I discovered this quirk when working on some DWARF - AST printing prints
type template parameters fully qualified, but printed template template
parameters the way they were written syntactically, or wholely
unqualified - instead, we should print them consistently with the way we
print type template parameters: fully qualified.
The one place this got weird was for partial specializations like in
ast-print-temp-class.cpp - hence the need for checking for
TemplateNameDependenceScope::DependentInstantiation template template
parameters. (not 100% sure that's the right solution to that, though -
open to ideas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108794
PartialDiagnostic misses some functions compared to DiagnosticBuilder.
This patch refactors DiagnosticBuilder and PartialDiagnostic, extracts
the common functionality so that the streaming << operators are
shared.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84362
This reverts commit 8e780a1653.
DiagnosticBuilder is a value type, created on the stack everywhere. IMO
we should not be adding a vtable to it, and making very operator<< use a
virtual interface. There are other feasible designs for implementing
this. The original review, D84362, was approved by @tra, who is
responsible for Clang's CUDA support, but it wasn't reviewed by @rsmith
or anyone responsible for clang's diagnostic library.
This recommits 829d14ee0a.
The patch was reverted due to a regression in some CUDA app
which was thought to be caused by this patch. However, investigation
showed that the regression was due to some other issues, therefore
recommit this patch.
PartialDiagnostic misses some functions compared to DiagnosticBuilder.
This patch refactors DiagnosticBuilder and PartialDiagnostic, extracts
the common functionality so that the streaming << operators are
shared.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84362
New code added in ec3060c72d looked like
+ case TemplateName::NameKind::OverloadedTemplate:
+ assert(false && "overloaded templates shouldn't survive to here.");
+ default:
If compiling without asserts we then got a warning about unannotated
fallthrough from the case into the default.
Change the assert into an llvm_unreachable to silence the warning.
Summary:
This changes introduces an enum to represent dependencies as a bitmask
and extract common patterns from code that computes dependency bits into
helper functions.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik, ilya-biryukov, hokein
Subscribers: hokein, sammccall, Mordante, riccibruno, merge_guards_bot, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71920
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
Because diagnostics and their notes are not connected at the API level,
if the error message for an overload is emitted, then the overload
candidates are completed - if a diagnostic is emitted during that work,
the notes related to overload candidates would be attached to the latter
diagnostic, not the original error. Sort of worse, if the latter
diagnostic was disabled, the notes are disabled.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61357
llvm-svn: 359854
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Specifically, we would not properly parse these types within template arguments
(for non-type template parameters), and in tentative parses. Fixing both of
these essentially requires that we parse deduced template specialization types
as types in all contexts, even in template argument lists -- in particular,
tentative parsing may look ahead and annotate a deduced template specialization
type before we figure out that we're actually supposed to treat the tokens as a
template-name. We deal with this by simply permitting deduced template
specialization types when parsing template arguments, and converting them to
template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 326299
keys, and PointerIntPairs where the pointee types are incomplete
out-of-line to where we have the complete type.
This is the standard pattern used throughout the AST library to address
the inherently mutually cross referenced nature of the AST.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
llvm-svn: 256612
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
type/expression/template argument/etc. is instantiation-dependent if
it somehow involves a template parameter, even if it doesn't meet the
requirements for the more common kinds of dependence (dependent type,
type-dependent expression, value-dependent expression).
When we see an instantiation-dependent type, we know we always need to
perform substitution into that instantiation-dependent type. This
keeps us from short-circuiting evaluation in places where we
shouldn't, and lets us properly implement C++0x [temp.type]p2.
In theory, this would also allow us to properly mangle
instantiation-dependent-but-not-dependent decltype types per the
Itanium C++ ABI, but we aren't quite there because we still mangle
based on the canonical type in cases like, e.g.,
template<unsigned> struct A { };
template<typename T>
void f(A<sizeof(sizeof(decltype(T() + T())))>) { }
template void f<int>(A<sizeof(sizeof(int))>);
and therefore get the wrong answer.
llvm-svn: 134225
for a template template parameter.
