As a prerequisite to time-passes implementation which needs to time both passes
and analyses, adding instrumentation points to the Analysis Manager.
The are two functional differences between Pass and Analysis instrumentation:
- the latter does not increment pass execution counter
- it does not provide ability to skip execution of the corresponding analysis
Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51275
llvm-svn: 342778
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@
The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.
Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
and access to them.
* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
(adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.
* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).
* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.
* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
RepeatedPass::run.
TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.
* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run
* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.
Made getName helper to return std::string (instead of StringRef initially) to fix
asan builtbot failures on CGSCC tests.
Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858
llvm-svn: 342664
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@
The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.
Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
and access to them.
* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
(adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.
* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).
* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.
* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
RepeatedPass::run.
TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.
* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run
* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.
Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858
llvm-svn: 342597
Summary:
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@
The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.
Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
and access to them.
* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
(adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.
* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).
* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.
* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
RepeatedPass::run.
TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.
* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run
* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.
Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858
llvm-svn: 342544
This was one of the potential follow-ups suggested in D48236,
and these will be used to make matching the patterns in PR38691 cleaner:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38691
About the vocabulary: in the DAG, these would be concat_vector with an
undef operand or extract_subvector. Alternate names are discussed in the
review, but I think these are familiar/good enough to proceed. Once we
have uses of them in code, we might adjust if there are better options.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51392
llvm-svn: 341075
The function's new implementation from r340583 had a bug in it that
could cause an invalid scope to be generated when merging two
DILocations with no common ancestor scope.
This patch detects this situation and picks the scope of the first
location. This is not perfect, because the scope is misleading, but on
the other hand, this will be a line 0 location.
rdar://problem/43687474
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51238
llvm-svn: 340672
In cases where the debugger load time is a worthwhile tradeoff (or less
costly - such as loading from a DWP instead of a variety of DWOs
(possibly over a high-latency/distributed filesystem)) against object
file size, it can be reasonable to disable pubnames and corresponding
gdb-index creation in the linker.
A backend-flag version of this was implemented for NVPTX in
D44385/r327994 - which was fine for NVPTX which wouldn't mix-and-match
CUs. Now that it's going to be a user-facing option (likely powered by
"-gno-pubnames", the same as GCC) it should be encoded in the
DICompileUnit so it can vary per-CU.
After this, likely the NVPTX support should be migrated to the metadata
& the previous flag implementation should be removed.
Reviewers: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50213
llvm-svn: 339939
Flags in DIBasicType will be used to pass attributes used in
DW_TAG_base_type, such as DW_AT_endianity.
Patch by Chirag Patel!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49610
llvm-svn: 339714
Summary:
Clean-up following D50479.
Make Update and LegalizeUpdate refer to the utilities in Support/CFGUpdate.
Reviewers: kuhar
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, mgrang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50669
llvm-svn: 339694
Summary: After converting all existing passes to use the new DomTreeUpdater interface, there isn't any usage of the original DeferredDominance class. Thus, we can safely remove it from the codebase.
Reviewers: kuhar, brzycki, dmgreen, davide, grosser
Reviewed By: kuhar, brzycki
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49747
llvm-svn: 339502
Summary:
This patch refines the logic of `recalculate()` in the `DomTreeUpdater` in the following two aspects:
1. Previously, `recalculate()` tests whether there are pending updates/BBs awaiting deletion and then do recalculation under Lazy UpdateStrategy; and do recalculation immediately under Eager UpdateStrategy. (The former behavior is inherited from the `DeferredDominance` class). This is an inconsistency between two strategies and there is no obvious reason to do this. So the behavior is changed to always recalculate available trees when calling `recalculate()`.
2. Fix the issue of when DTU under Lazy UpdateStrategy holds nothing but with BBs awaiting deletion, after calling `recalculate()`, BBs awaiting deletion aren't flushed. An additional unittest is added to cover this case.
