Summary:
This removes DeclVendor's dependency on clang (and ClangASTContext).
DeclVendor has no need to know about specific TypeSystems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66628
llvm-svn: 369735
This patch is also motivated by the Swift branch and is effectively NFC for the single-TypeSystem llvm.org branch.
In multi-language projects it is extremely common to have, e.g., a
Clang type and a similarly-named rendition of that same type in
another language. When searching for a type It is much cheaper to pass
a set of supported languages to the SymbolFile than having it
materialize every result and then rejecting the materialized types
that have the wrong language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66546
<rdar://problem/54471165>
This reapplies r369690 with a previously missing constructor for LanguageSet.
llvm-svn: 369710
It looks like running without this argument was supported
for legacy reasons, but a Xcode 11 beta made the argument
mandatory for our usecase.
llvm-svn: 369709
This patch is also motivated by the Swift branch and is effectively NFC for the single-TypeSystem llvm.org branch.
In multi-language projects it is extremely common to have, e.g., a
Clang type and a similarly-named rendition of that same type in
another language. When searching for a type It is much cheaper to pass
a set of supported languages to the SymbolFile than having it
materialize every result and then rejecting the materialized types
that have the wrong language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66546
<rdar://problem/54471165>
llvm-svn: 369690
The evaluation context isn't guaranteed to have this declaration.
Fixes "error: use of undeclared identifier 'malloc_get_all_zones'" bugs.
llvm-svn: 369684
Since D66174 I see failures of TestDataFormatterStdList in about 50% of runs on
Fedora 30 x86_64 libstdc++. I have found out that LLDB internally expects these
RegularExpressions to be matched in their alphabetical order:
^std::(__cxx11::)?list<.+>(( )?&)?$
^std::__[[:alnum:]]+::list<.+>(( )?&)?$
But since D66174 they are sometimes matched in reverse order. In fact it was
only some luck it worked before as there is internally
std::map<lldb::RegularExpressionSP, FormatterImpl> (FormattersContainer).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66398
llvm-svn: 369655
Summary:
We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but
all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`.
The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option
(which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove
the `default` cases).
This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code
that can't be reached.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522
llvm-svn: 369625
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
Summary:
The former seems like it's not working on some platforms.
All the other uses use `llvm::`, so, let's change for consistency.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, friss
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66566
llvm-svn: 369618
This adds a static assert that ensures that there's a format info entry
for every format enum value. This should prevent others from making the
same mistake I made and Jason kindly fixed in r369611. (Thanks!)
llvm-svn: 369614
enum Format entries; else we can crash in a place like
FormatManager::GetFormatAsCString(). We should add bounds checks
to prevent this more reliably, but for tonight I'm just adding this
entry to keep an address-sanitizer test run working.
llvm-svn: 369611
This patch generalizes the FindTypes with CompilerContext interface to
support looking up a type of unknown kind by name, as well as looking
up a type inside an unspecified submodule. These features are
motivated by the Swift branch, but are fully tested via unit tests and
lldb-test on llvm.org. Specifically, this patch adds an AnyModule and
an AnyType CompilerContext kind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66507
rdar://problem/54471165
llvm-svn: 369555
This recommits r368416, which was reverted in r368838 because of test
failures under ASAN. These have been dealt with by llvm r369370.
The original commit message was:
When opening a minidump, we were failing to find an executable because
we were searching for i386-unknown-windows, whereas we recognize the
pe/coff files as i386-pc-windows. This fixes the triple computation code
in the minidump parser to match pe/coff, and adds an appropriate test.
NB: I'm not sure setting the vendor to "pc" is really correct for
arm(64) windows, but right now that seems to match what we do in the
pe/coff case (ArchSpec.cpp:935).
Reviewers: clayborg, amccarth
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, rnk, markmentovai, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65955
llvm-svn: 369523
The EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL variable is used by add_llvm_library, but lldb does
not use that function (it uses llvm_add_library :P). Instead, set the directory
property with the same name directly.
This should fix standalone builds against an llvm install tree.
llvm-svn: 369502
This patch removes the two variant of StringExtractor::GetStringRef that
return (non-)const references to std::string. The non-const one was
being abused to reinitialize the StringExtractor and its uses are
replaced by calls to the copy asignment operator. The const variant was
refactored to return an actual llvm::StringRef.
llvm-svn: 369493
The implementation of this function was obviously incorrect, as the
result variable was never used. This led me to check if it was actually
used anywhere, which came back negative.
llvm-svn: 369492
While generating the Doxygen I noticed this lone namespace that has one
class and one function in it. This moves them into lldb_private.
llvm-svn: 369485
the platform in the setUp/tearDown methods. I want to migrate the
re-instatement of the correct plaform to the setUp base method but
haven't had time to look at that yet, so I want to land this handful
of fixes until I get to it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66331
llvm-svn: 369484
We cannot override the DWARF version in the CFLAGS_EXTRA because they
are used by tests that explicitly build without debug info. Instead, we
pass them through the regular CFLAGS.
llvm-svn: 369477
This patch fixes a bunch of -Wdocumentation warnings in Utility. I'm
sure there are still a bunch outdated comments left, but this fixes the
most flagrant inconsistencies that the compiler understands.
llvm-svn: 369461