Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith be7ea19b58 IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly.  These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

  - Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
    intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.

  - Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
    when referencing it from call intrinsics.

So, assembly like this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
    !1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
    !2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
    !3 = metadata !{}

turns into this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = !{!2}
    !1 = !{i32* @global}
    !2 = !{!3}
    !3 = !{}

I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines).  I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.

This is part of PR21532.

llvm-svn: 224257
2014-12-15 19:07:53 +00:00
Shuxin Yang 3168ab3376 Fix PR17952.
The symptom is that an assertion is triggered. The assertion was added by
me to detect the situation when value is propagated from dead blocks.
(We can certainly get rid of assertion; it is safe to do so, because propagating
 value from dead block to alive join node is certainly ok.)

  The root cause of this bug is : edge-splitting is conducted on the fly,
the edge being split could be a dead edge, therefore the block that 
split the critial edge needs to be flagged "dead" as well.

  There are 3 ways to fix this bug:
  1) Get rid of the assertion as I mentioned eariler 
  2) When an dead edge is split, flag the inserted block "dead".
  3) proactively split the critical edges connecting dead and live blocks when
     new dead blocks are revealed.

  This fix go for 3) with additional 2 LOC.

  Testing case was added by Rafael the other day.

llvm-svn: 194424
2013-11-11 22:00:23 +00:00
Bill Wendling fed6c220ec Revert "Resurrect r191017 " GVN proceeds in the presence of dead code" plus a fix to PR17307 & 17308."
This causes PR17852.

This reverts commit d93e8a06b2ca09ab18f390cd514b7443e2e571f7.

Conflicts:
	test/Transforms/GVN/cond_br2.ll

llvm-svn: 194348
2013-11-10 07:34:34 +00:00
Manman Ren adf4cc171e TBAA: update tbaa format from scalar format to struct-path aware format.
llvm-svn: 191690
2013-09-30 18:17:55 +00:00
Shuxin Yang 6e35094bbf Resurrect r191017 " GVN proceeds in the presence of dead code" plus a fix to PR17307 & 17308.
The problem of r191017 is that when GVN fabricate a val-number for a dead instruction (in order
to make following expr-PRE happy), it forget to fabricate a leader-table entry for it as well.

llvm-svn: 191118
2013-09-20 23:12:57 +00:00
Joerg Sonnenberger cf90a12170 Delete empty files.
llvm-svn: 191105
2013-09-20 20:40:22 +00:00
Joerg Sonnenberger 1fbe323649 Revert r191017, it results in segmentation faults in Qt.
llvm-svn: 191104
2013-09-20 20:33:57 +00:00
Shuxin Yang 74c9a170b8 GVN proceeds in the presence of dead code.
This is how it ignores the dead code:
1) When a dead branch target, say block B, is identified, all the
    blocks dominated by B is dead as well.

2) The PHIs of those blocks in dominance-frontier(B) is updated such
   that the operands corresponding to dead predecessors are replaced
   by "UndefVal".

   Using lattice's jargon, the "UndefVal" is the "Top" in essence.
   Phi node like this "phi(v1 bb1, undef xx)" will be optimized into
   "v1" if v1 is constant, or v1 is an instruction which dominate this
   PHI node.

3) When analyzing the availability of a load L, all dead mem-ops which
   L depends on disguise as a load which evaluate exactly same value as L.

4) The dead mem-ops will be materialized as "UndefVal" during code motion.

llvm-svn: 191017
2013-09-19 17:22:51 +00:00