Uses to follow.
I've also made the uniquing of SubstTemplateTemplateParmPacks
use a ContextualFoldingSet as a minor space efficiency.
llvm-svn: 134137
to cope with non-type templates by providing appropriate
errors. Previously, we would either assert, crash, or silently build a
dependent type when we shouldn't. Fixes PR9226.
llvm-svn: 127037
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
and TemplateArgument with an operation that determines whether there
are any unexpanded parameter packs within that construct. Use this
information to diagnose the appearance of the names of parameter packs
that have not been expanded (C++ [temp.variadic]p5). Since this
property is checked often (every declaration, ever expression
statement, etc.), we extend Type and Expr with a bit storing the
result of this computation, rather than walking the AST each time to
determine whether any unexpanded parameter packs occur.
This commit is deficient in several ways, which will be remedied with
future commits:
- Expr has a bit to store the presence of an unexpanded parameter
pack, but it is never set.
- The error messages don't point out where the unexpanded parameter
packs were named in the type/expression, but they should.
- We don't check for unexpanded parameter packs in all of the places
where we should.
- Testing is sparse, pending the resolution of the above three
issues.
llvm-svn: 121724
PCH got a severe beating by the boost-using test case reported here: http://llvm.org/PR8099
Fix issues like:
-When PCH reading, make sure Decl's getASTContext() doesn't get called since a Decl in the parent hierarchy may be initializing.
-In ASTDeclReader::VisitFunctionDecl VisitRedeclarable should be called before using FunctionDecl's isCanonicalDecl()
-In ASTDeclReader::VisitRedeclarableTemplateDecl CommonOrPrev must be initialized before anything else.
llvm-svn: 113391
parameter, explicitly ask the user to give it arguments. We used to
complain that it wasn't a type and expect the user to figure it out.
llvm-svn: 100729
templates, e.g.,
x.template get<T>
We can now parse these, represent them within an UnresolvedMemberExpr
expression, then instantiate that expression node in simple cases.
This allows us to stumble through parsing LLVM's Casting.h.
llvm-svn: 81300
A template name can refer to a set of overloaded function
templates. Model this in TemplateName, which can now refer to an
OverloadedFunctionDecl that contains function templates. This removes
an unspeakable hack in Sema::isTemplateName.
llvm-svn: 77488
This is simple enough, but then I thought it would be nice to make PrintingPolicy
get a LangOptions so that various things can key off "bool" and "C++" independently.
This spiraled out of control. There are many fixme's, but I think things are slightly
better than they were before.
One thing that can be improved: CFG should probably have an ASTContext pointer in it,
which would simplify its clients.
llvm-svn: 74493
printing logic to help customize the output. For now, we use this
rather than a special flag to suppress the "struct" when printing
"struct X" and to print the Boolean type as "bool" in C++ but "_Bool"
in C.
llvm-svn: 72590
template template parameters and dependent template names. For
example, the oft-mentioned
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>::type
can now be instantiated, with the appropriate name lookup for "apply".
llvm-svn: 68128
representation handles the various ways in which one can name a
template, including unqualified references ("vector"), qualified
references ("std::vector"), and dependent template names
("MetaFun::template apply").
One immediate effect of this change is that the representation of
nested-name-specifiers in type names for class template
specializations (e.g., std::vector<int>) is more accurate. Rather than
representing std::vector<int> as
std::(vector<int>)
we represent it as
(std::vector)<int>
which more closely follows the C++ grammar.
Additionally, templates are no longer represented as declarations
(DeclPtrTy) in Parse-Sema interactions. Instead, I've introduced a new
OpaquePtr type (TemplateTy) that holds the representation of a
TemplateName. This will simplify the handling of dependent
template-names, once we get there.
llvm-svn: 68074
David Blaikie