Function Parser::ParseAvailabilityAttribute checks that the message string of
an availability attribute is not a wide string literal. Test case
clang/test/Parser/attr-availability.c specifies that a string literal is
expected.
The code checked that the first token in a string concatenation is a string
literal, and then that the concatenated string consists of 1-byte characters.
On a target where wide character is 1 byte, a string concatenation "a" L"b"
passes both those checks, but L"b" alone is rejected. More generally, "a" u8"b"
passes the checks, but u8"b" alone is rejected.
So check isAscii() instead of character size.
_Nullable_result generally like _Nullable, except when being imported into a
swift async method. rdar://70106409
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92495
552c6c2 removed support for promoting VLAs to constant arrays when the bounds
isn't an ICE, since this can result in miscompiling a conforming program that
assumes that the array is a VLA. Promoting VLAs for fields is still supported,
since clang doesn't support VLAs in fields, so no conforming program could have
a field VLA.
This change is really disruptive, so this commit carves out two more cases
where we promote VLAs which can't miscompile a conforming program:
- When the VLA appears in an ivar -- this seems like a corollary to the field thing
- When the VLA has an initializer -- VLAs can't have an initializer
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90871
Reviewed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91409 by Aaron.
Highlights of the review:
- avoid an underlying type for enums
- avoid enum bit fields (MSVC packing anomalies) and favor static_casts to unsigned bit-fields
Patch by Thorsten Schuett <schuett@gmail.com> w some minor fixes in SemaType.cpp where a couple asserts had to be repaired to deal with lack of implicit coversion to int.
Thanks Thorsten!
Since these are scoped enumerators, they have to be prefixed by DeclaratorContext, so lets remove Context from the name, and return some characters to the multiverse.
Patch was reviewed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91011
Thank you to aaron, bruno, wyatt and barry for indulging me.
We collect the source location of a trailing return type in the parser,
improving the location for regular functions and providing a location
for lambdas, where previously there was none.
Fixes PR47732.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90129
Given the following VarTemplateDecl AST,
```
VarTemplateDecl col:26 X
|-TemplateTypeParmDecl typename depth 0 index 0
`-VarDecl X 'bool' cinit
`-CXXBoolLiteralExpr 'bool' true
```
previously, we returned the VarDecl as the top-level decl, which was not
correct, the top-level decl should be VarTemplateDecl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89098
The current C++ grammar allows an anonymous bit-field with an attribute,
but this is ambiguous (the attribute in that case could appertain to the
type instead of the bit-field). The current thinking in the Core Working
Group is that it's better to disallow attributes in that position at the
grammar level so that the ambiguity resolves in favor of applying to the
type.
During discussions about the behavior of the attribute, the Core Working
Group also felt it was better to disallow anonymous bit-fields from
specifying a default member initializer.
This implements both sets of related grammar changes.
Add the `swift_newtype` attribute which allows a type definition to be
imported into Swift as a new type. The imported type must be either an
enumerated type (enum) or an object type (struct).
This is based on the work of the original changes in
8afaf3aad2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87652
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
For example:
#define FOO(x) (x)
FOO({});
... forms a statement-expression after macro expansion. This warning
applies to '({' and '})' delimiting statement-expressions, '[[' and ']]'
delimiting attributes, and '::*' introducing a pointer-to-member.
The warning for forming these compound tokens across macro expansions
(or across files!) is enabled by default; the warning for whitespace
within the tokens is not, but is included in -Wall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86751
name annotation.
Instead, defer forming the member access expression or DeclRefExpr until
we build the use of ClassifyName's result. Just build an
UnresolvedLookupExpr to track the LookupResult until we're ready to
consume it.
This also reverts commit 2f7269b677 (other
than its testcase). That change was an attempted workaround for the same
problem.
Summary:
Provide `default` and `delete` completion after the function equals.
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82548
The ParseStructUnionBody function was separately keeping track of the
field decls for historical reasons, however the "ActOn" functions add
the field to the RecordDecl anyway.
