gep to explicit addressing, we know that none of the intermediate
computation overflows.
This could use review: it seems that the shifts certainly wouldn't
overflow, but could the intermediate adds overflow if there is a
negative index?
Previously the testcase would instcombine to:
define i1 @test(i64 %i) {
%p1.idx.mask = and i64 %i, 4611686018427387903
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %p1.idx.mask, 1000
ret i1 %cmp
}
now we get:
define i1 @test(i64 %i) {
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %i, 1000
ret i1 %cmp
}
llvm-svn: 125271
to EmitGEPOffset.
Implement some new transforms for optimizing
subtracts of two pointer to ints into the same vector. This happens
for C++ iterator idioms for example, stringmap takes a const char*
that points to the start and end of a string. Once inlined, we want
the pointer difference to turn back into a length.
This is rdar://7362831.
llvm-svn: 86021
overflowed on negation. This commit checks to make sure that neithe C nor X
overflows. This requires that the RHS of X (a subtract instruction) be a
constant integer.
llvm-svn: 60275
Remove "target endian/pointersize" or add "target datalayout" to make
the test parse properly or set the datalayout because defaults changes.
For PR645:
Make global names use the @ prefix.
For llvm-upgrade changes:
Fix test cases or completely remove use of llvm-upgrade for test cases
that cannot survive the new renaming or upgrade capabilities.
llvm-svn: 33533
Chris Lattner