The docs now build cleanly. Yay!
The following warnings were fixed:
/home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.rst:364: WARNING: Enumerated list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/InAlloca.rst:: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree
/home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst:85: WARNING: Title underline too short.
Supported C++11 Language and Library Features
-------------------------------------------
/home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst:85: WARNING: Title underline too short.
Supported C++11 Language and Library Features
-------------------------------------------
/home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/GettingStarted.rst:185: WARNING: Explicit markup ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/GettingStarted.rst:565: WARNING: Explicit markup ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
/home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/GettingStarted.rst:567: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
llvm-svn: 202603
This generalizes the code to eliminate extra truncs/exts around i1 bit
operations to also do the same on PPC64 for i32 bit operations. This eliminates
a fairly prevalent code wart:
int foo(int a) {
return a == 5 ? 7 : 8;
}
On PPC64, because of the extension implied by the ABI, this would generate:
cmplwi 0, 3, 5
li 12, 8
li 4, 7
isel 3, 4, 12, 2
rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32
blr
where the 'rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32', the extension, is completely unnecessary. At
least for the single-BB case (which is all that the DAG combine mechanism can
handle), this unnecessary extension is no longer generated.
llvm-svn: 202600
to the build being C++11.
There is clearly still plenty of simplification than can be done here by
using standard type traits instead of rolling our own in many places.
llvm-svn: 202586
on the fact that we now build in C++11 mode with modern compilers. This
should flush out any issues. If the build bots are happy with this, I'll
GC all the code for coping without R-value references.
llvm-svn: 202574
lib/Support/RWMutex.cpp contains an implementation of RWMutex that
uses pthread_rwlock, but when pthread_rwlock is not available (such as
under NaCl, when using newlib), it silently falls back to using the
no-op definition in lib/Support/Unix/RWMutex.inc, which is not
thread-safe.
Fix this case to be thread-safe by using a normal mutex.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2892
llvm-svn: 202570
baseline is now C++11, and we unconditionally add -std=c++11 to the
flags.
This has the dim potential to break some non-GNU-compatible compiler (in
terms of -std flags) using the makefiles, but those makefiles are
littered with GNU-style compile flags so it would be very surprising to
me for it to actually happen in practice. As always, do let me know if
there is a toolchain you're using where this doesn't work, and I'll be
watching the bots.
llvm-svn: 202569
C++11. I'm not sure that this is a good idea, but I know some crazy
folks on the core working group who like to live dangerously, and they
should still be able to build LLD. =D
llvm-svn: 202568
The switch has been thrown. While I'm still watching for any failures or
problems with this, the documentation can go ahead and move forward.
llvm-svn: 202566
When lowering a bitfield, CGRecordLowering would assign the wrong
storage type to a bitfield in some cases and trigger an assertion. In
these cases the layout was still correct, just the bitfield info was
wrong.
llvm-svn: 202562
it, importers of B should not see the macro. This is complicated by the fact
that A's macro could also be visible through a different path. The rules (as
hashed out on cfe-commits) are included as a documentation update in this
change.
With this, the number of regressions in libc++'s testsuite when modules are
enabled drops from 47 to 7. Those remaining 7 are also macro-related, and are
due to remaining bugs in this change (in particular, the handling of submodules
is imperfect).
llvm-svn: 202560
This documents some of the status of supported functionality in MSVC
quirks mode. Some of this should be in
http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html instead when things have
stabilized.
llvm-svn: 202559
Inside iterate, we scan backwards then scan forwards in a loop. When iteration
is not zero, the last node was just updated so we can skip it. But when
iteration is zero, we can't skip the last node.
For the testing case, fixing this will save a spill and move register copies
from hot path to cold path.
llvm-svn: 202557
Sean Silva