Currently, we have no front-end type for ppc_fp128 type in IR. PowerPC
target generates ppc_fp128 type from long double now, but there's option
(-mabi=(ieee|ibm)longdouble) to control it and we're going to do
transition from IBM extended double-double ppc_fp128 to IEEE fp128 in
the future.
This patch adds type __ibm128 which always represents ppc_fp128 in IR,
as what GCC did for that type. Without this type in Clang, compilation
will fail if compiling against future version of libstdcxx (which uses
__ibm128 in headers).
Although all operations in backend for __ibm128 is done by software,
only PowerPC enables support for it.
There's something not implemented in this commit, which can be done in
future ones:
- Literal suffix for __ibm128 type. w/W is suitable as GCC documented.
- __attribute__((mode(IF))) should be for __ibm128.
- Complex __ibm128 type.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b8, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c667 by me
> 95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008ae.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf7.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
ed13d8c667 by me
95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
In CUDA/HIP a function may become implicit host device function by
pragma or constexpr. A host device function is checked in both
host and device compilation. However it may be emitted only
on host or device side, therefore the diagnostics should be
deferred until it is known to be emitted.
Currently clang is only able to defer certain diagnostics. This causes
false alarms and limits the usefulness of host device functions.
This patch lets clang defer all overloading resolution diagnostics for host device functions.
An option -fgpu-defer-diag is added to control this behavior. By default
it is off.
It is NFC for other languages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84364
types.
We previously did not treat a function type as dependent if it had a
parameter pack with a non-dependent type -- such a function type depends
on the arity of the pack so is dependent even though none of the
parameter types is dependent. In order to properly handle this, we now
treat pack expansion types as always being dependent types (depending on
at least the pack arity), and always canonically being pack expansion
types, even in the unusual case when the pattern is not a dependent
type. This does mean that we can have canonical types that are pack
expansions that contain no unexpanded packs, which is unfortunate but
not inaccurate.
We also previously did not treat a typedef type as
instantiation-dependent if its canonical type was not
instantiation-dependent. That's wrong because instantiation-dependence
is a property of the type sugar, not of the type; an
instantiation-dependent type can have a non-instantiation-dependent
canonical type.
Summary:
This patch upstreams support for a new storage only bfloat16 C type.
This type is used to implement primitive support for bfloat16 data, in
line with the Bfloat16 extension of the Armv8.6-a architecture, as
detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/arm-architecture-developments-armv8-6-a
The bfloat type, and its properties are specified in the Arm Architecture
Reference Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0487/latest/arm-architecture-reference-manual-armv8-for-armv8-a-architecture-profile
In detail this patch:
- introduces an opaque, storage-only C-type __bf16, which introduces a new bfloat IR type.
This is part of a patch series, starting with command-line and Bfloat16
assembly support. The subsequent patches will upstream intrinsics
support for BFloat16, followed by Matrix Multiplication and the
remaining Virtualization features of the armv8.6-a architecture.
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Luke Cheeseman
- Momchil Velikov
- Alexandros Lamprineas
- Luke Geeson
- Simon Tatham
- Ties Stuij
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, rjmccall, rsmith, liutianle, RKSimon, craig.topper, jfb, LukeGeeson, fpetrogalli
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: labrinea, majnemer, asmith, dexonsmith, kristof.beyls, arphaman, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76077
This reverts commit 61ba1481e2.
I'm reverting this because it breaks the lldb build with
incomplete switch coverage warnings. I would fix it forward,
but am not familiar enough with lldb to determine the correct
fix.
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:3958:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4633:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4889:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
Introduction/Motivation:
LLVM-IR supports integers of non-power-of-2 bitwidth, in the iN syntax.
Integers of non-power-of-two aren't particularly interesting or useful
on most hardware, so much so that no language in Clang has been
motivated to expose it before.
However, in the case of FPGA hardware normal integer types where the
full bitwidth isn't used, is extremely wasteful and has severe
performance/space concerns. Because of this, Intel has introduced this
functionality in the High Level Synthesis compiler[0]
under the name "Arbitrary Precision Integer" (ap_int for short). This
has been extremely useful and effective for our users, permitting them
to optimize their storage and operation space on an architecture where
both can be extremely expensive.
