Employed the following refactorings:
- Renamed some functions
- Introduced explaining variables
- Cleaned up & added comments
- Used Optional<unsigned> for return value instead of an out parameter
- Added assertions
- Constified a few member functions
No functionality change.
All regressions pass.
llvm-svn: 196662
__builtin_types_compatible_p() isn't a C++ type trait at all, rather a GNU C
special-case, so it's fine to use BoolTy the default return type for binary
type traits.
This brings BTT in line with other arities that already default to BoolTy.
Cleanup only, no change in behaviour.
llvm-svn: 196646
attribute in sema and issuing a variety of diagnostics lazily
for misuse of this attribute (and what to do) when converting
from CF types to ObjectiveC types (and vice versa).
// rdar://15499111
llvm-svn: 196629
This commit changes -Wassign-enum to compare unqualified types. One could
think that this does not matter much, because who wants a value of enum type
that is const-qualified? But this breaks the intended pattern to silence this
warning with an explicit cast:
static const enum Foo z = (enum Foo) 42;
In this case, source type is 'enum Foo', and destination type is 'const enum
Foo', and if we compare qualified types, they don't match, so we used warn.
llvm-svn: 196548
the following pattern.
If 'case' expression refers to a static const variable of the correct enum
type, then we count this as a sufficient declaration of intent by the user,
so we silence the warning.
llvm-svn: 196546
category is declared in category's primary
class's super class. Because the super class is
expected to implemented the method. // rdar://15580969
llvm-svn: 196531
within their namespace, and such a redeclaration isn't required to be a
definition any more.
Update DR status page to say Clang 3.4 instead of SVN and add new Clang 3.5
category (but keep Clang 3.4 yellow for now).
llvm-svn: 196481
Use FunctionTypeUnwrapper like we do in AttributedType to try to keep
some sugar. We can actually do one better here in the future by
avoiding the AdjustedType node altogether when no sugar would be lost.
llvm-svn: 196455
For an init capture, process the initialization expression
right away. For lambda init-captures such as the following:
const int x = 10;
auto L = [i = x+1](int a) {
return [j = x+2,
&k = x](char b) { };
};
keep in mind that each lambda init-capture has to have:
- its initialization expression executed in the context
of the enclosing/parent decl-context.
- but the variable itself has to be 'injected' into the
decl-context of its lambda's call-operator (which has
not yet been created).
Each init-expression is a full-expression that has to get
Sema-analyzed (for capturing etc.) before its lambda's
call-operator's decl-context, scope & scopeinfo are pushed on their
respective stacks. Thus if any variable is odr-used in the init-capture
it will correctly get captured in the enclosing lambda, if one exists.
The init-variables above are created later once the lambdascope and
call-operators decl-context is pushed onto its respective stack.
Since the lambda init-capture's initializer expression occurs in the
context of the enclosing function or lambda, therefore we can not wait
till a lambda scope has been pushed on before deciding whether the
variable needs to be captured. We also need to process all
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions and discarded-value conversions,
so that we can avoid capturing certain constant variables.
For e.g.,
void test() {
const int x = 10;
auto L = [&z = x](char a) { <-- don't capture by the current lambda
return [y = x](int i) { <-- don't capture by enclosing lambda
return y;
}
};
If x was not const, the second use would require 'L' to capture, and
that would be an error.
Make sure TranformLambdaExpr is also aware of this.
Patch approved by Richard (Thanks!!)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092
llvm-svn: 196454
Summary:
In general, this type node can be used to represent any type adjustment
that occurs implicitly without losing type sugar. The immediate use of
this is to adjust the calling conventions of member function pointer
types without breaking template instantiation.
Fixes PR17996.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2332
llvm-svn: 196451
nested-name-specifier, rather than crashing. (In fact, reject all
literal-operator-ids that have a non-namespace nested-name-specifier). The
grammar doesn't allow these in some cases, and in other cases does allow them
but instantiation will always fail.
llvm-svn: 196443
Clang currently croaks on the following:
struct X1 {
struct X2 {
int L = ([] (int i) { return i; })(2);
};
};
asserting that the containing lexical context of the lambda is not Sema's cur context, when pushing the lambda's decl context on.
This occurs because (prior to this patch) getContainingDC always returns the non-nested class for functions at class scope (even for inline member functions of nested classes (to account for delayed parsing of their bodies)). The patch addresses this by having getContainingDC always return the lexical DC for a lambda's call operator.
Link to the bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18052
Link to Richard Smith's feedback on phabricator: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2331
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 196423
which specifies couple of (optional) method selectors
for bridging a CFobject to or from an ObjectiveC
object. This is wip. // rdsr://15499111
llvm-svn: 196408
Summary:
MSVC destroys arguments in the callee from left to right. Because C++
objects have to be destroyed in the reverse order of construction, Clang
has to construct arguments from right to left and destroy arguments from
left to right.
This patch fixes the ordering by reversing the order of evaluation of
all call arguments under the MS C++ ABI.
Fixes PR18035.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2275
llvm-svn: 196402
We would lose track of the mangling number assigned to the original
declaration which would cause us to create manglings that didn't match
the Itanium C++ specification.
e.g. Two static fields with the same name inside of a function template
would receive the same mangling with LLVM fixing up the second field so
they wouldn't collide. This would create an incompatibility with other
compilers following the Itanium ABI.
I've confirmed that the new mangling is identical to the ones generated
by icc and gcc.
N.B. This was uncovered while working on Microsoft mangler.
llvm-svn: 196368
super another initializer and when the implementation does not delegate to
another initializer via a call on 'self'.
A secondary initializer is an initializer method not marked as a designated
initializer within a class that has at least one initializer marked as a
designated initializer.
llvm-svn: 196318
designated initializers of an interface.
If the interface declaration does not have methods marked as designated
initializers then the interface inherits the designated initializers of
its super class.
llvm-svn: 196315
Faisal Vali