Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Evandro Menezes 85bd3978ae [IR] Refactor attribute methods in Function class (NFC)
Rename the functions that query the optimization kind attributes.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60287

llvm-svn: 357731
2019-04-04 22:40:06 +00:00
Evandro Menezes 7c711ccf36 [IR] Create new method in `Function` class (NFC)
Create method `optForNone()` testing for the function level equivalent of
`-O0` and refactor appropriately.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59852

llvm-svn: 357638
2019-04-03 21:27:03 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea a34bcbf335 Revert rL352238.
llvm-svn: 352241
2019-01-25 21:12:08 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea 890a8e575f [WarnMissedTransforms] Set default to 1.
Summary:
Set default value for retrieved attributes to 1, since the check is against 1.
Eliminates the warning noise generated when the attributes are not present.

Reviewers: sanjoy

Subscribers: jlebar, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57253

llvm-svn: 352238
2019-01-25 20:51:55 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 2946cd7010 Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
Michael Kruse ea9ef34558 [TransformWarning] Do not warn missed transformations in optnone functions.
Optimization transformations are intentionally disabled by the 'optnone'
function attribute. Therefore do not warn if transformation metadata is
still present.

Using the legacy pass manager structure, the `skipFunction` method takes
care for the optnone attribute (already called before this patch). For
the new pass manager, there is no equivalent, so we check for the
'optnone' attribute manually.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55690

llvm-svn: 349184
2018-12-14 19:45:43 +00:00
Michael Kruse 7244852557 [Unroll/UnrollAndJam/Vectorizer/Distribute] Add followup loop attributes.
When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g.

    #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
    #pragma clang loop distribute(enable)

is the same as

    #pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
    #pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)

and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used.

This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance,

    !0 = !{!0, !1, !2}
    !1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"}
    !2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3}
    !3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"}

defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop.

Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account.

For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations.

Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated.

To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied.

With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling).

Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288

llvm-svn: 348944
2018-12-12 17:32:52 +00:00