We are proposing upstreaming a more palatable version of this to the
community, in the form of this proposal and accompanying patch. We are
proposing the syntax _ExtInt(N). We intend to propose this to the WG14
committee[1], and the underscore-capital seems like the active direction
for a WG14 paper's acceptance. An alternative that Richard Smith
suggested on the initial review was __int(N), however we believe that
is much less acceptable by WG14. We considered _Int, however _Int is
used as an identifier in libstdc++ and there is no good way to fall
back to an identifier (since _Int(5) is indistinguishable from an
unnamed initializer of a template type named _Int).
[0]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/software/programmable/quartus-prime/hls-compiler.html)
[1]http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2472.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967
Function trailing requires clauses now parsed, supported in overload resolution and when calling, referencing and taking the address of functions or function templates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
lambda from within the lambda-declarator.
Instead of trying to reconstruct whether a parameter pack was declared
inside a lambda (which we can't do correctly in general because we might
not have attached parameters to their declaration contexts yet), track
the set of parameter packs introduced in each live lambda scope, and
require only those parameters to be immediately expanded when they
appear inside that lambda.
In passing, fix incorrect disambiguation of a lambda-expression starting
with an init-capture pack in a braced-init-list. We previously
incorrectly parsed that as a designated initializer.
llvm-svn: 369985
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
This case is particularly important for clangd, as it is triggered after
inserting the snippet for variadic functions.
Reviewers: kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64677
llvm-svn: 366200
This permits an init-capture to introduce a new pack:
template<typename ...T> auto x = [...a = T()] { /* a is a pack */ };
To support this, the mechanism for allowing ParmVarDecls to be packs has
been extended to support arbitrary local VarDecls.
llvm-svn: 361300
The various CorrectionCandidateCallbacks are currently heap-allocated
unconditionally. This was needed because of delayed typo correction.
However these allocations represent currently 15.4% of all allocations
(number of allocations) when parsing all of Boost (!), mostly because
of ParseCastExpression, ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttrtibutes
and isCXXDeclarationSpecifier. Note that all of these callback objects
are small. Let's not do this.
Instead initially allocate the callback on the stack, and only do a
heap allocation if we are going to do some typo correction. Do this by:
1. Adding a clone function to each callback, which will do a polymorphic
clone of the callback. This clone function is required to be implemented
by every callback (of which there is a fair amount). Make sure this is
the case by making it pure virtual.
2. Use this clone function when we are going to try to correct a typo.
This additionally cut the time of -fsyntax-only on all of Boost by 0.5%
(not that much, but still something). No functional changes intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58827
Reviewed By: rnk
llvm-svn: 356925
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
The documentation for RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseDecl states that the
Decl being traversed may be null. In fact, this is the case when a
CXXCatchStmt with no exception decl is traversed. Because the visitor
for diagnosing unexpanded parameter packs does not check for null, it
ends up crashing when it attempts to call the Decl::isParameterPack
method on a null Decl pointer.
Add a null check to prevent an ICE, and a test case that would crash
otherwise. Also, because the test requires C++ exceptions and C++14,
change the test parameters for the entire test file. (Alternatively, I
thought about adding a new test file, but went with this approach for my
own convenience.)
Co-authored-by: Andreas Molzer <andreas.molzer@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Mara Bos <m-ou.se@m-ou.se>
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56271
llvm-svn: 350501
This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
provided by an outer template.
We made the incorrect assumption in various places that the only way we
can have any arguments already provided for a pack during template
argument deduction was from a partially-specified pack. That's not true;
we can also have arguments from an enclosing already-instantiated
template, and that can even result in the function template's own pack
parameters having a fixed length and not being packs for the purposes of
template argument deduction.
llvm-svn: 337481
This diff includes changes for the remaining _Fract and _Sat fixed point types.
