I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
I foresee two uses for this:
1) It's easier to use those in debugger.
2) Once we start implementing more VPlan-to-VPlan transformations (especially
inner loop massaging stuff), using the vectorized LLVM IR as CHECK targets in
LIT test would become too obscure. I can imagine that we'd want to CHECK
against VPlan dumps after multiple transformations instead. That would be
easier with plain text dumps than with DOT format.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96628
This reverts commit 6b053c9867.
The build is broken:
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::VPlan::printDOT(llvm::raw_ostream&) const
>>> referenced by LoopVectorize.cpp
>>> LoopVectorize.cpp.o:(llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::printPlans(llvm::raw_ostream&)) in archive lib/libLLVMVectorize.a
I foresee two uses for this:
1) It's easier to use those in debugger.
2) Once we start implementing more VPlan-to-VPlan transformations (especially
inner loop massaging stuff), using the vectorized LLVM IR as CHECK targets in
LIT test would become too obscure. I can imagine that we'd want to CHECK
against VPlan dumps after multiple transformations instead. That would be
easier with plain text dumps than with DOT format.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96628
BasicAA stores a reference to LoopInfo inside. This imposes an implicit
requirement of keeping it up to date whenever we modify the IR (in particular,
whenever we modify terminators of blocks that belong to loops). Failing
to do so leads to incorrect state of the LoopInfo.
Because general AA does not require loop info updates and provides to API to
update it properly, the users of AA reasonably assume that there is no need to
update the loop info. It may be a reason of bugs, as example in PR43276 shows.
This patch drops dependence of BasicAA on LoopInfo to avoid this problem.
This may potentially pessimize the result of queries to BasicAA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98627
Reviewed By: nikic
This reverts commit 329aeb5db4,
and relands commit 61f006ac65.
This is a continuation of D89456.
As it was suggested there, now that SCEV models `PtrToInt`,
we can try to improve SCEV's pointer handling.
In particular, i believe, i will need this in the future
to further fix `SCEVAddExpr`operation type handling.
This removes special handling of `ConstantPointerNull`
from `ScalarEvolution::createSCEV()`, and add constant folding
into `ScalarEvolution::getPtrToIntExpr()`.
This way, `null` constants stay as such in SCEV's,
but gracefully become zero integers when asked.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98147
This is a continuation of D89456.
As it was suggested there, now that SCEV models `PtrToInt`,
we can try to improve SCEV's pointer handling.
In particular, i believe, i will need this in the future
to further fix `SCEVAddExpr`operation type handling.
This removes special handling of `ConstantPointerNull`
from `ScalarEvolution::createSCEV()`, and add constant folding
into `ScalarEvolution::getPtrToIntExpr()`.
This way, `null` constants stay as such in SCEV's,
but gracefully become zero integers when asked.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98147
This patch makes uses of the context bridges introduced in D83299 to make
AAValueConstantRange call site specific.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83744
Add support to widen select instructions in VPlan native path by using a correct recipe when such instructions are encountered. This is already used by inner loop vectorizer.
Previously select instructions get handled by the wrong recipe and resulted in unreachable instruction errors like this one: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48139.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97136
Changes to function calls in LocalTest resulted in comparisons between
unsigned values and signed literals; the latter have been updated to be
unsigned to prevent this warning.
This patch updates DbgVariableIntrinsics to support use of a DIArgList for the
location operand, resulting in a significant change to its interface. This patch
does not update all IR passes to support multiple location operands in a
dbg.value; the only change is to update the DbgVariableIntrinsic interface and
its uses. All code outside of the intrinsic classes assumes that an intrinsic
will always have exactly one location operand; they will still support
DIArgLists, but only if they contain exactly one Value.
