include/llvm/MC/MCTargetAsmParser.h:46:8: error: 'llvm::ParseInstructionInfo' has a field 'llvm::ParseInstructionInfo::AsmRewrites' whose type uses the anonymous namespace [-Werror]
llvm-svn: 166729
path notes for cases where a value may be assumed to be null, etc.
Instead of having redundant diagnostics, do a pass over the generated
PathDiagnostic pieces and remove notes from TrackConstraintBRVisitor
that are already covered by ConditionBRVisitor, whose notes tend
to be better.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12252783>
llvm-svn: 166728
This is the first of several steps to incorporate information from the new
TargetTransformInfo infrastructure into BBVectorize. Two things are done here:
1. Target information is used to determine if it is profitable to fuse two
instructions. This means that the cost of the vector operation must not
be more expensive than the cost of the two original operations. Pairs that
are not profitable are no longer considered (because current cost information
is incomplete, for intrinsics for example, equal-cost pairs are still
considered).
2. The 'cost savings' computed for the profitability check are also used to
rank the DAGs that represent the potential vectorization plans. Specifically,
for nodes of non-trivial depth, the cost savings is used as the node
weight.
The next step will be to incorporate the shuffle costs into the DAG weighting;
this will give the edges of the DAG weights as well. Once that is done, when
target information is available, we should be able to dispense with the
depth heuristic.
llvm-svn: 166716
Most places can use PrintFatalError as the unwinding mechanism was not
used for anything other than printing the error. The single exception
was CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp, where intermediate errors during type
resolution were ignored to simplify incremental platform development.
This use is replaced by an error flag in TreePattern and bailout earlier
in various places if it is set.
llvm-svn: 166712
The isValueEqualityComparison() guard at the top of SimplifySwitch()
only applies to some of the possible transformations.
The newer transformations work just fine on large switches, and the
check on predecessor count is nonsensical.
llvm-svn: 166710
* Use conventional naming for KindHandlers.
* Add X86 relocation routines.
* Use std::function instead of function pointers in _fixupHandler map.
* Change _fixupHandler map from std::map to llvm::DenseMap.
* Add simple testcase for x86 relocations.
llvm-svn: 166700
Relationship maps are represented as InstrMapping records which are parsed by
TableGen and the information is used to construct mapping tables to represent
appropriate relations between instructions. These tables are emitted into
XXXGenInstrInfo.inc file along with the functions to query them.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma <jverma@codeaurora.org>.
llvm-svn: 166685
and also fixes the R_PPC64_TOC16 and R_PPC64_TOC16_DS relocation offset.
The 'nop' is needed so a restore TOC instruction (ld r2,40(r1)) can be placed
by the linker to correct restore the TOC of previous function.
Current code has two issues: it defines in PPCInstr64Bit.td file a LDinto_toc
and LDtoc_restore as a DSForm_1 with DS_RA=0 where it should be
DS=2 (the 8 bytes displacement of the TOC saving). It also wrongly emits a
MC intruction using an uint32_t value while the PPC::BL8_NOP_ELF
and PPC::BLA8_NOP_ELF are both uint64_t (because of the following 'nop').
This patch corrects the remaining ExecutionEngine using MCJIT:
ExecutionEngine/2002-12-16-ArgTest.ll
ExecutionEngine/2003-05-07-ArgumentTest.ll
ExecutionEngine/2005-12-02-TailCallBug.ll
ExecutionEngine/hello.ll
ExecutionEngine/hello2.ll
ExecutionEngine/test-call.ll
llvm-svn: 166682
structs having size 3, 5, 6, or 7. Such a struct must be passed and received
as right-justified within its register or memory slot. The problem is only
present for structs that are passed in registers.
Previously, as part of a patch handling all structs of size less than 8, I
added logic to rotate the incoming register so that the struct was left-
justified prior to storing the whole register. This was incorrect because
the address of the parameter had already been adjusted earlier to point to
the right-adjusted value in the storage slot. Essentially I had accidentally
accounted for the right-adjustment twice.
In this patch, I removed the incorrect logic and reorganized the code to make
the flow clearer.
The removal of the rotates changes the expected code generation, so test case
structsinregs.ll has been modified to reflect this. I also added a new test
case, jaggedstructs.ll, to demonstrate that structs of these sizes can now
be properly received and passed.
I've built and tested the code on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with no new
regressions. I also ran the GCC compatibility test suite and verified that
earlier problems with these structs are now resolved, with no new regressions.
llvm-svn: 166680
Richard Smith