```
signed short _Fract s_short_fract;
signed _Fract s_fract;
signed long _Fract s_long_fract;
unsigned short _Fract u_short_fract;
unsigned _Fract u_fract;
unsigned long _Fract u_long_fract;
// Aliased fixed point types
short _Accum short_accum;
_Accum accum;
long _Accum long_accum;
short _Fract short_fract;
_Fract fract;
long _Fract long_fract;
// Saturated fixed point types
_Sat signed short _Accum sat_s_short_accum;
_Sat signed _Accum sat_s_accum;
_Sat signed long _Accum sat_s_long_accum;
_Sat unsigned short _Accum sat_u_short_accum;
_Sat unsigned _Accum sat_u_accum;
_Sat unsigned long _Accum sat_u_long_accum;
_Sat signed short _Fract sat_s_short_fract;
_Sat signed _Fract sat_s_fract;
_Sat signed long _Fract sat_s_long_fract;
_Sat unsigned short _Fract sat_u_short_fract;
_Sat unsigned _Fract sat_u_fract;
_Sat unsigned long _Fract sat_u_long_fract;
// Aliased saturated fixed point types
_Sat short _Accum sat_short_accum;
_Sat _Accum sat_accum;
_Sat long _Accum sat_long_accum;
_Sat short _Fract sat_short_fract;
_Sat _Fract sat_fract;
_Sat long _Fract sat_long_fract;
```
This diff only allows for declaration of these fixed point types. Assignment and other operations done on fixed point types according to http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1169.pdf will be added in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46911
llvm-svn: 334718
// Primary fixed point types
signed short _Accum s_short_accum;
signed _Accum s_accum;
signed long _Accum s_long_accum;
unsigned short _Accum u_short_accum;
unsigned _Accum u_accum;
unsigned long _Accum u_long_accum;
// Aliased fixed point types
short _Accum short_accum;
_Accum accum;
long _Accum long_accum;
This diff only allows for declaration of the fixed point types. Assignment and other operations done on fixed point types according to http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1169.pdf will be added in future patches. The saturated versions of these types and the equivalent _Fract types will also be added in future patches.
The tests included are for asserting that we can declare these types.
Fixed the test that was failing by not checking for dso_local on some
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46084
llvm-svn: 333923
```
// Primary fixed point types
signed short _Accum s_short_accum;
signed _Accum s_accum;
signed long _Accum s_long_accum;
unsigned short _Accum u_short_accum;
unsigned _Accum u_accum;
unsigned long _Accum u_long_accum;
// Aliased fixed point types
short _Accum short_accum;
_Accum accum;
long _Accum long_accum;
```
This diff only allows for declaration of the fixed point types. Assignment and other operations done on fixed point types according to http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1169.pdf will be added in future patches. The saturated versions of these types and the equivalent `_Fract` types will also be added in future patches.
The tests included are for asserting that we can declare these types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46084
llvm-svn: 333814
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
FunctionProtoType.
We previously re-evaluated the expression each time we wanted to know whether
the type is noexcept or not. We now evaluate the expression exactly once.
This is not quite "no functional change": it fixes a crasher bug during AST
deserialization where we would try to evaluate the noexcept specification in a
situation where we have not deserialized sufficient portions of the AST to
permit such evaluation.
llvm-svn: 331428
This is not yet part of any C++ working draft, and so is controlled by the flag
-fchar8_t rather than a -std= flag. (The GCC implementation is controlled by a
flag with the same name.)
This implementation is experimental, and will be removed or revised
substantially to match the proposal as it makes its way through the C++
committee.
llvm-svn: 331244
We could in principle support such pack expansion, using techniques similar to
what we do for pack expansion of lambdas, but it's not clear it's worthwhile.
For now at least, cleanly reject these cases rather than crashing.
llvm-svn: 324160
- reverts r321622, r321625, and r321626.
- the use of bit-fields is still resulting in warnings - even though we can use static-asserts to harden the code and ensure the bit-fields are wide enough. The bots still complain of warnings being seen.
- to silence the warnings requires specifying the bit-fields with the underlying enum type (as opposed to the enum type itself), which then requires lots of unnecessary static casts of each enumerator within DeclSpec to the underlying-type, which even though could be seen as implementation details, it does hamper readability - and given the additional litterings, makes me question the value of the change.
So in short - I give up (for now at least).
Sorry about the noise.
llvm-svn: 321628
- Since these enums are used as bit-fields - for the bit-fields to be interpreted as unsigned, the underlying type must be specified as unsigned.
Previous failed attempt - wherein I did not specify an underlying type - was the sum of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321614https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321615
llvm-svn: 321622
- the enum changes to TypeSpecifierType are breaking some tests - and will require a more careful integration.
Sorry about rushing these changes - thought I could sneak them in prior to heading out for new years ;)
llvm-svn: 321616
Kazu Hirata