Among other changes, the setOperand and setArgOperand functions in
DbgVariableIntrinsic have been made private. This is to prevent code from
setting the operands of these intrinsics directly, which could easily result in
incorrect/invalid operands being set. This does not prevent these functions from
being called on a debug intrinsic at all, as they can still be called on any
CallInst pointer; it is assumed that any code directly setting the operands on a
generic call instruction is doing so safely. The intention for making these
functions private is to prevent DIArgLists from being overwritten by code that's
naively trying to replace one of the Values it points to, and also to fail fast
if a DbgVariableIntrinsic is updated to use a DIArgList without a valid
corresponding DIExpression.
As discussed on the RFC [0], I am sharing the set of patches that
enables checking of original Debug Info metadata preservation in
optimizations. The proof-of-concept/proposal can be found at [1].
The implementation from the [1] was full of duplicated code,
so this set of patches tries to merge this approach into the existing
debugify utility.
For example, the utility pass in the original-debuginfo-check
mode could be invoked as follows:
$ opt -verify-debuginfo-preserve -pass-to-test sample.ll
Since this is very initial stage of the implementation,
there is a space for improvements such as:
- Add support for the new pass manager
- Add support for metadata other than DILocations and DISubprograms
[0] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/llvm-dev/QOyF-38YPlE/G213uiuwCAAJ
[1] https://github.com/djolertrk/llvm-di-checker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82545
The test that was failing is now forced to use the old PM.
As discussed on the RFC [0], I am sharing the set of patches that
enables checking of original Debug Info metadata preservation in
optimizations. The proof-of-concept/proposal can be found at [1].
The implementation from the [1] was full of duplicated code,
so this set of patches tries to merge this approach into the existing
debugify utility.
For example, the utility pass in the original-debuginfo-check
mode could be invoked as follows:
$ opt -verify-debuginfo-preserve -pass-to-test sample.ll
Since this is very initial stage of the implementation,
there is a space for improvements such as:
- Add support for the new pass manager
- Add support for metadata other than DILocations and DISubprograms
[0] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/llvm-dev/QOyF-38YPlE/G213uiuwCAAJ
[1] https://github.com/djolertrk/llvm-di-checker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82545
This commit fixes how metadata is handled in CloneModule to be sound,
and improves how it's handled in CloneFunctionInto (although the latter
is still awkward when called within a module).
Ruiling Song pointed out in PR48841 that CloneModule was changed to
unsoundly use the RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs flag (renamed in
fa35c1f80f for clarity). This flag papered
over a crash caused by other various changes made to CloneFunctionInto
over the past few years that made it unsound to use cloning between
different modules.
(This commit partially addresses PR48841, fixing the repro from
preprocessed source but not textual IR. MDNodeMapper::mapDistinctNode
became unsound in df763188c9 and this
commit does not address that regression.)
RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs is designed for the IRMover to use,
avoiding unnecessary clones of all referenced metadata when linking
between modules (with IRMover, the source module is discarded after
linking). It never makes sense to use when you're not discarding the
source. This commit drops its incorrect use in CloneModule.
Sadly, the right thing to do with metadata when cloning a function is
complicated, and this patch doesn't totally fix it.
The first problem is that there are two different types of referenceable
metadata and it's not obvious what to with one of them when remapping.
- `!0 = !{!1}` is metadata's version of a constant. Programatically it's
called "uniqued" (probably a better term would be "constant") because,
like `ConstantArray`, it's stored in uniquing tables. Once it's
constructed, it's illegal to change its arguments.
- `!0 = distinct !{!1}` is a bit closer to a global variable. It's legal
to change the operands after construction.
What should be done with distinct metadata when cloning functions within
the same module?
- Should new, cloned nodes be created?
- Should all references point to the same, old nodes?
The answer depends on whether that metadata is effectively owned by a
function.
And that's the second problem. Referenceable metadata's ownership model
is not clear or explicit. Technically, it's all stored on an
LLVMContext. However, any metadata that is `distinct`, that transitively
references a `distinct` node, or that transitively references a
GlobalValue is specific to a Module and is effectively owned by it. More
specifically, some metadata is effectively owned by a specific Function
within a module.
