It was just calling a bunch of DwarfUnit functions anyway, as can be
seen by the simplification of removing "TheCU" from all the function
calls in the implementation.
llvm-svn: 219103
In preparation for sinking all the subprogram emission code down from
DwarfDebug into DwarfCompileUnit, this will avoid bloating
DwarfUnit.h/cpp greatly and make concerns a bit more clear/isolated.
(sinking this handling down is part of the work to handle emitting
minimal subprograms for -gmlt-like data into the skeleton CU under
fission)
llvm-svn: 219057
This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).
Original commit message follows.
--
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
llvm-svn: 219010
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
llvm-svn: 218914
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
llvm-svn: 218787
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
llvm-svn: 218778
This allows proper disambiguation of unbounded arrays and arrays of zero
bound ("struct foo { int x[]; };" and "struct foo { int x[0]; }"). GCC
instead produces an upper bound of -1 in the latter situation, but count
seems tidier. This way lower_bound is provided if it's not the language
default and count is provided if the count is known, otherwise it's
omitted. Simple.
If someone wants to look at rdar://problem/12566646 and see if this
change is acceptable to that bug/fix, that might be helpful (see the
empty-and-one-elem-array.ll test case which cites that radar).
llvm-svn: 218726
To reduce the size of -gmlt data, skip the subprograms without any
inlined subroutines. Since we've now got the ability to make these
determinations in the backend (funnily enough - we added the flag so we
wouldn't produce ranges under -gmlt, but with this change we use the
flag, but go back to producing ranges under -gmlt).
Instead, just produce CU ranges to inform the consumer which parts of
the code are described by this CU's line table. Tools could inspect the
line table directly to compute the range, but the CU ranges only seem to
be about 0.5% of object/executable size, so I'm not too worried about
teaching llvm-symbolizer that trick just yet - it's certainly a possible
piece of future work.
Update an llvm-symbolizer test just to demonstrate that this schema is
acceptable there (if it wasn't, the compiler-rt tests would catch this,
but good to have an in-llvm-tree test for llvm-symbolizer's behavior
here)
Building the clang binary with -gmlt with this patch reduces the total
size of object files by 5.1% (5.56% without ranges) without compression
and the executable by 4.37% (4.75% without ranges).
llvm-svn: 218129
Summary:
This will allow to request the creation of a forward delacred variable
at is point of use (for imported declarations, this will be
DwarfDebug::constructImportedEntityDIE) rather than having to put the
forward decl in a retention list.
Note that getOrCreateGlobalVariable returns the actual definition DIE when the
routine creates a declaration and a definition DIE. If you agree this is the
right behavior, then I'll have a followup patch that registers the definition
in the DIE map instead of the declaration as it is today (this 'breaks' only
one test, where we test that the imported entity is the declaration). I'm
not sure what's best here, but it's easy enough for a consumer to follow the
DW_AT_specification link to get to the declaration, whereas it takes more
work to find the actual definition from a declaration DIE.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5381
llvm-svn: 218126
This omission will be done in a fancier manner once we're dealing with
"put gmlt in the skeleton CUs under fission" - it'll have to be
conditional on the kind of CU we're emitting into (skeleton or gmlt).
llvm-svn: 218098
The patch moved some logic around in an attempt to generate potentially more
DW_AT_declaration attributes. The patch was flawed though and it stopped
generating the attribute in some cases.
llvm-svn: 218060
Summary:
This doesn't show up today as we don't emit decalration only variables. This
will be tested when the followup patches implementing import of forward
declared entities lands in clang.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5382
llvm-svn: 218041
And since it /looked/ like the DwarfStrSectionSym was unused, I tried
removing it - but then it turned out that DwarfStringPool was
reconstructing the same label (and expecting it to have already been
emitted) and uses that.
So I kept it around, but wanted to pass it in to users - since it seemed
a bit silly for DwarfStringPool to have it passed in and returned but
itself have no use for it. The only two users don't handle strings in
both .dwo and .o files so they only ever need the one symbol - no need
to keep it (and have an unused symbol) in the DwarfStringPool used for
fission/.dwo.
Refactor a bunch of accelerator table usage to remove duplication so I
didn't have to touch 4-5 callers.
llvm-svn: 217628
So that the two operations in DwarfDebug couldn't get separated (because
I accidentally separated them in some work in progress), put them
together. While we're here, move DwarfUnit::addRange to
DwarfCompileUnit, since it's not relevant to type units.
llvm-svn: 217468
PrevSection/PrevCU are used to detect holes in the address range of a CU
to ensure the DW_AT_ranges does not include those holes. When we see a
function with no debug info, though it may be in the same range as the
prior and subsequent functions, there should be a gap in the CU's
ranges. By setting PrevCU to null in that case, the range would not be
extended to cover the gap.
llvm-svn: 217466
It's probably not a huge deal to not do this - if we could, maybe the
address could be reused by a subprogram low_pc and avoid an extra
relocation, but it's just one per CU at best.
llvm-svn: 217338
specifier and change the default behavior to only emit the
DW_AT_accessibility(public) attribute when the isPublic() is explicitly
set.
rdar://problem/18154959
llvm-svn: 216799
Rushed when I realized I hadn't committed the FreeDeleter for a clang
change I'd committed, and didn't check that I had things lying around in
my client.
Apologies for the noise.
llvm-svn: 216792
variables (for example, by-value struct arguments passed in registers, or
large integer values split across several smaller registers).
On the IR level, this adds a new type of complex address operation OpPiece
to DIVariable that describes size and offset of a variable fragment.
