
Review by Doug Gregor incorporating feedback from Chandler Carruth.
llvm-svn: 158104
that the methods have the same number of parameters, although we
certainly assumed this in many places. Objective-C can be insane
sometimes. Fixes <rdar://problem/11460990>.
llvm-svn: 157025
Argyrios Kyrtzidis