Effectively function-local metadata was introduced somewhere around
c10d0e5ccd, which made it illegal for two
functions to share a DISubprogram attachment.
When cloning a function within a module, you need to clone the
function-local debug info and suppress cloning of global debug info (the
status quo suppresses cloning some global debug info but not all). When
cloning a function to a new/different module, you need to clone all of
the debug info.
Here's what I think we should do (eventually? soon? not this patch
though):
- Distinguish explicitly (somehow) between pure constant metadata owned
by the LLVMContext, global metadata owned by the Module, and local
metadata owned by a GlobalValue (such as a function).
- Update CloneFunctionInto to trigger cloning of all "local" metadata
(only), perhaps by adding a bit to RemapFlag. Alternatively, split
out a separate function CloneFunctionMetadataInto to prime the
metadata map that callers are updated to call ahead of time as
appropriate.
Here's the somewhat more isolated fix in this patch:
- Converted the `ModuleLevelChanges` parameter to `CloneFunctionInto` to
an enum called `CloneFunctionChangeType` that is one of
LocalChangesOnly, GlobalChanges, DifferentModule, and ClonedModule.
- The code maintaining the "functions uniquely own subprograms"
invariant is now only active in the first two cases, where a function
is being cloned within a single module. That's necessary because this
code inhibits cloning of (some) "global" metadata that's effectively
owned by the module.
- The code maintaining the "all compile units must be explicitly
referenced by !llvm.dbg.cu" invariant is now only active in the
DifferentModule case, where a function is being cloned into a new
module in isolation.
- CoroSplit.cpp's call to CloneFunctionInto in CoroCloner::create
uses LocalChangeOnly, since fa635d730f
only set `ModuleLevelChanges` to trigger cloning of local metadata.
- CloneModule drops its unsound use of RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs
and special handling of !llvm.dbg.cu.
- Fixed some outdated header docs and left a couple of FIXMEs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96531
The individual recipes have been updated to manage their operands using
VPUser a while back. Now that the transition is done, we can instead
make VPRecipeBase a VPUser and get rid of the toVPUser helper.
Rename the `RF_MoveDistinctMDs` flag passed into `MapValue` and
`MapMetadata` to `RF_ReuseAndMutateDistinctMDs` in order to more
precisely describe its effect and clarify the header documentation.
Found this while helping to investigate PR48841, which pointed out an
unsound use of the flag in `CloneModule()`. For now I've just added a
FIXME there, but I'm hopeful that the new (more precise) name will
prevent other similar errors.
I am trying to untangle the fast-math-flags propagation logic
in the vectorizers (see a6f022127 for SLP).
The loop vectorizer has a mix of checking FP function attributes,
IR-level FMF, and just wrong assumptions.
I am trying to avoid regressions while fixing this, and I think
the IR-level logic is good enough for that, but it's hard to say
for sure. This would be the 1st step in the clean-up.
The existing test that I changed to include 'fast' actually shows
a miscompile: the function only had the equivalent of nnan, but we
created new instructions that had fast (all FMF set). This is
similar to the example in https://llvm.org/PR35538
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95452
This patch unifies the way recipes and VPValues are printed after the
transition to VPDef.
VPSlotTracker has been updated to iterate over all recipes and all
their defined values to number those. There is no need to number
values in Value2VPValue.
It also updates a few places that only used slot numbers for
VPInstruction. All recipes now can produce numbered VPValues.
The new test case here contains a first order recurrences and an
instruction that is replicated. The first order recurrence forces an
instruction to be sunk _into_, as opposed to after the replication
region. That causes several things to go wrong including registering
vector instructions multiple times and failing to create dominance
relations correctly.
Instead we should be sinking to after the replication region, which is
what this patch makes sure happens.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93629
This is a follow-up patch of D87045.
