The original proposal was adopted in Apr 2019, but was subsequently
updated by WG14 N2662 in June 2021. We already supported the attribute
on a label and it behaved as expected, but we had not bumped the
feature test value.
The main focus of this patch is to make ArgType::matchesType check for
possible default parameter promotions when the argType is not a pointer.
If so, no warning will be given for `int`, `unsigned int` types as
corresponding arguments to %hhd and %hd. However, the usage of %hhd
corresponding to short is relatively rare, and it is more likely to be a
misuse. This patch keeps the original behavior of clang like this as
much as possible, while making it more convenient to consider the
default arguments promotion.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57102
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, nickdesaulniers, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132568
It was originally left off thinking the paper only impacts the C
standard library, but Clang supports diagnostics for incorrect use of
a format specifier, so this paper has some frontend impacts as well.
WG14 N3047 is the last C working draft before the document goes out
for committee ballot, so this should be the last of the C2x compiler
features to be added.
This implements
N2836 Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31.
The feature was already implemented for C++,
and the semantics are the same.
Unlike C++ there was, afaict, no decision to
backport the feature in older languages mode,
so C17 and earlier are not modified and the
code point tables for these language modes are conserved.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130416
We currently have a page for tracking defects against the C++ standard,
but we don't have the same information for the C standard. This starts
us down the path of being able to track that in a way our users can see.
There are *a lot* of entries marked as "Unknown". As we validate
Clang's behavior for a given DR by adding a test case for it, we can
slowly begin to improve this page over time.
This page is now linked from the existing C status page, which was
updated slightly as a result of these changes as well.
Note, unlike with the C++ defect report page, this content is not auto-
generated from a source document and is not automatically updated from
test comments. It may be worthwhile to automate the updates based on
our test coverage, but that can happen later.
WG14 has elected to remove support for K&R C functions in C2x. The
feature was introduced into C89 already deprecated, so after this long
of a deprecation period, the committee has made an empty parameter list
mean the same thing in C as it means in C++: the function accepts no
arguments exactly as if the function were written with (void) as the
parameter list.
This patch implements WG14 N2841 No function declarators without
prototypes (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2841.htm)
and WG14 N2432 Remove support for function definitions with identifier
lists (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2432.pdf).
It also adds The -fno-knr-functions command line option to opt into
this behavior in other language modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123955
This completes the implementation of
WG14 N2412 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2412.pdf),
which standardizes C on a twos complement representation for integer
types. The only work that remained there was to define the correct
macros in the standard headers, which this patch does.
Although we moved to Github Issues. The bug report message refers to
Bugzilla still. This patch tries to update these URLs.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, Quuxplusone, jhenderson, libunwind, libc++
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116351
This doesn't add all of the document numbers, but it adds a bunch of
them. Not all of the documents are available on the committee page
(they're old enough that they come from a time when the mailing was
comprised of physical pieces of paper), so some of the documents listed
are assumed to be correct based on my reading of editor's reports.
This adds implementation information for N2607,
clarifies that C17 only resolved defect reports,
and adds -std= information for the different versions.
Evgeny Shulgin