The "ParseStructDeclaration" function, which handles parsing fields
didn't have a way of handling what happens on an anonymous field, and
changing it would alter a large amount of objc code, so I chose instead
to implement this by just filling the FieldDecls vector with the actual
FieldDecls that were successfully added to the recorddecl .
Summary:
This patch upstreams support for a new storage only bfloat16 C type.
This type is used to implement primitive support for bfloat16 data, in
line with the Bfloat16 extension of the Armv8.6-a architecture, as
detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/arm-architecture-developments-armv8-6-a
The bfloat type, and its properties are specified in the Arm Architecture
Reference Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0487/latest/arm-architecture-reference-manual-armv8-for-armv8-a-architecture-profile
In detail this patch:
- introduces an opaque, storage-only C-type __bf16, which introduces a new bfloat IR type.
This is part of a patch series, starting with command-line and Bfloat16
assembly support. The subsequent patches will upstream intrinsics
support for BFloat16, followed by Matrix Multiplication and the
remaining Virtualization features of the armv8.6-a architecture.
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Luke Cheeseman
- Momchil Velikov
- Alexandros Lamprineas
- Luke Geeson
- Simon Tatham
- Ties Stuij
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, rjmccall, rsmith, liutianle, RKSimon, craig.topper, jfb, LukeGeeson, fpetrogalli
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: labrinea, majnemer, asmith, dexonsmith, kristof.beyls, arphaman, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76077
Objective-C++11 and under MS extensions.
This matches the MSVC behavior, and means that Objective-C behaves as a
set of extensions to the base language, rather than replacing the base
language rule with a different one.
The 'class' or 'struct' keyword is only permitted as part of either an
enum definition or a standalone opaque-enum-declaration, not as part of
an elaborated type specifier. We previously failed to diagnose this, and
generally didn't properly implement the restrictions on elaborated type
specifiers for enumeration types.
In passing, also fixed incorrect parsing for enum-bases, which we
previously parsed as a type-name, but are actually a type-specifier-seq.
This matters for cases like 'enum E : int *p;', which is valid as a
Microsoft extension.
Plus some minor parse diagnostic improvements.
Bumped the recently-added ExtWarn for 'enum E : int x;' to be
DefaultError; this is not an intentional extension, so producing an
error by default seems appropriate, but the warning flag to disable it
may still be useful for code written against old Clang. The same
treatment is given here to the diagnostic for 'enum class E x;', which
we similarly have incorrectly accepted for many years. These diagnostics
continue to be suppressed under -fms-extensions and when compiling
Objective-C code. We will need to decide separately whether Objective-C
should follow the C++ rules or the (older) MSVC rules.
Previously we implemented non-standard disambiguation rules to
distinguish an enum-base from a bit-field but otherwise treated a :
after an elaborated-enum-specifier as introducing an enum-base. That
misparses various examples (anywhere an elaborated-type-specifier can
appear followed by a colon, such as within a ternary operator or
_Generic).
We now implement the C++11 rules, with the old cases accepted as
extensions where that seemed reasonable. These amount to:
* an enum-base must always be accompanied by an enum definition (except
in a standalone declaration of the form 'enum E : T;')
* in a member-declaration, 'enum E :' always introduces an enum-base,
never a bit-field
* in a type-specifier (or similar context), 'enum E :' is not
permitted; the colon means whatever else it would mean in that
context.
Fixed underlying types for enums are also permitted in Objective-C and
under MS extensions, plus as a language extension in all other modes.
The behavior in ObjC and MS extensions modes is unchanged (but the
bit-field disambiguation is a bit better); remaining language modes
follow the C++11 rules.
Fixes PR45726, PR39979, PR19810, PR44941, and most of PR24297, plus C++
core issues 1514 and 1966.
This reverts commit 61ba1481e2.
I'm reverting this because it breaks the lldb build with
incomplete switch coverage warnings. I would fix it forward,
but am not familiar enough with lldb to determine the correct
fix.