The patch implements "loop-nest mode" for `LPMUpdater` and `FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor` in which only top-level loops are operated.
`createFunctionToLoopPassAdaptor` decides whether the returned adaptor is in loop-nest mode or not based on the given pass. If the pass is a loop-nest pass or the pass is a `LoopPassManager` which contains only loop-nest passes, the loop-nest version of adaptor is returned; otherwise, the normal (loop) version of adaptor is returned.
Reviewed By: Whitney
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87531
This patch makes VPRecipeBase a direct subclass of VPDef, moving the
SubclassID to VPDef.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90564
This patch turns updates VPInterleaveRecipe to manage the values it defines
using VPDef. The VPValue is used during VPlan construction and
codegeneration instead of the plain IR reference where possible.
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90562
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
Per http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_loopnest, the goal of this
patch (and other following patches) is to create facilities that allow
implementing loop nest passes that run on top-level loop nests for the
New Pass Manager.
This patch extends the functionality of LoopPassManager to handle
loop-nest passes by specializing the definition of LoopPassManager that
accepts both kinds of passes in addPass.
Only loop passes are executed if L is not a top-level one, and both
kinds of passes are executed if L is top-level. Currently, loop nest
passes should have the following run method:
PreservedAnalyses run(LoopNest &, LoopAnalysisManager &,
LoopStandardAnalysisResults &, LPMUpdater &);
Reviewed By: Whitney, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87045
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.
Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.
/// Original IR
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
br bb1
bb1:
br bb1.split
bb1.split:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
br bb1.split
bb1.split
br bb1
bb1:
%0 = mul i32 1, 2
br bb2
bb2:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
1. Removed #include "...AliasAnalysis.h" in other headers and modules.
2. Cleaned up includes in AliasAnalysis.h.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92489
Interleave groups also depend on the values they store. Manage the
stored values as VPUser operands. This is currently a NFC, but is
required to allow VPlan transforms and to manage generated vector values
exclusively in VPTransformState.
This is a follow-up to 00a6601136 to make
isa<VPReductionRecipe> work and unifies the VPValue ID names, by making
sure they all consistently start with VPV*.
This patch introduces a new VPDef class, which can be used to
manage VPValues defined by recipes/VPInstructions.
The idea here is to mirror VPUser for values defined by a recipe. A
VPDef can produce either zero (e.g. a store recipe), one (most recipes)
or multiple (VPInterleaveRecipe) result VPValues.
To traverse the def-use chain from a VPDef to its users, one has to
traverse the users of all values defined by a VPDef.
VPValues now contain a pointer to their corresponding VPDef, if one
exists. To traverse the def-use chain upwards from a VPValue, we first
need to check if the VPValue is defined by a VPDef. If it does not have
a VPDef, this means we have a VPValue that is not directly defined
iniside the plan and we are done.
If we have a VPDef, it is defined inside the region by a recipe, which
is a VPUser, and the upwards def-use chain traversal continues by
traversing all its operands.
Note that we need to add an additional field to to VPVAlue to link them
to their defs. The space increase is going to be offset by being able to
remove the SubclassID field in future patches.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90558
Update the code responsible for deleting VPBBs and recipes to properly
update users and release operands.
This is another preparation for D84680 & following patches towards
enabling modeling def-use chains in VPlan.
This adds a helper to convert a VPRecipeBase pointer to a VPUser, for
recipes that inherit from VPUser. Once VPRecipeBase directly inherits
from VPUser this helper can be removed.
When updating operands of a VPUser, we also have to adjust the list of
users for the new and old VPValues. This is required once we start
transitioning recipes to become VPValues.
Now that VPUser is not inheriting from VPValue, we can take the next
step and turn the recipes that already manage their operands via VPUser
into VPUsers directly. This is another small step towards traversing
def-use chains in VPlan.
This is NFC with respect to the generated code, but makes the interface
more powerful.
Matt Arsenault