Reviewers: kuhar, dmgreen, brzycki, grosser, davide
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50173
llvm-svn: 338822
LowerDbgDeclare inserts a dbg.value before each use of an address
described by a dbg.declare. When inserting a dbg.value before a CallInst
use, however, it fails to append DW_OP_deref to the DIExpression.
The DW_OP_deref is needed to reflect the fact that a dbg.value describes
a source variable directly (as opposed to a dbg.declare, which relies on
pointer indirection).
This patch adds in the DW_OP_deref where needed. This results in the
correct values being shown during a debug session for a program compiled
with ASan and optimizations (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D49520). Note
that ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue is already correct -- no changes
there were needed.
One complication is that SelectionDAG is unable to distinguish between
direct and indirect frame-index (FRAMEIX) SDDbgValues. This patch also
fixes this long-standing issue in order to not regress integration tests
relying on the incorrect assumption that all frame-index SDDbgValues are
indirect. This is a necessary fix: the newly-added DW_OP_derefs cannot
be lowered properly otherwise. Basically the fix prevents a direct
SDDbgValue with DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) from being dereferenced twice
by a debugger. There were a handful of tests relying on this incorrect
"FRAMEIX => indirect" assumption which actually had incorrect
DW_AT_locations: these are all fixed up in this patch.
Testing:
- check-llvm, and an end-to-end test using lldb to debug an optimized
program.
- Existing unit tests for DIExpression::appendToStack fully cover the
new DIExpression::append utility.
- check-debuginfo (the debug info integration tests)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49454
llvm-svn: 338069
Summary:
Previously, when both DT and PDT are nullptrs and the UpdateStrategy is Lazy, DomTreeUpdater still pends updates inside.
After this patch, DomTreeUpdater will ignore all updates from(`applyUpdates()/insertEdge*()/deleteEdge*()`) in this case. (call `delBB()` still pends BasicBlock deletion until a flush event according to the doc).
The behavior of DomTreeUpdater previously documented won't change after the patch.
Reviewers: dmgreen, davide, kuhar, brzycki, grosser
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48974
llvm-svn: 336968
Summary:
Previously, when people need to deal with DTU with different UpdateStrategy using different actions, they need to
```
if (DTU.getUpdateStrategy() == DomTreeUpdater::UpdateStrategy::Lazy) {
...
}
if (DTU.getUpdateStrategy() == DomTreeUpdater::UpdateStrategy::Eager) {
...
}
```
After the patch, they can avoid code patterns above
```
if (DTU.isUpdateLazy()){
...
}
if (!DTU.isUpdateLazy()){
...
}
```
Reviewers: kuhar, brzycki, dmgreen
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49056
llvm-svn: 336886
Summary:
This patch is the first in a series of patches related to the [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123883.html | RFC - A new dominator tree updater for LLVM ]].
This patch introduces the DomTreeUpdater class, which provides a cleaner API to perform updates on available dominator trees (none, only DomTree, only PostDomTree, both) using different update strategies (eagerly or lazily) to simplify the updating process.
—Prior to the patch—
- Directly calling update functions of DominatorTree updates the data structure eagerly while DeferredDominance does updates lazily.
- DeferredDominance class cannot be used when a PostDominatorTree also needs to be updated.
- Functions receiving DT/DDT need to branch a lot which is currently necessary.
- Functions using both DomTree and PostDomTree need to call the update function separately on both trees.
- People need to construct an additional DeferredDominance class to use functions only receiving DDT.
—After the patch—
Patch by Chijun Sima <simachijun@gmail.com>.
Reviewers: kuhar, brzycki, dmgreen, grosser, davide
Reviewed By: kuhar, brzycki
Author: NutshellySima
Subscribers: vsk, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48383
llvm-svn: 336163
Summary:
This patch is the first in a series of patches related to the [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123883.html | RFC - A new dominator tree updater for LLVM ]].