On the DWARF emitter level, all pieces describing the same variable are
collected, sorted and emitted as DWARF expressions using the DW_OP_piece
and DW_OP_bit_piece operators.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3373
rdar://problem/15928306
What this patch doesn't do / Future work:
- This patch only adds the backend machinery to make this work, patches
that change SROA and SelectionDAG's type legalizer to actually create
such debug info will follow. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D2680)
- Making the DIVariable complex expressions into an argument of dbg.value
will reduce the memory footprint of the debug metadata.
- The sorting/uniquing of pieces should be moved into DebugLocEntry,
to facilitate the merging of multi-piece entries.
llvm-svn: 214576
Per feedback on r214111, we are going to use null to represent unspecified
parameter. If the type array is {null}, it means a function that returns void;
If the type array is {null, null}, it means a variadic function that returns
void. In summary if we have more than one element in the type array and the last
element is null, it is a variadic function.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214189
DITypeArray is an array of DITypeRef, at its creation, we will create
DITypeRef (i.e use the identifier if the type node has an identifier).
This is the last patch to unique the type array of a subroutine type.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214132
This is the second of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
For vector and array types, getElements returns the array of subranges, so it
is a better name than getTypeArray. Even for class, struct and enum types,
getElements returns the members, which can be subprograms.
setArrays can set up to two arrays, the second is the templates.
This commit should have no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214112
This doesn't fix the abstract variable handling yet, but it introduces a
similar delay mechanism as was added for subprograms, causing
DW_AT_location to be reordered to the beginning of the attribute list
for local variables, and fixes all the test fallout for that.
A subsequent commit will remove the abstract variable handling in
DbgVariable and just do the abstract variable lookup at module end to
ensure that abstract variables introduced after their concrete
counterparts are appropriately referenced by the concrete variable.
llvm-svn: 210943
This ensures that member functions, for example, are entered into
pubnames with their fully qualified name, rather than inside the global
namespace.
llvm-svn: 210379
Abstract variables within abstract scopes that are entirely optimized
away in their first inlining are omitted because their scope is not
present so the variable is never created. Instead, we should ensure the
scope is created so the variable can be added, even if it's been
optimized away in its first inlining.
This fixes the incorrect debug info in missing-abstract-variable.ll
(added in r210143) and passes an asserts self-hosting build, so
hopefully there's not more of these issues left behind... *fingers
crossed*.
llvm-svn: 210221
Along with a test case to demonstrate that due to inlining order there
are cases where abstract variable DIEs are not constructed since the
abstract subprogram was built due to a previous inlining that optimized
away those variables. This produces incorrect debug info (the 'missing'
abstract variable causes the inlined instance of that variable to be
emitted with a full description (name, line, file) rather than
referencing the abstract origin), but this commit at least ensures that
it doesn't crash...
llvm-svn: 210143
This was previously committed in r209680 and reverted in r209683 after
it caused sanitizer builds to crash.
The issue seems to be that the DebugLoc associated with dbg.value IR
intrinsics isn't necessarily accurate. Instead, we duplicate the
DIVariables and add an InlinedAt field to them to record their
location.
We were using this InlinedAt field to compute the LexicalScope for the
variable, but not using it in the abstract DbgVariable construction and
mapping. This resulted in a formal parameter to the current concrete
function, correctly having no InlinedAt information, but incorrectly
having a DebugLoc that described an inlined location within the
function... thus an abstract DbgVariable was created for the variable,
but its DIE was never constructed (since the LexicalScope had no such
variable). This DbgVariable was silently ignored (by testing for a
non-null DIE on the abstract DbgVariable).
So, fix this by using the right scoping information when constructing
abstract DbgVariables.
In the long run, I suspect we want to undo the work that added this
second kind of location tracking and fix the places where the DebugLoc
propagation on the dbg.value intrinsic fails. This will shrink debug
info (by not duplicating DIVariables), make it more efficient (by not
having to construct new DIVariable metadata nodes to try to map back to
a single variable), and benefit all instructions.
But perhaps there are insurmountable issues with DebugLoc quality that
I'm unaware of... I just don't know how we can't /just keep the DebugLoc
from the dbg.declare to the dbg.values and never get this wrong/.
Some history context:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=135629http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=137253
llvm-svn: 209984
I'm not sure exactly where/how we end up with an abstract DbgVariable
with a null DIE, but we do... looking into it & will add a test and/or
fix when I figure it out.
Currently shows up in selfhost or compiler-rt builds.
llvm-svn: 209683
This is a precursor to fixing inlined debug info where the concrete,
out-of-line definition may preceed any inlined usage. To cope with this,
the attributes that may appear on the concrete definition or the
abstract definition are delayed until the end of the module. Then, if an
abstract definition was created, it is referenced (and no other
attributes are added to the out-of-line definition), otherwise the
attributes are added directly to the out-of-line definition.
In a couple of cases this causes not just reordering of attributes, but
reordering of types. When the creation of the attribute is delayed, if
that creation would create a type (such as for a DW_AT_type attribute)
then other top level DIEs may've been constructed during the delay,
causing the referenced type to be created and added after those
intervening DIEs. In the extreme case, in cross-cu-inlining.ll, this
actually causes the DW_TAG_basic_type for "int" to move from one CU to
another.
llvm-svn: 209674
Undecided whether this should include a test case - SROA produces bad
dbg.value metadata describing a value for a reference that is actually
the value of the thing the reference refers to. For now, loosening the
assert lets this not assert, but it's still bogus/wrong output...
If someone wants to tell me to add a test, I'm willing/able, just
undecided. Hopefully we'll get SROA fixed soon & we can tighten up this
assertion again.
llvm-svn: 209240
David Blaikie