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:3958:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4633:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4889:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
Introduction/Motivation:
LLVM-IR supports integers of non-power-of-2 bitwidth, in the iN syntax.
Integers of non-power-of-two aren't particularly interesting or useful
on most hardware, so much so that no language in Clang has been
motivated to expose it before.
However, in the case of FPGA hardware normal integer types where the
full bitwidth isn't used, is extremely wasteful and has severe
performance/space concerns. Because of this, Intel has introduced this
functionality in the High Level Synthesis compiler[0]
under the name "Arbitrary Precision Integer" (ap_int for short). This
has been extremely useful and effective for our users, permitting them
to optimize their storage and operation space on an architecture where
both can be extremely expensive.
We are proposing upstreaming a more palatable version of this to the
community, in the form of this proposal and accompanying patch. We are
proposing the syntax _ExtInt(N). We intend to propose this to the WG14
committee[1], and the underscore-capital seems like the active direction
for a WG14 paper's acceptance. An alternative that Richard Smith
suggested on the initial review was __int(N), however we believe that
is much less acceptable by WG14. We considered _Int, however _Int is
used as an identifier in libstdc++ and there is no good way to fall
back to an identifier (since _Int(5) is indistinguishable from an
unnamed initializer of a template type named _Int).
[0]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/software/programmable/quartus-prime/hls-compiler.html)
[1]http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2472.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967
Summary:
Previously, clang emitted a less-usefull diagnostic and didnt recover
well when the keywords is used as identifier in function paramter.
```
void foo(int case, int x); // previously we drop all parameters after
`int case`.
```
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77633
Instead of bailing out of parsing when we encounter an invalid
template-name or template arguments in a template-id, produce an
annotation token describing the invalid construct.
This avoids duplicate errors and generally allows us to recover better.
In principle we should be able to extend this to store some kinds of
invalid template-id in the AST for tooling use, but that isn't handled
as part of this change.
Suppress those diagnostics if lhs of a member expression contains
errors. Typo correction produces dependent expressions even in
non-template code, that led to spurious diagnostics before.
previous:
/tmp/t.cpp:6:17: error: use 'template' keyword to treat 'f' as a dependent template name
auto a = bilder.f<int>();
^
template
/tmp/t.cpp:6:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bilder'; did you mean 'builder'?
auto a = bilder.f<int>();
^~~~~~
builder
vs now:
/tmp/t.cpp:6:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bilder'; did you mean 'builder'?
auto a = bilder.f<int>();
^~~~~~
builder
Original patch from Ilya.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65592
TryAnnotateTypeConstraint could annotate a template-id which doesn't end up being a type-constraint,
in which case control flow would incorrectly flow into ParseImplicitInt.
Reenter the loop in this case.
Enable relevant tests for C++20. This required disabling typo-correction during TryAnnotateTypeConstraint
and changing a test case which is broken due to a separate bug (will be reported and handled separately).
isDeclarationSpecifiers did not handle some cases of placeholder-type-specifiers with
type-constraints, causing parsing bugs in abbreviated constructor templates.
Add comprehensive handling of type-constraints to isDeclarationSpecifier.
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after fixing MSAN failures caused by incomplete initialization of AutoTypeLocs in TypeSpecLocFiller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after incorrect check in NonTypeTemplateParmDecl broke lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
Implement support for C++2a requires-expressions.
Re-commit after compilation failure on some platforms due to alignment issues with PointerIntPair.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50360
A TemplateIdAnnotation represents only a template-id, not a
nested-name-specifier plus a template-id. Don't make a redundant copy of
the CXXScopeSpec and store it on the template-id annotation.
This slightly improves error recovery by more properly handling the case
where we would form an invalid CXXScopeSpec while parsing a typename
specifier, instead of accidentally putting the token stream into a
broken "annot_template_id with a scope specifier, but with no preceding
annot_cxxscope token" state.
This needs somewhat careful disambiguation, as C++2a explicit(bool) is a
breaking change. We only enable it in cases where the source construct
could not possibly be anything else.
Nigel Perks