This patch introduces the DomTreeUpdater class, which provides a cleaner API to perform updates on available dominator trees (none, only DomTree, only PostDomTree, both) using different update strategies (eagerly or lazily) to simplify the updating process.
—Prior to the patch—
- Directly calling update functions of DominatorTree updates the data structure eagerly while DeferredDominance does updates lazily.
- DeferredDominance class cannot be used when a PostDominatorTree also needs to be updated.
- Functions receiving DT/DDT need to branch a lot which is currently necessary.
- Functions using both DomTree and PostDomTree need to call the update function separately on both trees.
- People need to construct an additional DeferredDominance class to use functions only receiving DDT.
—After the patch—
Patch by Chijun Sima <simachijun@gmail.com>.
Reviewers: kuhar, brzycki, dmgreen, grosser, davide
Reviewed By: kuhar, brzycki
Subscribers: vsk, mgorny, llvm-commits
Author: NutshellySima
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48383
llvm-svn: 336114
This addresses post-commit feedback about the name 'skipDebugInfo' being
misleading. This name could be interpreted as meaning 'a function that
skips instructions with debug locations'.
The new name, 'skipDebugIntrinsics', makes it clear that this function
only skips debug info intrinsics.
Thanks to Adrian Prantl for pointing this out!
llvm-svn: 335667
Summary: This is trying to add support for r334428.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: jlebar, hiraditya, bixia, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48399
llvm-svn: 335646
This patch introduces two helpers to make it easier to ignore debug
intrinsics:
- Instruction::getNextNonDebugInstruction()
This is just like Instruction::getNextNode(), except that it skips debug
info.
- skipDebugInfo(BasicBlock::iterator)
A free function which advances a BasicBlock iterator past any debug
info. This is a no-op when the iterator already points to a non-debug
instruction.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37728
Related to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47874
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48305
llvm-svn: 335083
The optimizer is getting smarter (eg, D47986) about differentiating shuffles
based on its mask values, so we should make queries on the mask constant
operand generally available to avoid code duplication.
We'll probably use this soon in the vectorizers and instcombine (D48023 and
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37806).
We might clean up TTI a bit more once all of its current 'SK_*' options are
covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48236
llvm-svn: 335067
DominatorTreeBase::getNode does not modify its parameter and this change
allows callers that only have access to const pointers to use it without
casting.
Reviewers: kuhar, dblaikie, chandlerc
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48231
llvm-svn: 334892
and using the latter in DIBuilder::createArtificialType and
DIBuilder::createObjectPointerType methods as well as introducing
mirroring DISubprogram::cloneWithFlags and
DIBuilder::createArtificialSubprogram methods.
The primary goal here is to add createArtificialSubprogram to support
a pass downstream while keeping the method consistent with the
existing ones and making sure we don't encourage changing already
created DI-nodes.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47615
llvm-svn: 333806
Summary: This patch adds a PDT constructor from Function and lets codes previously using a local class to do this use PostDominatorTree class directly.
Reviewers: davide, kuhar, grosser, dberlin
Reviewed By: kuhar
Author: NutshellySima
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46709
llvm-svn: 333102
r332057 introduced distance() for ranges. Based on post-commit feedback,
this renames distance() to size(). The new size() is also only enabled
when the operation is O(1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46976
llvm-svn: 332551
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Summary:
Currently the order of blocks returned by `IDF::calculate` can be
non-deterministic. This was discovered in several attempts to enable
SSAUpdaterBulk for JumpThreading (which led to miscompare in bootstrap between
stage 3 and stage4). Originally, the blocks were put into a priority queue with
a depth level as their key, and this patch adds a DFSIn number as a second key
to specify a deterministic order across blocks from one level.
The solution was suggested by Daniel Berlin.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46646
llvm-svn: 332167
Summary: Fix two typos which result in verifying wrong data structures (DT) instead of PDT in DominatorTreeBatchUpdatesTest.
