to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
The FP happens when a casting nullptr expression is used within a NULL-default-arguemnt cxx constructor.
Before the fix, the check will give a warning on nullptr when running
with the test case, which should not happen:
```
G(g(static_cast<char*>(nullptr)));
^~~~~~~~~~~
nullptr
```
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits, xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34524
llvm-svn: 306091
Summary:
This patch is lifting matchers used by more than one checkers
to the common namespace.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19841
llvm-svn: 269804
Summary: When traversing the parent map, the check assumed that all the nodes would be either Stmt or Decl. After r251101, this is no longer true: there can be TypeLoc and NestedNameSpecifierLoc nodes.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14229
llvm-svn: 251803
Summary:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24960
modernize-use-nullptr would hit an assertion in some cases involving macros and initializer lists, due to finding a node with more than one parent (the two forms of the initializer list).
However, this doesn't mean that the replacement is incorrect, so instead of just rejecting this case I tried to find a way to make it work. Looking at the semantic form of the InitListExpr made sense to me (looking at both forms results in false negatives) but I am not sure of the things that we can miss by skipping the syntactic form.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13246
llvm-svn: 249291
While convenient, RecursiveASTVisitor generates a ridiculous amount of dead
template code. Making it not visible from the outside lets the compiler
eliminate some of it, shrinking clang-tidy by ~140k.
llvm-svn: 245548
This patch re-applies r245434 and r245471 reverted in r245493, and changes the
way custom null macros are configured. The test for custom null macros is
temporarily excluded and will be committed separately to reduce chances of
breakages.
Initial patches by Angel Garcia.
llvm-svn: 245511
Chandler Carruth