(This relands 59337263ab and makes sure comma operator
diagnostics are suppressed in a SFINAE context.)
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
Rather than sprinkle calls to DiagnoseUnusedExprResult() around in places where we want diagnostics, we now diagnose unused expression statements and full expressions in a more generic way when acting on the final expression statement. This results in more appropriate diagnostics for [[nodiscard]] where we were previously lacking them, such as when the body of a for loop is not a compound statement.
This patch fixes PR39837.
llvm-svn: 350404
function-style cast to a non-dependent type which is then used in an invalid
way. We'd lose the "type dependent" bit here, and downstream Sema processing
would then discard the expression if it was used in a context where its type
rendered it invalid.
llvm-svn: 274267
No semantic analysis yet.
This is a pain to disambiguate correctly, because the parsing rules for the
declaration form of a condition and of an init-statement are quite different --
for a token sequence that looks like a declaration, we frequently need to
disambiguate all the way to the ')' or ';'.
We could do better here in some cases by stopping disambiguation once we've
decided whether we've got an expression or not (rather than keeping going until
we know whether it's an init-statement declaration or a condition declaration),
by unifying our parsing code for the two types of declaration and moving the
syntactic checks into Sema; if this has a measurable impact on parsing
performance, I'll look into that.
llvm-svn: 274169
Yuanfang Chen