Reviewers: davide, kuhar, grosser, dberlin
Reviewed By: davide, kuhar, dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46696
llvm-svn: 332086
This commit adds a wrapper for std::distance() which works with ranges.
As it would be a common case to write `distance(predecessors(BB))`, this
also introduces `pred_size()` and `succ_size()` helpers to make that
easier to write.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46668
llvm-svn: 332057
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Inspired by r331508, I did a grep and found these.
Mostly just change from dyn_cast to cast. Some cases also showed a dyn_cast result being converted to bool, so those I changed to isa.
llvm-svn: 331577
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
LLVM_ON_WIN32 is set exactly with MSVC and MinGW (but not Cygwin) in
HandleLLVMOptions.cmake, which is where _WIN32 defined too. Just use the
default macro instead of a reinvented one.
See thread "Replacing LLVM_ON_WIN32 with just _WIN32" on llvm-dev and cfe-dev.
No intended behavior change.
This moves over all uses of the macro, but doesn't remove the definition
of it in (llvm-)config.h yet.
llvm-svn: 331127
Summary:
Currently, we
1. match `LHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `RHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
If that does not match, we swap the `LHS` and `RHS` matchers:
1. match `RHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `LHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
This works ok.
But it complicates writing of commutative matchers, where one would like to match
(`m_Value()`) the value on one side, and use (`m_Specific()`) it on the other side.
This is additionally complicated by the fact that `m_Specific()` stores the `Value *`,
not `Value **`, so it won't work at all out of the box.
The last problem is trivially solved by adding a new `m_c_Specific()` that stores the
`Value **`, not `Value *`. I'm choosing to add a new matcher, not change the existing
one because i guess all the current users are ok with existing behavior,
and this additional pointer indirection may have performance drawbacks.
Also, i'm storing pointer, not reference, because for some mysterious-to-me reason
it did not work with the reference.
The first one appears trivial, too.
Currently, we
1. match `LHS` matcher to the `first` operand of binary operator,
2. and then match `RHS` matcher to the `second` operand of binary operator.
If that does not match, we swap the ~~`LHS` and `RHS` matchers~~ **operands**:
1. match ~~`RHS`~~ **`LHS`** matcher to the ~~`first`~~ **`second`** operand of binary operator,
2. and then match ~~`LHS`~~ **`RHS`** matcher to the ~~`second`~ **`first`** operand of binary operator.
Surprisingly, `$ ninja check-llvm` still passes with this.
But i expect the bots will disagree..
The motivational unittest is included.
I'd like to use this in D45664.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, arsenm, RKSimon
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: xbolva00, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45828
llvm-svn: 331085
This makes it possible to reverse a filtered range. For example, here's
a way to visit memory accesses in a BasicBlock in reverse order:
auto MemInsts = reverse(make_filter_range(BB, [](Instruction &I) {
return isa<StoreInst>(&I) || isa<LoadInst>(&I);
}));
for (auto &MI : MemInsts)
...
To implement this functionality, I factored out forward iteration
functionality into filter_iterator_base, and added a specialization of
filter_iterator_impl which supports bidirectional iteration. Thanks to
Tim Shen, Zachary Turner, and others for suggesting this design and
providing feedback! This version of the patch supersedes the original
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D45792).
This was motivated by a problem we encountered in D45657: we'd like to
visit the non-debug-info instructions in a BasicBlock in reverse order.
Testing: check-llvm, check-clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45853
llvm-svn: 330875
The code uses the index of the last element in the sorted array to determine the maximum size needed for the vector. But if the last index is a FunctionIndex(~0), attrIdxToArrayIdx will return 0 and the vector will have size 1. If there are any indices before FunctionIndex, those values would return a value larger than 0 from attrIdxToArrayIdx. So in this case we need to look in front of the FunctionIndex to get the true size needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45632
llvm-svn: 330136
Matthew Voss