If we have a dependence between an abstract attribute A to an abstract
attribute B such hat changes in A should trigger an update of B, we do
not need to keep the dependence around once the update was triggered. If
the dependence is still required the update will reinsert it into the
dependence map, if it is not we avoid triggering B in the future. This
replaces the "recompute interval" mechanism we used before to prune
stale dependences.
Number of required iterations is generally down, compile time for the
module pass (not really the CGSCC pass) is down quite a bit.
There is one test change which looks like an artifact in the undefined
behavior AA that needs to be looked at.
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
When the Attributor was created the test update scripts were not well
suited to deal with the challenges of IR attribute checking. This
partially improved.
Since then we also added three additional configurations that need
testing; in total we now have the following four:
{ TUNIT, CGSCC } x { old pass manager (OPM), new pass manager (NPM) }
Finally, the number of developers and tests grew rapidly (partially due
to the addition of ArgumentPromotion and IPConstantProp tests), which
resulted in tests only being run in some configurations, different
prefixes being used, and different "styles" of checks being used.
Due to the above reasons I believed we needed to take another look at
the test update scripts. While we started to use them, via UTC_ARGS:
--enable/disable, the other problems remained. To improve the testing
situation for *all* configurations, to simplify future updates to the
test, and to help identify subtle effects of future changes, we now use
the test update scripts for (almost) all Attributor tests.
An exhaustive prefix list minimizes the number of check lines and makes
it easy to identify and compare configurations.
Tests have been adjusted in the process but we tried to keep their
intend unchanged.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76588
There was a TODO in genericValueTraversal to provide the context
instruction and due to the lack of it users that wanted one just used
something available. Unfortunately, using a fixed instruction is wrong
in the presence of PHIs so we need to update the context instruction
properly.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76870
Use DL & ABI information for better alignment deduction, e.g., if a type
is accessed and the ABI specifies an alignment requirement for such an
access we can use it. This is based on a patch by @lebedev.ri and
inspired by getBaseAlign in Loads.cpp.
Depends on D76673.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76674
Currently ConstantRange::binaryAnd/binaryOr results are too pessimistic
for single element constant ranges.
If both operands are single element ranges, we can use APInt's AND and
OR implementations directly.
Note that some other binary operations on constant ranges can cover the
single element cases naturally, but for OR and AND this unfortunately is
not the case.
Reviewers: nikic, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76446
We usually will ask for liveness of an argument anyway so we ended up
lazily creating the attribute anyway. However, that is not always the
case and even if it is we should go the eager route here. Various tests
show how this can improve the outcome. One test exposed a problem with
type mismatches between argument and call site argument, a fix is
included. For liveness various more tests were added as well.
In addition to memory behavior attributes (readonly/writeonly) we now
derive memory location attributes (argmemonly/inaccessiblememonly/...).
The former is part of AAMemoryBehavior and the latter part of
AAMemoryLocation. While they are similar in nature it got messy when
they were put in a single AA. Location attributes for arguments and
floating values will follow later.
Note that both memory attributes kinds can derive readnone. If there are
no accesses AAMemoryBehavior will derive readnone. If there are accesses
but only to stack (=local) locations AAMemoryLocation will derive
readnone.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73426
Due to the genericValueTraversal we might visit values for which we did
not create an AAValueConstantRange object, e.g., as they are behind a
PHI or select or call with `returned` argument. As a consequence we need
to validate the types as we are about to query AAValueConstantRange for
operands.
We used coarse-grained liveness before, thus we looked if the
instruction was executed, but we did not use fine-grained liveness,
hence if the instruction was needed or could be deleted even if the
surrounding ones are live. This patches introduces this level of
liveness checks together with other liveness queries, e.g., for uses.
For more control we enforce that all liveness queries go through the
Attributor.
Test have been adjusted to reflect the changes or augmented to prevent
deletion of the parts we want to check.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73313
The changeXXXAfterManifest functions are better suited to deal with
changes so we should prefer them. These functions also recursively
delete dead instructions which is why we see test changes.
Traversing PHI nodes is natural with the genericValueTraversal but also
a bit tricky. The problem is similar to the ones we have seen in AAAlign
and AADereferenceable, namely that we continue to increase the range in
each iteration. We use a pessimistic approach here to stop the
iterations. Nevertheless, optimistic information can now be propagated
through a PHI node.
Casts can be handled natively by the ConstantRange class. We do limit it
to extends for now as we assume an integer type in different locations.
A TODO and a test case with a FIXME was added to remove that restriction
in the future.
If we invalidate an attribute we need to inform all dependent ones even
if the fixpoint state is not invalid. Before we only continued
invalidation if the fixpoint state was invalid, now we signal a change
in case the fixpoint state is valid.
The test case was already included in D71620 but the problem was hiding
because it only manifested with the old PM (for that input).
Summary:
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created in `getAssumedConstant` method when `AAValueSimplify` returns `nullptr`(worst state).
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: phosek, davezarzycki, baziotis, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created when AAValueSimplify cannot
simplify the value.
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
Johannes Doerfert